Abstract
At the center of medical decision-making is always the patient; their story, their feelings, their family support and their unique perception of the problem. At this intersection of medical art and science stands the surgeon who must combine the unique aspects of the ancient art of healing with modern medical science to provide the treatment most likely to create a good outcome. Instinctively we as surgeons tend to rely on impressions from our clinical practice, experiences during surgical training, or maybe what we have just heard at the morbidity and mortality conference this week. This anecdotal decision making, while typically thought of as rudimentary and not “evidence-based”, is in fact one of the most basic forms of evidence based medicine(EBM). This method of medical practice has been known since antiquity where early EBM was based on ancient historical or anecdotal accounts. Teaching during this time was mainly authoritative and passed on with stories. By the seventeenth century, a renaissance era of medical practice had ushered the earliest form of modern EBM. During this period, written journals were kept and textbooks began to become more prominent.
Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?T.S. Eliot 1934
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268(17):2420–5.
Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268(2):240–8.
Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final report. Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries; 1989.
Straus SE, Green ML, Bell DS, Badgett R, Davis D, Gerrity M, Ortiz E, Shaneyfelt TM, Whelan C, Mangrulkar R. Evaluating the teaching of evidence based medicine: conceptual framework. Society of General Internal Medicine Evidence-Based Medicine Task Force. BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1029–32.
Zmora O, Mahajna A, Bar-Zakai B, Hershko D, Shabtai M, Krausz MM, Ayalon A. Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for left-sided colonic anastomosis? Results of a prospective randomized trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2006;10(2):131–5.
Kiran RP, Murray AC, Chiuzan C, Estrada D, Forde K. Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;262(3):416–25.
Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1414–20.
Smith GC, Pell JP. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2003;327(7429):1459–61.
Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. ACP J Club. 2002;136(2):A11–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Umanskiy, K. (2017). Introduction. In: Hyman, N., Umanskiy, K. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Colorectal Surgery. Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40223-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40223-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40222-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40223-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)