Skip to main content

The Current State of Hemodialysis Access and Dialysis Access Initiatives in the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hemodialysis Access

Abstract

Although the past five decades have witnessed dramatic transformations in dialysis technologies and health-care infrastructure, the fundamental dependence of each patient undergoing maintenance hemodialysis on long-term reliable vascular access has remained unchanged. The past decade in the United States has witnessed the development and implementation of a number of vascular access initiatives led by a variety of different stakeholders focused on increasing the prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas and limiting the use of central venous catheters in hemodialysis patients. These have included the Fistula First Initiative most prominently and also include the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program, the Healthy People 2020 campaign, and the Renal Physicians Association Vascular Access Initiative. Coinciding with implementation of these initiatives has been an acceleration of a marked transition from the dominant use of arteriovenous grafts to that of arteriovenous fistulas among individuals in the United States undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. In contrast to the distribution of vascular access types used by prevalent patients, the distribution of access use by patients starting maintenance hemodialysis has shown remarkably little change over the past decade. Over the past 3–4 years, recognition of the plateauing proportion of prevalent hemodialysis patients using fistulas as well as the persistently and unacceptably high proportion of patients starting dialysis with catheters has led to calls to reorient the Fistula First Initiative to include a renewed emphasis on primarily discouraging the long-term use of central venous catheters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Al-Jaishi AA, Oliver MJ, Thomas SM, et al. Patency rates of the arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63:464–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Astor BC, Eustace JA, Powe NR, et al. Type of vascular access and survival among incident hemodialysis patients: the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD (CHOICE) study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:1449–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker LD, Johnson JM, Goldfarb D. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) subcutaneous arteriovenous conduit: an improved vascular access for chronic hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1976;22:382–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradbury BD, Chen F, Furniss A, et al. Conversion of vascular access type among incident hemodialysis patients: description and association with mortality. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:804–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K, Hurwich BJ. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med. 1966;275:1089–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Combe C, Bérard X. Dialysis: “Catheter Last” not “Fistula First” in elderly patients. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013;9:632–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dember LM, Imrey PB, Beck GJ, et al. Objectives and design of the hemodialysis Fistula maturation study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63:104–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeSilva RN, Patibandla BK, Vin Y, et al. Fistula first is not always the best strategy for the elderly. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24:1297–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. ESRD National Coordinating Center. Fistula First Catheter Last Initiative. 2015. www.esrdncc.org/ffcl/. Accessed 22 June 2015.

  10. Feldman HI, Held PJ, Hutchinson JT, et al. Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity in the United States. Kidney Int. 1993;43:1091–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Finelli L, Miller JT, Tokars JI, et al. Special article: national surveillance of dialysis-associated diseases in the United States, 2002. Semin Dial. 2005;18:52–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hicks CW, Canner JK, Arhuidese I, et al. Mortality benefits of different hemodialysis access types are age dependent. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:449–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lacson E, Wang W, Lazarus JM, Hakim RM. Change in vascular access and hospitalization risk in long-term hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1996–2003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee T, Thamer M, Zhang Y, et al. Outcomes of elderly patients after Predialysis vascular access creation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(12):3133–40. ASN.2014090938.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lok CE. Fistula First Initiative: advantages and pitfalls. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:1043–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lok CE, Foley R. Vascular access morbidity and mortality: trends of the last decade. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:1213–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. NKF KDQOI Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48 Suppl 1:S176–247.

    Google Scholar 

  18. O’Hare AM, Bertenthal D, Walter LC, et al. When to refer patients with chronic kidney disease for vascular access surgery: should age be a consideration? Kidney Int. 2007;71:555–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Polkinghorne KR, McDonald SP, Atkins RC, Kerr PG. Vascular access and All-cause mortality: a propensity score analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:477–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravani P, Palmer SC, Oliver MJ, et al. Associations between hemodialysis access type and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24:465–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Renal Physicians Association. Vascular access initiative. 2011. http://www.renalmd.org/page.aspx?id=2544. Accessed 24 June 2015.

  22. Rivara MB, Mehrotra R. Is early initiation of dialysis harmful? Semin Dial. 2014;27:250–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwab SJ, Buller GL, McCann RL, et al. Prospective evaluation of a Dacron cuffed hemodialysis catheter for prolonged use. Am J Kidney Dis. 1988;11:166–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. United States Renal Data System. 2014 USRDS annual data report. An overview of the epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vassalotti JA, Jennings WC, Beathard GA, et al. Fistula first breakthrough initiative: targeting catheter last in fistula first. Semin Dial. 2012;25:303–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wish JB. Vascular access for dialysis in the United States: progress, hurdles, controversies, and the future. Semin Dial. 2010;23:614–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Some data reported in this chapter have been supplied by the US Renal Data System (USRDS) and the Fistula First Catheter Last (FFCL) Coalition. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the US government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajnish Mehrotra MD, MS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rivara, M.B., Mehrotra, R. (2017). The Current State of Hemodialysis Access and Dialysis Access Initiatives in the United States. In: Shalhub, S., Dua, A., Shin, S. (eds) Hemodialysis Access. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40061-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40061-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40059-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40061-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics