Skip to main content

New Literacies and Technology: Keeping Current in a Writing Methods Course

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Being Self-Study Researchers in a Digital World

Part of the book series: Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices ((STEP,volume 16))

Abstract

Understandings of reading and writing in digital environments have been referred to as new literacies. Digital technologies, as they pertain to writing, do not just support writing, but change what we write, the ways we write, and who we are writing to. These changes, and what they mean for effective P-12 teaching and learning, have important implications for literacy teacher educators and teacher education programs. With these issues in mind, we embarked on a collaborative self-study focused on examining what we were doing about technology in our K-8 writing methods courses. We were curious about how this had changed over the last 9 years. Findings from this inquiry revealed that some changes evolved over time, while others blossomed quickly. Changes clustered around two categories – written products and writing processes--and how these affected our knowledge and teaching practices. Additionally, our vulnerabilities as writing teacher educators in the face of rapidly changing technology came through in this inquiry. Implications for teacher educators are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ball, D., & Forenzi, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R. V., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self- study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coiro et al., (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacy research. In J. Coiro, M. Knoble, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 13–23). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Educating the new educator: Teacher education and the future of democracy. The New Educator, 1, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, L. R., & Cappelli, R. (2007). Mentor texts: Teaching writing through children’s literature, K-6. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2013). Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge. Don Mills, ON: Pearson Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., Poursanidou, D., Simms, M., & Windle, J. (2006). Defining workspaces, defining ourselves. In L. Fitzgerald, M. L. Heston, & D. L. Tidwell (Eds.), Collaboration and community: Pushing boundaries through self-study (pp. 288–289). Cedar Falls, IA: University of Northern Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., et al. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, A., Hodgson, K., & Morgan, C. (2009). Teaching the new writing: Technology, change and assessment in the 21st century classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, M. (2003). Understanding visual rhetoric in digital writing environments. College Composition and Communication, 54(4), 629–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Reading Association. (2002). Integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum. A position statement of the international reading association. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED462709.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2011). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 14–27). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karchmer- Klein, R. (2013). Best practices in using technology to support writing. In S. Graham, C. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 309–333). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D. (2009). A teacher educator writes and shares: Student perceptions of a publicly literate life. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 338–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. La Boskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2, pp. 817–869). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the internet. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 310–336). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litt, D. G., Martin, S. D., & Place, N. A. (2014). Literacy teacher education: Principles and practices. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2007). A history and context of self- study of teaching and teacher education practices. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 7–39). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. D., & Chase, M. (2010). Sharing our writing with students: Examining tensions and questioning our motives. In L. B. Erickson, J. R. Young, & S. Pinnegar (Eds.), Navigating the public and the private: Negotiating the diverse landscape of teacher education (pp. 156–159). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. D., & Dismuke, S. (2013). Engaging teachers in digital products and processes: Interview feature articles. In K. E. Pytash, R. E. Ferdig, & T. V. Rasinski (Eds.), Preparing teachers to teach writing using technology (pp. 97–108). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. D., & Dismuke, S. (2014a). Writing across the curriculum: An integrated, multigenre project. In D. Litt, S. Martin, & N. Place (Eds.), Literacy teacher education: Principles and practice (pp. 127–138). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. D., & Dismuke, S. (2014b). Composing and decomposing: Understanding the complexities of the writing process through visual representations. In D. Litt, S. Martin, & N. Place (Eds.), Literacy teacher education: Principles and practice (pp. 119–123). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. D., & Dismuke, S. (2015a). Maneuvering together towards developing new practices: Examining our collaborative processes. Studying Teacher Education, 11(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. D., & Dismuke, S. (2015b). Teacher candidates’ perceptions of their learning and engagement in a writing methods course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 104–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moline, S. (2012). I see what you mean: Visual literacy K-8. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Writing (NCW). (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/writingcom/neglectedr.pdf

  • Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923–948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell, D., & Fitzgerald, L. (2007). Self-study as teaching. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. La Boskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 69–102). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, G. (2011). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product. New York: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tysseling, L. A., & Laster, B. P. (2013). Taking technology from clinic to classroom. In E. T. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheek Jr. (Eds.), Advanced literacy practices: From the clinic to the classroom. Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, A. (2001). Impossibly distinct: On form/content and word/ image in two pieces of computer-based interactive multimedia. Computers and Composition, 18, 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan D. Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, S.D., Dismuke, S. (2017). New Literacies and Technology: Keeping Current in a Writing Methods Course. In: Garbett, D., Ovens, A. (eds) Being Self-Study Researchers in a Digital World. Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39478-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39478-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39476-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39478-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics