Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics ((AMMA,volume 35))

  • 1145 Accesses

Abstract

Many real fluids exhibit response characteristics that cannot be satisfactorily described by the classical Navier–Stokes fluid model and such fluids are referred to as non-Newtonian fluids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It would have been more appropriate to have used the terminology non-Navier–Stokesian fluids rather than non-Newtonian fluids as the theories of fluid advanced by Newton are quite far removed from the Navier–Stokes theory. This is not surprising as the notion of a partial derivative had not yet been invented. Also, Newton advanced more than one theory to describe the motion of fluids. As Dugas [86] points out, Newton proposed two theories for fluids, the first “a schematic theory of fluids, which he considered to be formed of an aggregate of elastic particles, which repelled each other, were arranged at equal distances from each other, and were free”, and “In the second theory the particles of the fluid are contiguous”. The two theories led to results to the resistance due to the translation of a solid cylinder in a fluid body of infinite extent to differ by a factor of four. In [272], Truesdell goes as far as to aver that “Newton’s theories of fluids are largely false”. We shall use the terminology non-Newtonian fluid as this has become the terminology adopted by the practitioners in the field. We shall also use the terminology “Newtonian fluid” and “Navier–Stokes fluid” interchangeably.

  2. 2.

    We are interested in departures from the behavior exhibited by “Newtonian fluids” in what one understands as laminar flows. Turbulent flows of fluids described in the laminar flow regime by the Navier–Stokes model remain shrouded in mystery with numerous models being used to describe different categories of turbulent flows.

  3. 3.

    Some fluid models can be cast as rate type or integral type models, and example of the same being the eponymous model due to Maxwell [184]. Recently, Rajagopal in [227] (see also Prusa and Rajagopal [219]) has introduced a new class of fluid models wherein the history of the deformation gradient and the history of the stress are implicitly related. The class introduced by Rajagopal in [227] includes most of the fluid models of the differential, rate, and integral type and introduces new models that can describe phenomena that are not possible to characterize within the context of models currently in use, an example being the dependence of the material moduli on the invariants of both the stress, kinematical variables and mixed invariants of the stress and the appropriate kinematical tensors.

  4. 4.

    If by a fluid one means a body that cannot resist a shear stress, however small the time interval, then the terminology “Bingham fluid” is an oxymoron as the appellation is supposed to describe a body that can resist a shear force until a particular threshold is achieved for the shear stress. Since the material flows like a fluid once the threshold is exceeded, it is considered a fluid.

  5. 5.

    It would be fair to say that the readers are introduced to a particular thermodynamic perspective as there is considerable disagreement concerning in what form the second law of thermodynamics is to be enforced. We shall not get into a discussion of the various perspectives, their merits and demerits. We shall merely present the consequences of the Clausius-Duhem inequality being used as the surrogate for the second law of thermodynamics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Cioranescu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cioranescu, D., Girault, V., Rajagopal, K.R. (2016). Introduction. In: Mechanics and Mathematics of Fluids of the Differential Type. Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39330-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics