Abstract
The major challenge in Scotland’s long history of well-intentioned policy has always been implementation, in particular the realisation of a constructive and effective relationship across research, policy, and practice. Scottish experience provides a basis for radical changes, of potential international significance, in assessment policies to ensure better practical orientation to learning. The chapter considers critically the relationship between assessment policy rhetoric in the Curriculum for Excellence (for students aged 3–15) and provision of practical guidance and professional learning opportunities. It draws on understanding of what matters in the process of change gained from previous Scottish experience in the Assessment is for Learning programme. Evidence from a study of early Curriculum for Excellence assessment practice, Assessment at Transition, shows how the design, findings, and conduct of that project have led to some collaborative action by researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to make effective implementation of key assessment policy intentions more likely, despite the inadequacy of the support originally provided. The argument then moves beyond steps to help the implementation of current Scottish policy by proposing a number of major changes to the purposes and content of typical ‘traditional’ assessment policies and practices not only in Scotland but in many countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. http://www.aaia.org.uk/content/uploads/2010/06/Assessment-for-Learning-10-principles.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2015.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–73.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: GL Assessment.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2002). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London: King’s College London School of Education.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Colbert, P., Wyatt-Smith, C., & Klenowski, V. (2012). A systems level approach to building sustainable assessment cultures: Moderation, quality task design and dependability of judgment. Policy Futures in Education, 10(4), 387–402.
Condie, R., Livingston, K., & Seagraves, L. (2005). The assessment is for learning programme: An evaluation. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Education Department. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/12/0792641/26439. Accessed June 9, 2014.
Crooks, T., Darr, C., Gilmore, A., Hall, C., Hattie, J., Smith, J., & Smith, L. (2009). Towards defining, assessing and reporting against national standards for literacy and numeracy in New Zealand. Canterbury: The New Zealand Assessment Academy, University of Canterbury.
Demetriou, H., Goalen, P., & Rudduck, J. (2000). Academic performance, transfer, transition and friendship: Listening to the student voice. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 425–441 (Special Issue: School Transitions and Transfers).
Doddington, C., Flutter, J., & Rudduck, J. (1999). Exploring and explaining ‘dips’ in motivation and performance in primary and secondary schooling. Research in Education, 61, 29–38.
Education Scotland. (2013). Assessing progress and achievement of levels in the 3–15 broad general education. Glasgow: Education Scotland. http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/CfEbriefing2_tcm4-730387.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2015.
Hallam, S., Kirton, A., Pfeffers, J., Robertson, P., & Stobart, G. (2004). Interim report of the evaluation of programme 1 of the Assessment is for Learning Development programme: Support for professional practice in formative assessment. London: Institute of Education, University of London. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/10/19947/42989 Accessed July 30, 2015.
Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students’ motivation for learning. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, In Research evidence in education library.
Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 10(2), 169–207.
Hayward, E. L. (2007). Curriculum, pedagogies and assessment in Scotland: The quest for social justice ‘Ah kent yir faither’. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 14(2), 251–268. doi:10.1080/09695940701480178
Hayward, L. (2012). Assessment and learning: The learner’s perspective. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Hayward, L. (2015). Assessment is learning: The preposition vanishes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(1), 27–43. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.984656
Hayward, L., Boyd, B., MacBride, G., & Spencer, E. (2009). Just making them think: A tension between teaching and assessment in the high stakes stages. Glasgow: Scottish Qualifications Authority (Research Report 13). http://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/files_ccc/Report%2013_Make_Them_Think.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2015.
Hayward, L., Hutchinson, C., & Spencer, E. (2014). Evaluation of stages for early arithmetical learning (SEAL) for East Lothian Council (Research Report). Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
Hayward, L., Menter, I., Baumfield, V., Daugherty, R., Akhtar, N., Doyle, L., et al. (2012). Assessment at transition. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
Hayward, L., Simpson, M., & Spencer, E. (2005). Assessment is for learning: Exploring programme success. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Education Department. http://wayback.archive-it.org/1961/20100806040920, http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/Images/AifL%20Exploring%20Programme%20Success_tcm4-354151.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2015.
Hayward, L., & Spencer, E. (2010). The complexities of change: Formative assessment in Scotland. Curriculum Journal, 21(2), 161–177. doi:10.1080/09585176.2010.480827
Hayward, L., & Spencer, E. (2014). Assessment for learning. In M. Carroll & M. McCulloch (Eds.), Understanding learning and teaching in primary education. London: SAGE Publications.
Henderson, D. (2005, December 9). New tests still to prove their worth. Times Educational Supplement Scotland. https://www.tes.com/article.aspx?storycode=2170216. Accessed October 19, 2015.
Hutchinson, C., & Hayward, L. (2005). The journey so far: Assessment for learning in Scotland. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 225–248. doi:10.1080/09585170500136184.
MacPhail, A., & Halbert, J. (2010). We had to do intelligent thinking during recent PE: Students’ and teachers’ experiences of assessment for learning in post-primary physical education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17(1), 23–39. doi:10.1080/09695940903565412.
Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149. doi:10.1080/02671520600615638.
Morrison, H. G., Busch, J. C., & D’Arcy, J. (1994). Setting reliable national curriculum standards: A guide to the Angoff procedure. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 1(2), 181–199. doi:10.1080/0969594940010204.
Scottish Executive. (2004). A curriculum for excellence: Ministerial response. Edinburgh. Scottish Executive.
Scottish Government. (2002). Circular no. 02: Assessment and reporting 3–14. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/06/2393450/34518. Accessed July 30, 2015.
Scottish Government. (2008a). Building the curriculum 1: The contribution of curriculum areas. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Scottish Government. (2008b). Building the curriculum 2: Active learning in the early years. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Scottish Government. (2008c). Building the curriculum 3: A framework for learning and teaching. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Scottish Government. (2008d). Building the curriculum 4: Skills for learning, skills for life and skills for work. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Scottish Government. (2009). Assessment for curriculum for excellence—Strategic vision, key principles. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Scottish Government. (2011). Building the curriculum 5: A framework for assessment (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Senge, P., & Scharmer, O. (2001). Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: SAGE.
Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., & Gunn, S. (2010). The centrality of teachers’ judgement practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17, 59–75. doi:10.1080/09695940903565610.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spencer, E., Hayward, L. (2016). More Than Good Intentions: Policy and Assessment for Learning in Scotland. In: Laveault, D., Allal, L. (eds) Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39209-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39211-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)