Abstract
In Queensland, Australia, despite a long tradition of classroom-based assessment and scholarly assessment research, assessment for learning (AfL) has not had a distinct identity as a set of ideas within daily teacher classroom practice. Rather, the initial research by the Assessment Reform Group that sparked reform in other contexts has been accommodated into existing policies and practices. This has resulted in missed opportunities for teachers to engage in deep inquiry into the underpinning and interconnected philosophy of AfL as a suite of practices that inform ongoing teacher and student dialogue into improving learning. However, recent national assessment policy changes have disrupted curriculum planning, assessment and reporting practices and enabled renewed conversations about the role of assessment in informing classroom learning. This chapter focuses on the first phase of AfL classroom practice that involved developing shared teacher understanding of assessment standards. We suggest that this dialogue about standards at the beginning of the teaching semester is a necessary precursor to informed teaching that involves the sharing of expected standards with students, and is an opportunity for teachers to engage with the philosophy of AfL.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This information is accessible through http://www.assessmentforlearning.edu.au/default.asp?id=912.
References
Absolum, M., Flockton, L., Hattie, J., Hipkins, R., & Reid, I. (2009). Directions for assessment in New Zealand (DANZ): Developing students’ assessment capabilities. Wellington: Ministry of Education. http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Media/Files/Directions-for-Assessment-in-New-Zealand. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Adie, L., & Willis, J. (2014). Using annotations to inform an understanding of achievement standards. Assessment Matters, 6, 112–136.
Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Testing, motivation and learning. Cambridge: The Assessment Reform Group.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2013a). NAPLAN. http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/naplan.html. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2013b). NAPLAN Infographic. http://www.nap.edu.au/verve/_resources/Acara_NAPLAN_Infographic%28V4-2%29.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). The Australian curriculum. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015). Implications for teaching, assessing and reporting. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/overview/implications-for-teaching-assessing-and-reporting. Accessed from multiple curriculum sites 02 Nov 2015.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014). Australian professional standards for teachers. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/overview/organisation-of-the-standards. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy subjects and policy actors in schools: Some necessary but insufficient analyses. Discourse, 32(4), 611–624.
Berliner, D. (2010). High-stakes assessments and the narrowing of the outcomes of schooling and students’ minds. Keynote paper presented at the blind assessor: Are we constraining or enriching student learning? Symposium, Sydney NSW. http://sydney.edu.au/education_social_work/professional_learning/resources/2010_papers.shtml#sthash.91JoTqco.dpuf. Accessed from multiple curriculum sites 02 Nov 2015.
Bernstein, B. (2003). Class, codes and control: The structuring of pedagogic discourse (Vol. 4). London: Routledge.
Black, P. (2007). Full marks for feedback. In Make the Grade (pp. 18–21). Spring edition.
Earl, L., & Timperley, H. (2014). Challenging conceptions of Assessment. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert (Eds.), Designing assessment for quality learning (pp. 325–336). Dordrecht: Springer.
Education Scotland. (2015). Principals of assessment. http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/learningteachingandassessment/assessment/about/principles/learnerengagement.asp. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Fenwick, L., & Cooper, M. (2012). Prevailing pedagogies for classes in low SES contexts and the implications for standards-based reform in Australia. Australian Educational Research, 39, 349–361.
Fitzgerald, T., & Savage, J. (2013). Scripting, ritualising and performing leadership: Interrogating recent policy developments in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 126–143. doi:10.1080/00220620.2013.769432
Fleming, J., & Kleinhenz, E. (2007). Towards a moving school: Developing a professional learning and performance culture. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
Freebody, P. (2005). Background, rationale and specification: Queensland curriculum, assessment and reporting framework. Queensland, Australia: Queensland Government, Department of Education and the Arts.
Goldstein, H. (2010, January 27). UK academic warns against Australian school league tables (Audio podcast). http://blogs.abc.net.au/canberra/2010/01/uk-academic-warns-against-school-league-tables.html?site=canberra&program=(none). Accessed 03 Nov 2015.
Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(1), 87–99.
Harlen, W. (2007). Assessment of learning. London: Sage.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxon: Routledge.
Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 263–268.
Lingard, B., Mills, M., & Hayes, D. (2006). Enabling and aligning assessment for learning: Some research and policy lessons from Queensland. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 16(2), 83–103.
Looney, A. (2014). Assessment and the reform of education systems. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert (Eds.), Designing assessment for quality learning (pp. 233–248). Dordrecht: Springer.
Luke, A. (2011). Generalizing across borders: Policy and the limits of educational science. Educational Researcher, 40(8), 367–377.
Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149.
Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Masters, G. (2009). A shared challenge: Improving literacy, numeracy and science learning in Queensland primary schools. Australian Council for Educational Research. http://education.qld.gov.au/mastersreview/pdfs/final-report-masters.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Matters, G., & Masters, G. (2014). Redesigning the secondary-tertiary interface: Queensland review of senior assessment and tertiary entrance. Report submitted to the Queensland Minister for Education, Training and Employment, Sept 2014. http://www.acer.edu.au/queensland-review. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2011). Ministry of education position paper: Assessment (schooling sector). Wellington: Learning Media Ltd. http://www.minedu.govt.nz/~/media/MinEdu/Files/TheMinistry/MOEAssessmentPositionPaper_October11.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Building a high quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. Background report for the International Summit on the Teaching Profession: New York 2011. OECD publishing, Paris. http://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/internationaled/background.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Popham, W. J. (2014). Looking at assessment through learning-colored lenses. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert (Eds.), Designing assessment for quality learning (pp. 183–194). Dordrecht: Springer.
Pryor, B., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20. doi:10.1080/03054980701476386
Queensland Curriculum & Assessment Authority. (2014). School-based assessment. The Queensland system. Queensland Government. https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/approach/school-based_assess_qld_sys.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2015). Queensland comparable assessment tasks (QCATs). Queensland Government. https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/3163.html. Accessed 02 Nov 2015.
Queensland Studies Authority. (n.d.) A new perspective: Assessment for learning. https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/p_10/as_afl_new_perspective.docx. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Sadler, R. (1998). Letting students into the secret: Further steps in making criteria and standards work to improve learning. Paper presented at the Annual Conference for State Review Panels and District Panel Chairs, Brisbane. http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/yrs11_12/assessment/docs/criteria.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2015.
Singh, P. (2002). Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 571–582.
Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. In Phi Delta Kappan (pp. 758–765). June.
Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic Assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433–449. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838
Tuinamuana, K. (2011). Teacher Professional standards, accountability, and ideology: Alternative discourses. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 72–82.
Willis, J. (2011). Affiliation, autonomy and assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 399–415. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.604305
Willis, J., & Adie, L. (2013). Negotiating the meaning of achievement standards in the Australian curriculum. Curriculum Perspectives, 33(1), 52–62.
Willis, J., & Adie, L. (2014). Teachers using annotations to engage students in assessment conversations: Recontextualising knowledge. Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 495–515. doi:10.1080/09585176.2014.968599
Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. Australian Educational Researcher, 40(2), 241–256. doi:10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adie, L., Willis, J. (2016). Making Meaning of Assessment Policy in Australia Through Teacher Assessment Conversations. In: Laveault, D., Allal, L. (eds) Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39209-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39211-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)