Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter presents the profile and trends of the academic discipline of Future-oriented Technology Assessment (FTA) and its approaches. This chapter presents the profile and trends of the academic discipline of FTA and its approaches. This is achieved through analyses of the development, focus and scientific impact of FTA. As such, this chapter contributes to the discussion on the conceptual development and academic positioning of FTA (or Foresight). The chapter is based on bibliometric analyses of the special issues of five international journals published after the FTA conferences in 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2011: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Futures, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Science and Public Policy, and Foresight. Methodologically, the paper draws on the principles of Elsevier’s Scopus and Thompson Reuter’s Web of Science. The chapter concludes that the field of FTA seems to have remained remarkably stable over the last decade. As an academic field, FTA has targeted a small number of journals for its publications, which has helped to further define and focus the field. Finally, the chapter concludes that publications in special issues of international journals resulting from the FTA conferences have a similar level of quality and scientific impact as articles published in standard issues of these journals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Organizations such as World Futures Studies Federation are focused on Futures Studies, which we consider somewhat distinct from FTA and Foresight.

References

  • Abadie, F., Friedewald, M., & Weber, K. M. (2010). Adaptive Foresight in the creative content industries: anticipating value chain transformations and need for policy action. Science and Public Policy, 37(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, A. D., & Andersen, P. D. (2014). Innovation system foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barré, R., & Keenan, M. (2008). Revisiting foresight rationales: What lessons from the social sciences and humanities? In C. Cagnin, et al. (Eds.), Future-oriented technology analysis—Strategic intelligence for an innovative economy. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butter, M., et al. (2008). Editors’ introduction to the European Foresight Monitoring Network. Foresight, 10(6), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2012). Complex adaptive innovation systems: Relatedness and transversality in the evolving region (Regions and Cities) (1st ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1962). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Santa Monica, CA: INFORMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, T., & Loogma, K. (2009). Constructing futures: A social constructionist perspective on foresight methodology. Futures, 41(2), 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou, L. (2001). Third generation foresight—Integrating the socio-economic dimension. NISTEP Study Material.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou, L., & Cassingena Harper, J. (2011). From priority-setting to articulation of demand: Foresight for research and innovation policy and strategy. Futures, 43(3), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou, L., Harper, J. C., & Scapolo, F. (2011). From priority-setting to societal challenges in future-oriented technology analysis. Futures, 43(3), 229–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou, L., et al. (2008). The handbook of technology foresight. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hideg, É. (2007). Theory and practice in the field of Foresight. Foresight, 9(6), 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J., & Martin, B. R. (1984). Foresight in science: Picking the winners. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. (1967). Technology forecasting in perspective. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Könnölä, T., Smith, J., & Eerola, A. (2009). Introduction: Future-oriented technology analysis—Impacts and implications for policy and decision making. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(9), 1135–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. R. (2014). R&D policy instruments—A critical review of what we do and don’t know, Aalborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I. (2008). From futures to foresight. In The handbook of technology foresight: Concepts and practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I. (2010). The development of technology foresight: A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(9), 1448–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Research Council. (2010). Foresight i Norge 2009. Mot et nytt kunnskapsfelt, Norwegian Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öner, M. A. (2010). On theory building in foresight and futures studies: A discussion note. Futures, 42(9), 1019–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oner, M. A., & Saritas, O. (2005). A systems approach to policy analysis and development planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(7), 886–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roveda, C., & Vecchiato, R. (2008). Foresight and innovation in the context of industrial clusters: The case of some Italian districts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(6), 817–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saritas, O. (2011). Systemic foresight methodology. In Forth International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA) FTA and Grand Societal Challenges—Shaping and Driving Structural and Systemic Transformations SEVILLE, May 12–13, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., Schaper-Rinkel, P., & Butter, M. (2009). Sectoral innovation foresight. Introduction/Interim Report, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Dannemand Andersen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andersen, P.D., Alkærsig, L. (2016). Profile and Trends of FTA and Foresight. In: Daim, T., Chiavetta, D., Porter, A., Saritas, O. (eds) Anticipating Future Innovation Pathways Through Large Data Analysis. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39056-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics