Skip to main content

Bell Inequalities with Retarded Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantum [Un]Speakables II

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

Abstract

We consider retarded settings in the context of a Bell-type experiment. The retarded setting is defined as the value the setting would have taken were it not for some external intervention (for example, by a human). We derive retarded Bell inequalities that explicitly take into account the retarded settings. These inequalities are not violated by Quantum Theory (or any other theory) when the retarded settings are equal to the actual settings. We construct a simple model that reproduces Quantum Theory when the retarded and actual settings are equal, but violates it when they are not. We discuss using humans to choose the settings in this type of experiment and the implications of a violation of Quantum Theory (in agreement with the retarded Bell inequalities) in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. Acin, N. Gisin, L. Masanes, From bells theorem to secure quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(12), 120405 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger, Experimental test of bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49(25), 1804 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Barrett, L. Hardy, A. Kent, No signaling and quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(1), 010503 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. S.J. Bell, On the einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox. Physics 1(3), 195–200 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.S. Bell, in La Nouvelle Cuisine. ed by A. Sarlemijn, P. Kroes. Between Science and Technology. (Elsevier, 1990), p. 97

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Bell, K Gottfried, M. Veltman (eds.), John S. Bell on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (World Scientific, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Č. Brukner, M. Żukowski, J.-W. Pan, A. Zeilinger, Bells inequalities and quantum communication complexity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(12), 127901 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. D.J Chalmers, The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (Oxford University Press, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. F.J. Clauser, M.A. Horne, Experimental Consequences of Objective Local Theories. Phys. Rev. D 10(2), 526 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  10. F.J. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23(15), 880 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Cleve, H. Buhrman, Substituting quantum entanglement for communication. Phys. Rev. A 56(2), 1201 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D.C. Dennett, Consciousness Explained (Penguin, UK, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Gallicchio, A.S. Friedman, D.I Kaiser, Testing bells inequality with cosmic photons: closing the setting-independence loophole. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(11), 110405 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Scheidl, R. Ursin, J. Kofler, S. Ramelow, X.-S. Ma, T. Herbst, L. Ratschbacher, A. Fedrizzi, N.K. Langford, T. Jennewein et al., Violation of local realism with freedom of choice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107(46), 19708–19713 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A.M. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 433–460 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, Violation of bell’s inequality under strict einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(23), 5039 (1998)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Zeilinger, Testing bell’s inequalities with periodic switching. Phys. Lett. A 118(1), 1–2 (1986)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to the late Euan Squires for discussions on this subject while I was doing my PhD under his supervision. Research at Perimeter Institute is supported by the Government of Canada through Industry Canada and by the Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation. This project was made possible in part through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucien Hardy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hardy, L. (2017). Bell Inequalities with Retarded Settings. In: Bertlmann, R., Zeilinger, A. (eds) Quantum [Un]Speakables II. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38987-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics