Skip to main content

Philosophy Made Visual: An Experimental Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 27))

  • 627 Accesses

Abstract

The advent of experimental philosophy has recently expanded the domain of philosophical debates so as to include discussions about survey-based methodology and the validity of its employment in philosophical inquiry. One of the main criticisms of this approach questions the alleged response-intuition equation, by claiming that ‘pragmatic cues’ might prevent the subjects from reporting their genuine intuitions about the survey scenarios and questions. The pragmatic cues discussed by the literature include aspects of a quite different nature, ranging from thinking-styles to semantic ambiguities. In order to distinguish between language-related pragmatic cues, and other features not strictly dependent on language, the distinction between the ‘response problem’ and the ‘interpretation problem’—potentially triggered by language-related pragmatic cues—is introduced. By employing an illustrated survey, this study aims at revealing the extent to which the use of ‘non-linguistic’ vignettes might constitute a valid aid to the traditional ‘linguistic’ vignette. A positive response would encourage the usage of illustrations and other non-linguistic or minimally-linguistic models in survey-based studies, which considerably restricts the liability of surveys for the interpretation problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I here shape the debate in terms of ‘rationalists’ versus ‘naturalists’ after Fisher and Collins (2015). Here ‘naturalism’ is to be regarded as a methodological stance totally independent from the metaphysical position.

  2. 2.

    Since the survey study conducted by Weinberg et al. (2001), the literature in experimental philosophy has sharply increased.

  3. 3.

    For example, see Michael Devitt’s recent appeal to linguists’ intuitions about linguistic usage, in addition to philosophers’ intuitions (Devitt 2012, 2014).

  4. 4.

    This worry can be seen in Cullen (2010), where he argues that people’s judgments are a kind of behavior generated by inputs of various sorts, as for example the subjects’ “beliefs about what the researchers are interested in” (pp. 277–278).

  5. 5.

    In the experimental philosophy literature, a case of ‘perspectival ambiguity’ has been recently discussed by Sytsma and Livengood (2011).

  6. 6.

    The minimal recourse to linguistic elements in the illustrations—let’s call them ‘minimally-linguistic illustrations’—does not hamper the very goal of the illustrated survey, and dates or names stand in the drawing as a sort of ‘Peircean index’.

  7. 7.

    Given the focus on the methodological problem, the data analysis will here be limited to the medium as a possible variation trigger. While the content of the vignettes is widely irrelevant with respect to the methodology issue, the collected data offer an occasion to check folk intuitions about the problem of object/person identity through time and change. The discussion of these data will be presented in a forthcoming paper.

  8. 8.

    For reasons of space, vignettes and their related questions in the illustrated survey are placed on different sheets, which is why the repetition of the illustrations is needed on the question page.

  9. 9.

    This paper offers the presentation and the results of the first phase of a cross-cultural research, and the same survey will be conducted with Western subject as to verify that the responses’ insensitivity to the non-linguistic medium is a cross-cultural one.

References

  • Alexander, J. (2012). Experimental philosophy. An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collett, J. L., & Childs, E. (2011). Minding the gap: Meaning, affect, and the potential shortcomings of vignettes. Social Science Research, 40, 513–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, S. (2010). Survey-driven romanticism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (2010). Intuitions, counter-examples, and experimental philosophy. Review of Philosophical Psychology, 1, 447–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (2015). The myth of the intuitive: Experimental philosophy and philosophical method. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M. (2012). Whither experimental semantics? Theoria, 27, 5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M. (2014). Linguistic intuitions and cognitive penetrability. In The baltic international yearbook of cognition, logic, and communication, Vol. 9. Perception and Concepts (pp. 1–14).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faia, M. A. (1980). The vagaries of the vignette world: A comment on Alves and Rossi. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 951–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E., & Collins, J. (2015). Rationalism and naturalism in the age of experimental philosophy. In E. Fischer & J. Collins (Eds.), Experimental philosophy, rationalism, and naturalism (pp. 3–33). Routledge, London and New York: Rethinking Philosophical Method.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, T., Ji, L. J., Spina, R., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Culture, temporal focus, and values of the past and the future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1030–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. (1998). Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug-injecting and HIV risk and safer behavior. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T., Kulesa, P., Young, I. C., & Shavitt, S. (2005). The relation between culture and response styles. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 264–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauppinen, A. (2007). The rise and fall of experimental philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 10 (2), 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H., & Alves, W. M. (1980). Rejoinder to Faia. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 954–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E. (2009). A defense of the use of intuitions in philosophy. In M. Bishop & D. Murphy (Eds.), Stich and his critics (pp. 101–112). Wiley-Blackwell: Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sytsma, J. (Ed.). (2014). Advances in experimental philosophy. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sytsma, J., & Livengood, J. (2011). A new perspective concerning experiments on semantic intuitions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89, 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, J. M., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 29 (1&2), 429–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2007). The philosophy of philosophy. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Angel Qiantong Wu for her assistance with the data collection and analysis, Sara Huang Yang for the drawings for the illustrated survey, as well as Mog Stapleton, Alessandra Fermani, and two anonymous referees who provided constructive comments for improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nevia Dolcini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dolcini, N. (2016). Philosophy Made Visual: An Experimental Study. In: Magnani, L., Casadio, C. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38983-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics