Abstract
Amidst intensified competition for land available to private investors in mining, industrial and commercial agriculture sectors, contests between transnational companies and communities over land are emerging in many countries as a significant domain of social conflict. This chapter examines the cases of two company-community conflicts over land in the Indian State of Odisha, in which communities and their supporters have mobilized to resist proposed new projects, drawing in various ways on rights-based discourses to articulate and support their claims. One conflict relates to the acquisition of land for a bauxite mining project involving the Indian-based and UK-listed company Vedanta, while the other concerns the construction of a mega steel complex by the South Korean company POSCO. We compare the strategies of mobilization and claim-making followed by communities in the two cases, asking why there have been different outcomes in these two conflicts despite striking similarities between them. We argue that the different dynamics and outcomes in the two cases have resulted from (sometimes subtle) differences between the cases with respect to in a combination of three factors: (a) the strength of local solidarity and organizational capacity, (b) the capacity of campaigners to recruit national political and civil society elites in support of community claims, and (c) the extent to which grassroots claims have been supported by transnational mobilization. Taken together, these three factors highlight the central importance of interactions between grassroots mobilization and the political actions of national and international ‘elites’ in shaping outcomes of company-community conflicts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alternative Law Forum (Delhi Forum). (2013). Captive democracy: Abuse of the criminal system and filing false cases to curb dissent against the POSCO steel plant in Orissa. Delhi: Alternative Law Forum (Delhi Forum).
Amnesty International. (2010). Executive summary of report: Don’t mine us out of existence: Bauxite mine and refinery devastates lives in India. London: Amnesty International.
Asher, M. (2009). Striking while the iron is hot: A case study of the Pohang Steel Company’s (POSCO) proposed project in Orissa. Pune: National Centre for Advocacy Studies.
Bijulal, M. V., Asher, M., Panikkar, S. & Chakravartty, S. (2007). Report of an independent fact finding team on Orissa’s POSCO project. Mainstream, XLV.
Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Business Standard. (2012, April 13). NHRC objects to private company buying land for Posco rehab colony. Business Standard.
Cerny, P. G. (2007). Multi-nodal politics: Toward a political process theory of globalization. Annual conference of the international political economy society. Stanford University.
Chakravarti, S. (2015). Development vs democracy. Live Mint.
Das, V. (2001). Mining bauxite, maiming people. Economic and Political Weekly, 36, 2612.
Dash, K. C., & Samal, K. C. (2008). New mega projects in Orissa: Protests by potential displaced persons. Social Change December, 38, 627–644.
Economic Times. (2010, March 17). Stop the Vedanta project in Orissa. Economic Times.
Economic Times. (2012). Visit of foreign nationals to Posco site restricted. Economic Times, 2 January.
Economic Times. (2014). India to leverage Korean development model. The Economic Times.
Editorial. (2010). Petition drive hopes to save India’s Dongria Kondh from destruction. Salem-News.com.
Government of India. (2005). National steel policy.
Hopkins, K. (2010, February 5). Church of England sells Vedanta stake over human rights concerns. The Guardian.
IBNLive. (2012, March 26). Korean investment a priority, Posco will happen: Manmohan Singh. IBNLive.
International Human Rights Clinic and ESCR-Net. (2013). The price of steel: Human rights and forced evictions in the POSCO-India project. New York: NYU School of Law.
Korean National Contact Point. (2013). Initial assessment of complaint on violation of OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Seoul: Korean National Contact Point.
Kraemer, R., Whiteman, G., & Banerjee, B. (2013). Conflict and astroturfing in Niyamgiri: The importance of national advocacy networks in anti-corporate social movements. Organization Studies, 34, 823–852.
Kumar, K. (2013). The sacred mountain: Confronting global capital at Niyamgiri. Geoforum.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mining Zone Peoples’ Solidarity Group. (2010). Iron and steal: The POSCO-India story. USA: Mining Zone Peoples’ Solidarity Group.
Mining Zone Peoples’ Solidarity Group. (2012). Pull your pension money out of POSCO. Urges New Educational Video for the European Public. Available from: http://miningzone.org/campaigns/posco/divestment
Mishra, D. K. (2011). Behind dispossession: State, land grabbing and agrarian change in rural Orissa. In International conference on global land grabbing, 2011 Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
NDTV. (2010, August 26). Rahul Gandhi to Orissa tribals: You have saved Niyamgiri. NDTV.
Netherlands National Contact Point. (2013). Initial statement ABP/APG—Lok Shakti Abhiyan, KTNC watch, fair green and global alliance, forum for environment and development. Amsterdam: Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Government of Netherlands.
Norwegian Council on Ethics. (2007). Council of ethics recommendation regarding Vedanta resources. Council on Ethics – Government Pension Fund – Global.
Norwegian National Contact Point. (2013). Final statement: Complaint from Lok Shakti Abhiyan, Korean transnational corporations watch, fair green and global alliance and forum for environment and development vs POSCO (South Korea), ABP/APG (Netherlands) and NBIM (Norway). Oslo: Norwegian National Contact Point.
Padel, F., & Das, S. (2007). Adivasis shining: Standing up to the face of an invasion of aluminium companies in Orissa. In B. S. Nayak (Ed.), Nationalizing crises: The political economy of public policy in contemporary India. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers.
Pattnaik, S. K. (2011). A case study from India. Organising and mobilising in people centred advocacy in South Asia. Pune: National Centre for Advocacy Studies.
Pingle, U., Pandey, D. & Suresh, V. (2010). Majority report of the committee constituted to investigate into the proposal submitted by POSCO India Pvt. Limited for establishment of an Integrated Steel Plant and Captive Port in Jagatsinghpur District, Orissa. New Delhi: Submitted to Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
POSCO-India. (2013). POSCO’s Odisha project in India, December 2013. Bhubaneshwar: POSCO-India.
Public Union for Civil Liberties. (2003). A fact-finding report on physical attack on the villagers agitating against their displacement due to the proposed Sterlite Alumina project in Lanjigarh Block of Kalahandi District, Bhubaneswar.
Roy, A. (2009, November 9). Mr Chidambaram’s War. Outlook India Magazine.
Sahu, S. K., & Dash, M. (2011). Expropriation of land and cultures: The Odisha story and beyond. Social Change, 41, 251.
Saika, S. P. (2014, January 12). Govt rejects Vedanta’s Niyamgiri mining project. The Hindu Business Line.
Samadrusti Television. (2011). Anti Posco Andolan: The right to protest. YouTube [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJDy_RQJxUE. Accessed 5 Feb 2015.
Samadrusti Television. (2013). Bombing in POSCO area: When we don’t question. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=565aksMHUAA. Accessed 5 Feb 2015.
Saxena, N. C., Parasuraman, S., Kant, P., & Baviskar, A. (2010). Report of the four member committee for investigation into the proposal submitted by the Orissa mining company for bauxite mining in Niyamgiri. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment & Forests.
Swain, A. (2000). Social capital and popular mobilisation: Studying environmental protests in an Indian state. Asian Journal of Political Science, 8, 33.
UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2013). India: Urgent call to halt Odisha mega-steel project amid serious human rights concerns. Geneva: United Nations.
World Bank. (2006). India: Unlocking opportunities for forest-dependent people in India. South Asia Region: Agriculutre and Rural Development Sector Unit.
Xaxa, V. (2012). Identity, power, and development: The Kondhs in Orissa, India. In S. Sawyer & E. T. Gomez (Eds.), The politics of resource extraction: Indigenous peoples, multinational corporations and the state. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Macdonald, K., Marshall, S., Balaton-Chrimes, S. (2017). Demanding Rights in Company-Community Resource Extraction Conflicts: Examining the Cases of Vedanta and POSCO in Odisha, India. In: Grugel, J., Nem Singh, J., Fontana, L., Uhlin, A. (eds) Demanding Justice in The Global South. Development, Justice and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38821-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38821-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38820-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38821-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)