Abstract
Within the literature on sustainable urban development, the dominant view is that dense and concentrated cities produce lower environmental strain than do sprawling and land-consuming cities. But is there a danger that environmentally favourable urban planning solutions will be counteracted by oppositely working mechanisms? In the literature, two partly related main types of such effects have been particularly discussed: (1) A greater amount of leisure travel (including flights) when people save money and time from living in an urban context that does not require much daily-life travel; and (2) increased vacation home ownership and use as a compensation for dense daily living environments. These counteracting mechanisms include genuine rebound effects as well as compensatory effects resulting from perceived unsatisfactory characteristics of ‘eco-efficient’ residential environments. In practice, the demarcation between rebound effects and compensatory mechanisms resulting from ecological modernization strategies in urban planning is often blurred. This chapter draws on research carried out by the author in Norwegian and Danish cities and compares this against international literature on the topic. The paper concludes that rebound effects exist, counteracting to some extent the effects of resource-saving principles in urban planning. Avoiding such effects seems impossible unless the purchasing power decreases. The existence of rebound effects should, however, not prevent us from seeking to develop our cities in as environmentally friendly ways as possible.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Age, gender, workforce participation, income, education level, and number of children in the household aged below 7 and 7–17.
References
P.G. Berg, Rörlighet och Rotfashet: Ett Humanbiologiskt Perspektiv på FramtidensTransporter och Kommunikationer (Liber Hermods, Malmö, 1996)
CEC (Commission of the European Communities), Green Paper on the Urban Environment (Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1990)
W. Christaller, Central Places in Southern Germany (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1966) (NJTranslation of Die Zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland, published in 1933)
M. Dijst, M. Lanzendorf, A. Barendregt, L. Smit, Second homes in Germany and the Netherlands: ownership and travel impact explained. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 96(2), 139–152 (2005)
E. Holden, I.T. Norland, Three challenges for the compact city as a sustainable urban form: household consumption of energy and transport in eight residential areas in the greater Oslo region. Urban Stud. 42(12), 2145–2166 (2005)
M. Jenks, E. Burton, K. Williams (eds.), The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? (E & FN Spon, London, 1996)
F. Kaiser, Mobilität als Wohnproblem - Ortsbindung im Licht der emotionalen Regulation (Peter Lang Publishing Group, Bern, 1993)
M. Kennedy, Ekologisk stadsplanering i Europa (Ecological urban planning in Europe), in Den Miljövänliga Staden – en Utopi? Rapport Från en Seminarieserie vid Institutionen för Tillämpad Miljövetenskap, ed. by Göteborgs Universitet Division of Applied Environmental Science (University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 1995), pp 25–31
B. Lefévre, Urban transport energy consumption: determinants and strategies for its reduction. Sapiens 2, 1–17 (2010)
J. A. Modenes, J. Lopez-Colas, Second homes and compact cities in Spain: two elements of the same system? Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 98(3), 325–335 (2007)
P.W.G. Newman, J.R. Kenworthy, Sustainability and Cities. Overcoming Automobile Dependence (Island Press, Washington, DC, 1999)
T. S. Nielsen, Boliglokalisering og transport i Aalborg. Ph.D. dissertation. Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg (2002)
M. Norris, N. Winston, Second-home owners: escaping, investing or retiring? Tourism Geographies Int J Tourism Space Place Environ 12(4), 546–567 (2010)
P. Næss, Transportation energy in Swedish towns and regions. Scand. Hous. Plan. Res. 10(4), 187–206 (1993)
P. Næss, Urban planning and sustainable development. Eur. Plan. Stud. 9(4), 503–524 (2001)
P. Næss, O.B. Jensen, Urban structure matters, even in a small town. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 47(1), 35–56 (2004)
P. Næss, Residential location affects travel behavior—but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Prog. Plan. 63(2), 167–257 (2005)
P. Næss, Are short daily trips compensated by higher leisure mobility? Environ. Plan. B, 33(2), 197–220 (2006a)
P. Næss, Urban Structure Matters: Residential Location, Car Dependence and Travel Behaviour (Routledge, New York, London, 2006b)
P. Næss, Residential self-selection and appropriate control variables in land use-travel studies. Transp. Rev. 29(3), 293–324 (2009)
P. Næss, Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context. J. Transp. Land Use 5(2), 21–45 (2012)
P. Næss, Residential location, transport rationales and daily-life travel behavior: the case of Hangzhou metropolitan area, China. Prog. Plan. 79(1), 1–50 (2013)
P. Næss, Tempest in a teapot: the exaggerated problem of transport-related residential self-selection as a source of error in empirical studies. J. Transp. Land Use 7(3), 57–77 (2014)
P. Næss, The RESACTRA project. Presentation at a Meeting Organized by Research Council Norway and the Ministry of Climate and the Environment (Oslo, 2015a)
P. Næss, The explanatory qualitative-quantitative method. Chapter 6, in Mobility Patterns and Urban Structure, ed P. Pinho, C Silva (Ashgate, Farnham, 2015b), pp. 101–120
P. Næss, P.G. Røe, S.L. Larsen, Travelling distances, modal split and transportation energy in thirty residential areas in Oslo. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 38(3), 349–370 (1995)
P. Næss, S.L. Sandberg, P.G. Røe, Energy use for transportation in 22 Nordic Towns. Scand. Hous. Plan. Res. 13(2), 79–97 (1996)
P. Næss, T. Næss, A. Strand, Oslo’s farewell to urban sprawl. Eur. Plan. Stud. 19(1), 113–139 (2011a)
P. Næss, A. Strand, T. Næss, M. Nicolaisen, On their road to sustainability? The challenge of sustainable mobility in urban planning and development in two Scandinavian capital regions. Town Plan. Rev. 82(3), 287–317 (2011b)
M. Ornetzeder et al., The environmental effect of car-free housing: a case in Vienna. Ecol. Econ. 65(3), 516–530 (2008)
A. Schafer, D. Victor, The past and future of global mobility. Sci. Am. 277, 36–39 (1997)
R. Schlich, K.W. Axhausen, Wohnumfeld un Freizeitverkehröeine Untersuchung zur Fluchttheorie. Arbeitsberichte Verkehr- und Raumplanung 155 (ETH/IVT, Zurich) (2002)
A. Strandell, C.M. Hall, Impact of the residential environment on second home use in Finland—testing the compensation hypothesis. Landscape Urban Plan. 133, 12–23 (2015)
K. Tillberg, Barnfamiljers dagliga fritidsresor i bilsamhället - ett tidspussel med geografiska og könsmässiga variationer. Geografiska regionstudier nr. 43. Uppsala University, Uppsala (2001)
B. Vilhelmson, Vår Dagliga Rörlighet: om Resandets Utveckling, Fördelning och Gränser. TFB report 1990. Swedish Transportation Research Board, Stockholm; now the Swedish Transportation and Communications Research Board (1990), p. 16
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Næss, P. (2016). Urban Planning: Residential Location and Compensatory Behaviour in Three Scandinavian Cities. In: Santarius, T., Walnum, H., Aall, C. (eds) Rethinking Climate and Energy Policies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38807-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38807-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38805-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38807-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)