Abstract
The basic premise of dual scaling/correspondence analysis lies in the simultaneous or symmetric analysis of rows and columns of the data matrix, a task that resembles the analysis of principal component analysis of both the person-to-person correlation matrix and the item-by-item correlation matrix together. Our main quest: whether or not we can represent both analyses in the same Euclidean space. The traditional graphical methods are very problematic: symmetric display or French plot suffers from the discrepancy between the row space and the column space; non-symmetric display involves the projection of data onto standardized space, which does not contain coordinate information in the data; a variety of biplots, of which criticisms we rarely see, involve operations that do not typically maintain row and column measurements on the equal metrics, or if they do they are not the coordinates of the data. Thus, none of these provides a precise description of complex information in data, hence failing in the basic objective of symmetric data analysis. This paper will identify logical problems of the current practice and offers a justifiable alternative to joint graphical display. “Graphing is believing” may in reality remain to be a wishful thinking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bock, R. D. (1960). Methods and applications of optimal scaling. The University of North Carolina Psychometric Laboratory Research Memorandum, No. 25.
Carroll, J. D., Green, P. E., & Schaffer, C. M. (1986). Interpoint distance comparison in correspondence analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 271–280.
De Leeuw, J. (1973). Canonical analysis of categorical data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Escofier-Cordier, B. (1969). L’analyse factorielle des correspondances. Bureau Universitaire de Recherche Operationnele. Cahiers, SérieRecherche (Université de Paris), 13, 25–29.
Greenacre, M. J. (1989). The Carroll-Green-Schaffer scaling in correspondence analysis: A theoretical and empirical appraisal. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 358–365.
Guttman, L. (1941). The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and method of scale construction. In P. Horst et al. (Eds.), The Prediction of Personal Adjustment (pp. 319–348). New York, NY: Social Research Council.
Hayashi, C. (1950). On the quantification of qualitative data from mathematico-statistical point of view. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2, 35–47.
Hirschfeld, H.O. (1935). A connection between correlation and contingency. Cambridge Philosophical Society Proceedings, 31, 520–524.
Horst, P. (1935). Measuring complex attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 369–374.
Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Tabard, N. (1977). Tecnniques de la description statistique: Méthodes et l’ogiciels pour l’analyse des grands tableaux. Paris, France: Dunod.
Nishisato, S. (1980). Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Nishisato, S. (1996). Gleaning in the field of dual scaling. Psychometrika, 1996(61), 559–599.
Nishisato, S. (1997). Graphing is believing: Interpretable graphs for dual scaling. In J. Blasius & M. J. Greenacre (Eds.), Visualization of categorical data (pp. 185–196). London, England: Academic.
Nishisato, S. (2007). Multidimensional nonlinear descriptive analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Nishisato, S. (2012). Quantification theory: Reminiscence and a step forward. In W. Gaul, A. Geyer-Schults, I. Schmidt-Thieme, & J. Kunze (Eds.), Challenges and the interface of data analysis, computer science and optimization (pp. 109–119). New York, NY: Springer.
Nishisato, S. (2014). Structural representation of categorical data and cluster analysis through filters. In W. Gaul, A. Guyer-Schultz, A. Baba, & A. Okada (Eds.), German-Japanese interchange of data analysis results (pp. 81–90). New York, NY: Springer.
Nishisato, S., & Clavel, J. G. (2008). A note on between-set distances in dual scaling and correspondence analysis. Behaviormetrika, 30, 87–98.
Nishisato, S., & Clavel, J. G. (2010). Total information analysis: Comprehensive dual scaling. Behaviormetrika, 37, 15–32.
Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and Methods of Scaling. New York, NY: Wiley.
Young, G., & Householder, A. A. (1938). Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances. Psychometrika, 3, 19–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nishisato, S. (2016). Multidimensional Joint Graphical Display of Symmetric Analysis: Back to the Fundamentals. In: van der Ark, L., Bolt, D., Wang, WC., Douglas, J., Wiberg, M. (eds) Quantitative Psychology Research. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 167. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38759-8_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38759-8_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38757-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38759-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)