Abstract
Social participation following acquired disability is an important focus of rehabilitation for all members of the interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. Evidence demonstrates that social participation leads to increased life satisfaction and quality of life [1, 2]. However, “the presence of disability has been found to lead to participation that is less diverse, is located more in the home, involves fewer social relationships, and includes less active recreation” [3]. When individuals with disabilities return to their homes and communities, they often encounter psychological and physical barriers that limit their social participation. Historically the problems of people with disabilities were perceived to be more social and psychological rather than physical; however, later research examining all potential barriers found physical, medical, and political barriers to be more difficult [4]. This chapter outlines these barriers, highlights assessments to help identify or measure the barriers, provides interventions to overcome them, and expected outcomes of these interventions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kalpinski R, Williamson M, Elliott T, Berry J, Underhill A, Fine P. Modeling the prospective relationships of impairment, injury severity, and participation to quality of life following traumatic brain injury. Biomed Res Int. 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/102570.
Erosa N, Berry J, Elliott T, Underhill A, Fine P. Predicting quality of life 5 years after medical discharge for traumatic spinal cord injury. Br Psychol Soc. 2013. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12063.
Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life, 2002 distinguished scholar lecture. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:640–9.
Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1793–803.
American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process. 2nd ed. Am J Occup Ther. 2008;62:625–83. Original quotation from: Mosey A. Applied scientific inquiry in the health professions: an epistemological orientation. 2nd ed. Bethesda: American Occupational Therapy Association; 1996.
Lewin K. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1969.
Noreau L, Boschen K. Intersection of participation and environmental factors: a complex interactive process. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(9 Suppl 1):S44–53.
Vilchinsky N, Findler L. Attitudes toward Israel’s equal rights for people with disabilities law: a multiperspective approach. Rehabil Psychol. 2004;49(4):309–16. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.49.4.309.
World Health Organization. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
Cushman L, Scherer MA. Pilot study of perceived needs of persons with new spinal cord injury. Psychol Rep. 2002;90:1153–60.
Post MW, van Dijk AJ, van Asbeck FW, Schrijvers AJ. Life satisfaction of persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;78:395–401.
Hwang JE, Cvitanovich DC, Doroski EK, Vajarakitipongse JG. Correlations between quality of life and adaptation factors among people with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65:661–9. doi:10.5014/ajot.2011.001487.
Lysack CL, Neufeld S. Occupational therapist home evaluations: inequalities, but doing the best we can? Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:369–79.
Americans with Disabilities Act. 2013. http://www.ada.gov. Accessed 13 Dec 2013.
Stark S, Hollingsworth H, Morgan K, Gray DB. Development of a measure of receptivity of the physical environment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(2):123–37.
Washington University in Saint Louis—School of Medicine, editor. Community based outcome measures. 2013. https://enablemob.wustl.edu/DBTAC/WebSurveyStudy/CHEC.html. Accessed 13 Dec 2013.
Whiteneck G, Harrison-Felix C, Mellick D, Brooks C, Charlifue S, Gerhart K. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1324–35.
Chan F, Livneh H, Pruett S, Wang CC, Zheng LX. Societal attitudes toward disability: concepts, measurements, and interventions. In: Chan F, Cardoso ED, Chronister JA, editors. Understanding psychosocial adjustment to chronic illness and disability: a handbook for evidence-based practitioners in rehabilitation. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 333–67.
Wright BA. Physical disability: a psychosocial approach. 2nd ed. New York: Harper Collins; 1983.
Yuker HE. Variables that influence attitudes toward persons with disabilities: conclusions from the data. Psychosoc Perspect Disability. 1994;9:3–22.
Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1963.
Price P, Stephenson S, Krantz L, Ward K. Beyond my front door: the occupational and social participation of adults with spinal cord injury. Occup Participation Health. 2011;31:81–8.
Stone SD. Reactions to invisible disability: the experiences of young women survivors of hemorrhagic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(6):293–304.
Corrigan PW, Penn DL. Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. Am Psychol. 1999;54:765–76.
Livneh H, Chan F, Kaya A. Stigma related to physical and sensory disabilities. In: Corrigan P, editor. The stigma of disease and disability: understanding causes and overcoming injustices. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2014. p. 93–120.
Olkin R. What psychotherapists should know about disability. New York: Guilford; 1999.
Williams P, Schoultz B. We can speak for ourselves: self-advocacy by mentally handicapped people. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1982.
Test DW, Fowler CH, Wood WM, Brewer DM, Eddy S. A conceptual framework of self-advocacy for students with disabilities. Remedial Spec Educ. 2005;26:43–54.
Newman S. Evidence-based advocacy: using photovoice to identify barriers and facilitators to community participation after spinal cord injury. Rehabil Nurs. 2010;35:47–59.
Cox DR. Board certification in professional psychology: promoting competency and consumer protection. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24:493–505.
Cox DR, Cox RH, Caplan B. Consumer protection in specialty competencies in rehabilitation psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Chan F, Pruett S, Kubota C, Lee EJ, Kwok LF. Effect of impression management on job interview outcomes of people with disabilities: an experimental study. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Small Business and Innovative Research Grant Final Report; 2008.
Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Boschen K. Perceived influence of the environment on social participation among individuals with spinal cord injury. Topics Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2002;7:56–72.
Carpenter C, Forwell SJ, Jongbloed LE, Backman CL. Community participation after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:427–33.
Reid D, Angus J, McKeever P, Miller KL. Home is where their wheels are: experiences of women wheelchair users. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:186–95.
Esmail S, Darry K, Walter A, Knupp H. Attitudes and perceptions towards disability and sexuality. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:1148–55.
Redick AG, McClain L, Brown C. Consumer empowerment through occupational therapy: The Americans With Disabilities Act Title III. Am J Occup Ther. 2000;54:207–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuemmel, A., Powell, K. (2017). Social Participation and Ability/Disability. In: Budd, M., Hough, S., Wegener, S., Stiers, W. (eds) Practical Psychology in Medical Rehabilitation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34034-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34034-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34032-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34034-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)