Skip to main content

Technologies of (Re)production in Mathematics Education Research: Performances of Progress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Disorder of Mathematics Education

Abstract

In this chapter, I use Foucauldian theory to consider and critique the role of technologies of power, surveillance and governmentality within mathematics education research. I argue this deconstruction is pertinent within our current neoliberal, market-driven education system, as both schools and universities are involved in overt and covert methods of governing. Moreover, this era is predicated on the fiction of the free, autonomous self, and discourses of “becoming”. I examine this argument through the deconstruction of a key taken-for-granted truth of mathematics education research within the UK and other Western contexts, such as the USA and Australia—that it is heavily and uncritically invested in progress, progressive pedagogies and the “free” autonomous subject. I argue that this position relies on a “natural” mathematical child, who is posited as asocial, acultural and apolitical, where the focus is on what is to come, not what is already. Instead I suggest that mathematics education, and the mathematical child, are not natural but instead are social, cultural and political products. The natural, developmental, “free”, child is (re)produced through both overt and covert surveillance, and monitoring from both schools and universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. J. (1994). Innocence and experience: Reconstructing primary education. Trentham: Stoke-on-Trent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. J. (Ed.). (2010). Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (2003). The state and the politics of knowledge. New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1993). Education markets, choice and social class: The market as a class strategy in the UK and the USA. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. Basingstoke: Communications and Culture.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2009). The elephant in the classroom: Helping children learn and love maths. London: Souvenir Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2001). Politics out of history. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Clarke, D. (2013). Institutional context for research in mathematics education. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 459–484). New York, London: Spinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (1992). Development psychology and the postmodern child. In J. Doherty, E. Graham, & M. Malek (Eds.), Postmodernism and the social sciences. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (2008). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E., & Parker, I. (1993). Discourse analytic research. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (Vol. 1). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotoi, C. (2011). Neoliberalism: A Foucauldian perspective. International Review of Social Research, 1(2), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (2001). Shaping the sociology of education over half-a-century. In J. Demaine (Ed.), Sociology of education today (pp. 5–29). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1902/1956). The child and the curriculum; and the school and society. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, J. (1985). Beacons of the future: Schooling, subjection and subjectification. In V. Beechey & J. Donald (Eds.), Subjectivity and social relations (pp. 214–249). Milton Keyes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1987). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs, 12(4), 621–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977/1991). Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978/1998). The history of sexuality (volume one): The will to knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (pp. 109–133). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). Space, knowledge and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 239–256). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1989). Power affects the body. In S. Lotringer (Ed.), Foucault live: Collected interviews, 1961-1984 (pp. 207–213). New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003a). Governmentality. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 229–245). New York, London: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003b). Questions of method. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 246–258). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003c). The subject and power. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 126–144). New York, London: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003d). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 43–57). New York, London: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, P. (Ed.). (2001). Issues in mathematics teaching. London, New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilead, T. (2012). Education and the logic of economic progress. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(1), 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grek, S., Lawna, M., Lingard, B., & Varjoc, J. (2009). North by northwest: Quality assurance and evaluation processes in European education. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, T. (2007). Problematizing the construct of “the Chinese learner”: Insights from ethnographic research. Educational Studies, 33(3), 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L., & Corbett-Whittier, C. (2013). Using case study in education research. London; Thousand Oaks CA; New Delhi; Singapore: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (Eds.). (1998). Changing the subject. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultqvist, K., & Dahlberg, G. (Eds.). (2001). Governing the child in the new millennium. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D. W. (2007). Marketing education: The rise of standardized testing, accountability, competition, and markets in public education. In E. W. Ross & R. Gibson (Eds.), Neoliberalism and education reform. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, C. (1996). Childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (1998). The culture the learner brings: A bridge or a barrier? In M. Bryam & M. Fleming (Eds.), Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography (pp. 98–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, A. (2012). Unpacking understanding: The (re)search for the Holy Grail of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, A., & Mendick, H. (2011). Does every child count? Quality, equity and mathematics with/in neoliberalism. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 49–62). Dordrecht, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, S. (2012). Hating school, loving mathematics: On the ideological function of critique and reform in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendick, H. (2011). Is progress good for mathematics/education? Paper presented at the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moi, T. (1988). Feminism, postmodernism, and style: Recent feminist criticism in the United States. Cultural Critique, 9, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oancea, A., & Pring, R. (2008). The importance of being thorough: On systematic accumulations of “What Works” in education research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 15–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving and Financial. Literacy: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J., Simola, H., Varjo, J., Segerholm, C., & Pitkanen, H. (2011). Central-local relations of governance. In J. Ozga, P. Dahler-Larsen, C. Segerholm, & H. Simola (Eds.), Fabricating quality in education. Data and governance in Europe (pp. 107–126). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A. (2013). Conversation 2: Theory to analyze the macro dimension of classroom interactions. Paper presented at the Mathematics, Education and Contemporary Theory 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969/2000). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, B. (1996). Foucault and the politics of resistance. Polity, 28(4), 445–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. (1988). Educational reform: Rhetoric, ritual and social interest. Educational Theory, 38(1), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pring, R. (1989). Subject-centred versus child-centred education—a false dualism. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 6(2), 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2014). On teachers and students: An ethical cultural-historical perspective. Paper presented at the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out society. Accounting Organisation and Society, 15(7), 673–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999a). Governing the soul (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999b). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. (1763/1884). Emile, or, concerning education: Extracts, containing the principle elements of pedagogy found in the first three books/by Jean-Jacques Rousseau; with an introduction and notes by Jules Steeg. London, DC: Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad-Filho, A., & Johnston, D. (Eds.). (2005). Neoliberalism: A critical reader. London, Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valero, P. (2002). The myth of the active learner: From cognitive to socio-political interpretations of students in mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the Mathematics Education and Society, Helsingør, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1997). Redefining the subject in situated cognition theory. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 57–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1998a). Counting girls out: Girls and mathematics (2nd ed.). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1998b). Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early education. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 153–202). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V., & Lucey, H. (1989). Democracy in the Kitchen. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshaw, M. (2007). Working with Foucault in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Llewellyn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Llewellyn, A. (2017). Technologies of (Re)production in Mathematics Education Research: Performances of Progress. In: Straehler-Pohl, H., Bohlmann, N., Pais, A. (eds) The Disorder of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34005-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34006-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics