Abstract
In this chapter, I use Foucauldian theory to consider and critique the role of technologies of power, surveillance and governmentality within mathematics education research. I argue this deconstruction is pertinent within our current neoliberal, market-driven education system, as both schools and universities are involved in overt and covert methods of governing. Moreover, this era is predicated on the fiction of the free, autonomous self, and discourses of “becoming”. I examine this argument through the deconstruction of a key taken-for-granted truth of mathematics education research within the UK and other Western contexts, such as the USA and Australia—that it is heavily and uncritically invested in progress, progressive pedagogies and the “free” autonomous subject. I argue that this position relies on a “natural” mathematical child, who is posited as asocial, acultural and apolitical, where the focus is on what is to come, not what is already. Instead I suggest that mathematics education, and the mathematical child, are not natural but instead are social, cultural and political products. The natural, developmental, “free”, child is (re)produced through both overt and covert surveillance, and monitoring from both schools and universities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. J. (1994). Innocence and experience: Reconstructing primary education. Trentham: Stoke-on-Trent.
Alexander, R. J. (Ed.). (2010). Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. Abingdon: Routledge.
Apple, M. W. (2003). The state and the politics of knowledge. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Ball, S. J. (1993). Education markets, choice and social class: The market as a class strategy in the UK and the USA. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14(1), 3–19.
Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Ball, S. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. Basingstoke: Communications and Culture.
Boaler, J. (2009). The elephant in the classroom: Helping children learn and love maths. London: Souvenir Press.
Brown, W. (2001). Politics out of history. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Brown, T., & Clarke, D. (2013). Institutional context for research in mathematics education. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 459–484). New York, London: Spinger.
Burman, E. (1992). Development psychology and the postmodern child. In J. Doherty, E. Graham, & M. Malek (Eds.), Postmodernism and the social sciences. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Burman, E. (2008). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.
Burman, E., & Parker, I. (1993). Discourse analytic research. London, New York: Routledge.
Clarke, D., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (Vol. 1). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Cotoi, C. (2011). Neoliberalism: A Foucauldian perspective. International Review of Social Research, 1(2), 109–124.
Dale, R. (2001). Shaping the sociology of education over half-a-century. In J. Demaine (Ed.), Sociology of education today (pp. 5–29). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Dewey, J. (1902/1956). The child and the curriculum; and the school and society. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.
Donald, J. (1985). Beacons of the future: Schooling, subjection and subjectification. In V. Beechey & J. Donald (Eds.), Subjectivity and social relations (pp. 214–249). Milton Keyes: Open University Press.
du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.
Flax, J. (1987). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs, 12(4), 621–643.
Foucault, M. (1977/1991). Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1978/1998). The history of sexuality (volume one): The will to knowledge. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (pp. 109–133). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1984). Space, knowledge and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 239–256). London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1989). Power affects the body. In S. Lotringer (Ed.), Foucault live: Collected interviews, 1961-1984 (pp. 207–213). New York: Semiotext(e).
Foucault, M. (2003a). Governmentality. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 229–245). New York, London: The New Press.
Foucault, M. (2003b). Questions of method. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 246–258). New York: The New Press.
Foucault, M. (2003c). The subject and power. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 126–144). New York, London: The New Press.
Foucault, M. (2003d). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. 43–57). New York, London: The New Press.
Gates, P. (Ed.). (2001). Issues in mathematics teaching. London, New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Gilead, T. (2012). Education and the logic of economic progress. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(1), 113–131.
Grek, S., Lawna, M., Lingard, B., & Varjoc, J. (2009). North by northwest: Quality assurance and evaluation processes in European education. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 121–133.
Grimshaw, T. (2007). Problematizing the construct of “the Chinese learner”: Insights from ethnographic research. Educational Studies, 33(3), 299–311.
Hamilton, L., & Corbett-Whittier, C. (2013). Using case study in education research. London; Thousand Oaks CA; New Delhi; Singapore: Sage.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (Eds.). (1998). Changing the subject. London, New York: Routledge.
Hultqvist, K., & Dahlberg, G. (Eds.). (2001). Governing the child in the new millennium. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Hursh, D. W. (2007). Marketing education: The rise of standardized testing, accountability, competition, and markets in public education. In E. W. Ross & R. Gibson (Eds.), Neoliberalism and education reform. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Jenks, C. (1996). Childhood. London: Routledge.
Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (1998). The culture the learner brings: A bridge or a barrier? In M. Bryam & M. Fleming (Eds.), Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography (pp. 98–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Llewellyn, A. (2012). Unpacking understanding: The (re)search for the Holy Grail of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 385–399.
Llewellyn, A., & Mendick, H. (2011). Does every child count? Quality, equity and mathematics with/in neoliberalism. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 49–62). Dordrecht, New York: Springer.
Lundin, S. (2012). Hating school, loving mathematics: On the ideological function of critique and reform in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 73–85.
MacLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Mendick, H. (2011). Is progress good for mathematics/education? Paper presented at the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, London.
Moi, T. (1988). Feminism, postmodernism, and style: Recent feminist criticism in the United States. Cultural Critique, 9, 3–22.
Oancea, A., & Pring, R. (2008). The importance of being thorough: On systematic accumulations of “What Works” in education research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 15–39.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving and Financial. Literacy: OECD Publishing.
Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.
Ozga, J., Simola, H., Varjo, J., Segerholm, C., & Pitkanen, H. (2011). Central-local relations of governance. In J. Ozga, P. Dahler-Larsen, C. Segerholm, & H. Simola (Eds.), Fabricating quality in education. Data and governance in Europe (pp. 107–126). London: Routledge.
Pais, A. (2013). Conversation 2: Theory to analyze the macro dimension of classroom interactions. Paper presented at the Mathematics, Education and Contemporary Theory 2.
Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969/2000). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Pickett, B. (1996). Foucault and the politics of resistance. Polity, 28(4), 445–466.
Popkewitz, T. (1988). Educational reform: Rhetoric, ritual and social interest. Educational Theory, 38(1), 77–93.
Popkewitz, T. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Pring, R. (1989). Subject-centred versus child-centred education—a false dualism. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 6(2), 181–194.
Radford, L. (2014). On teachers and students: An ethical cultural-historical perspective. Paper presented at the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vancouver, Canada.
Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out society. Accounting Organisation and Society, 15(7), 673–692.
Rose, N. (1999a). Governing the soul (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.
Rose, N. (1999b). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau, J. (1763/1884). Emile, or, concerning education: Extracts, containing the principle elements of pedagogy found in the first three books/by Jean-Jacques Rousseau; with an introduction and notes by Jules Steeg. London, DC: Heath and Company.
Saad-Filho, A., & Johnston, D. (Eds.). (2005). Neoliberalism: A critical reader. London, Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Valero, P. (2002). The myth of the active learner: From cognitive to socio-political interpretations of students in mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the Mathematics Education and Society, Helsingør, Denmark.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London and New York: Routledge.
Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.
Walkerdine, V. (1997). Redefining the subject in situated cognition theory. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 57–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Walkerdine, V. (1998a). Counting girls out: Girls and mathematics (2nd ed.). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.
Walkerdine, V. (1998b). Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early education. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 153–202). London, New York: Routledge.
Walkerdine, V., & Lucey, H. (1989). Democracy in the Kitchen. London: Virago.
Walshaw, M. (2007). Working with Foucault in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Llewellyn, A. (2017). Technologies of (Re)production in Mathematics Education Research: Performances of Progress. In: Straehler-Pohl, H., Bohlmann, N., Pais, A. (eds) The Disorder of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34005-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34006-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)