Skip to main content

Intercontinental Networks Between Africa and Asia Across the Indian Ocean: What Do Village Chickens Reveal?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Early Exchange between Africa and the Wider Indian Ocean World

Part of the book series: Palgrave Series in Indian Ocean World Studies ((IOWS))

  • 750 Accesses

Abstract

The prehistory of the Indian Ocean world can be likened to a complex historical jigsaw puzzle, and has attracted deep interest from various disciplines (Chaudhuri 1985; Pearson 2011). The objective has been to find and fit together the various pieces to complete and demystify the puzzle. At present, the assembled pieces reveal a multiplex pattern of cultural contacts, trade, and biological translocations, including intercontinental linkages and interactions that shifted according to region and over time.

I would like to extend my gratitude to the University of Nottingham and the International Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA) for access to library and computer facilities and for giving me time to write this chapter. Special thanks go to Gwyn Campbell for his valuable comments on an earlier version of this chapter and for extending the invitation and encouraging me to put together this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adebambo, A.O., et al. 2010. Lack of Phylogeographic Structure in Nigerian Village Chicken Revealed by Mitochondrial DNA D-loop Sequence Analysis. International Journal of Poultry Science. 9(5): 503–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qamashoui, B. 2014. Towards Conservation of Omani Local Chicken: Management, Performance and Genetic Diversity. PhD Thesis, Georg-August-Universitat, Gottingen. Gottingen, Germany: Cuvillier Verlag, 70pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J.E. 1995. Transportation Innovation and Social Complexity Among Maritime Hunter-Gatherer Communities. American Anthropologist. 97(4): 733–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaujard, P. 2005. The Indian Ocean in Eurasia and African World-Systems before the Sixteenth Century. Journal of World History 16(4): 411–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood, P. 2007. Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, M.Q., et al. 2007. Spread of the Tiger: Global Risk of Invasion by the Mosquito Aedes Albopictus. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 7(1): 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthouly, C., et al. 2009. Genetic Analysis of Local Vietnamese Chickens Provides Evidence of Gene Flow from Wild to Domestic Populations. BMC Genetics. 10: 1. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-10-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan, M.S.A., et al. 2013. Genetic Diversity and Maternal Origin of Bangladesh Chicken. Molecular Biology Reproduction 40(6): 4123–4128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, Roger. 2008. The Austronesians in Madagascar and Their Interaction with the Bantu of the East African Coast: Surveying the Linguistic Evidence for Domestic and Translocated Animals. Studies in Philippine Languages and Cultures 18: 18–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, Roger. 2010. Evidence for the Austronesian Voyages in the Indian Ocean. In The Global Origins and Development of Seafaring, ed. A. Anderson, et al., 239–248. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Arcaeological Research, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, N., and D.Q. Fuller. 2009. Shell Middens, Ships and Seeds: Exploring Coastal Subsistence, Maritime Trade and the Dispersal of Domesticates in and Around the Ancient Arabian Peninsula. Journal of World Prehistory 22(2): 113–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, N., R. Blench, and D.Q. Fuller. 2009. Archaeological, Linguistic and Historical Sources on Ancient Seafaring: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Early Maritime Contact and Exchange in the Arabian Peninsula. In The Evolution of Human Populations in Arabia. Paleoenvironments, Prehistory and Genetics, ed. D. Petraglia and J.I. Rose, 251–278. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, N., et al. 2013. East Africa and Madagascar in the Indian Ocean World. Journal of World Prehistory 26(3): 213–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruford, M.W., D.G. Bradley, and G. Luikart. 2003. DNA Markers Reveal the Complexity of Livestock Domestication. Nature Reviews Genetics 4(11): 900–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappers, R. 2006. Roman Foodprints at Berenike: Archaeobotanical Evidence of Subsistence and Trade in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. Los Angeles, CA: Costen Institute of Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, L. 1980. Rome’s Trade with the East: The Sea Voyage to Africa and India. Transactions of the American Philological Association 110: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. The Periplus Maris Erythraei: Text with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press [Reprint 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Chami, F. 1999a. Graeco-Roman Trade Link and the Bantu Migration Theory. Anthropos 94(1–3): 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. 2009. Animal Genetic Resources. Beijing: Science Press of China [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, K.N. 1985. Trade and Civilisation in the Indian Ocean. An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessa, B., et al. 2009. Revealing the History of Sheep Domestication Using Retrovirus Integrations. Science 324(5926): 532–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, B-S. 1984. Animal Domestication in Neolithic China. In Animals and Archaeology: 3. Early Herders and Their Flocks, ed. J. Clutton-Brock and J. Grigson, 363–369. British Oxford: B.A.R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D.A. 1991. Replication and Transcription of Vertebrate Mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Cell Biology 7: 453–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collias, N.E., and E.C. Collias. 1996. Social Organization of a Red Junglefowl, Gallus gallus, Population Related to Evolution Theory. Animal Behaviour 51(6): 1337–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daikwo, I.S., A.A. Okpe, and J.O. Ocheja. 2011. Phenotypic Characterization of Local Chickens in Dekina. International Journal of Poultry Science 10(6): 444–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, N., et al. 2010. East Asian Contributions to Dutch Traditional and Western Commercial Chickens Inferred from mtDNA Analysis. Animal Genetics 42(2): 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delacour, J. 1957. The Pheasants of the World. Surrey/Hindhead: Spue Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H., et al. 2014. The Re-examination of the Domestic Chicken in Ancient China. Chinese Archaeology 14(1): 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueppen, S.A. 2011. Early Evidence for Chicken at Iron Age Kirikongo (c AD 100–1450), Burkina Faso. Antiquity 85(327): 142–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duyvendak, J.J.L. 1939. The True Dates of the Chinese Maritime Expeditions in the Early Fifteenth Century. T’oung Pao 34(5): 341–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C.J., et al. 2007. Mitochondrial DNA Analysis Shows a Near Eastern Neolithic Origin for Domestic Cattle and No Indication of Domestication of European Aurochs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274(1616): 1377–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkhaiat, I., et al. 2014. Genetic Diversity of Egyptian Native Chickens Using mtDNA D-loop Region. Journal of Poultry Science 51(4). doi:10.2141/jpsa0130232.

  • El-Safty, S.A. 2012. Determination of Some Quantitative and Qualitative Traits in Libyan Native Fowls. Egypt Poultry Science 32(2): 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, J., et al. 2008. Identification of the Yellow Skin Gene Reveals a Hybrid Origin of the Domestic Chicken. PLoS Genetics 4(2): e1000010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, H., et al. 2006. Divergent mtDNA Lineages of Goats in an Early Neolithic Site, Far from the Initial Domestication Areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(42): 15375–15379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, D.Q. 2006. Agricultural Origins and Frontiers in South Asia: A Working Synthesis. Journal of World Prehistory 20(1): 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, D.Q., and N.L. Boivin. 2009. Crops, Cattle and Commensals across the Indian Ocean: Current and Potential Archaeobiological Evidence. Études Océan Indien 42–43: 13–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, D.Q., et al. 2011. Across the Indian Ocean: The Prehistoric Movement of Plants and Animals. Antiquity 85(328): 544–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumihito, A., et al. 1994. One Subspecies of the Red junglefowl (Gallus gallus gallus) Suffices as the Matriarchic Ancestor of all Domestic Breeds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91(26): 12505–12509.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Monophyletic Origin and Unique Dispersal Patterns of Domestic Fowls. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93(13): 6792–6795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, I.C., and P.S. Bellwood. 2004. Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to History. New York: Routledge Curzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanotte, O., et al. 2002. African Pastoralism: Genetic Imprints of Origins and Migrations. Science 296(5566): 336–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, C. 1989. The Archaeology of Mainland Southeast Asia: From 10000 B.C. to the Fall of Angkor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S.Y.W., and M.T.P. Gilbert. 2010. Ancient Mitogenomics. Mitochondrion 10(1): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, M., and N. Mudida. 1996. Subsistence at Shanga: The faunal record. In Zanzibar and Pemba: Archaeological Investigations of an Indian Ocean Archipelago, ed. M. Horton. London: British Institute in Eastern Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, P.F., and S.M. Goodman. 1986. The Birds of Ancient Egypt. Warminster: Aris and Phillips Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard, P.A. 1999. The Pheasants of the World: Biology and Natural History. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juma, A.M. 2004. Unguja Ukuu on Zanzibar: An Archaeological Study of Early Urbanism. Uppsala: Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanginakudru, S. et al. 2008. Genetic Evidence From Indian Red Jungle Fowl Corroborates Multiple Domestication of Modern Day Chicken. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8:174. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-174..

  • Kelly, L. 2006. The Little Chicken Book. Caledon, Ontario: Blue Barn Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G., et al. 2010. Patterns of East Asian Pig Domestication, Migration, and Turnover Revealed by Modern and Ancient DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(17): 7686–7691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y.P., et al. 2006. Multiple Maternal Origins of Chickens: Out of the Asian Jungles. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38(1): 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liukart, G., et al. 2001. Multiple Maternal Origins and Weak Phylogeographic Structure in Domestic Goats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98(10): 5927–5932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyimo, C.M., et al. 2013. Assessing the Genetic Diversity of Five Tanzanian Chicken Ecotypes Using Molecular tools. South African Journal of Animal Science 43(4): 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, K.C. 1992. The Domestic Chicken (Gallus gallus) in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Background to its Introduction and its Osteological Differentiation from Indigenous Fowls (Numidinae and Francolinus sp). Journal of Archaeological Science 19(3): 303–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995a. Why Chicken? The Centrality of the Domestic Fowl in West African Ritual and Magic. In The Symbolic Role of Animals in Archaeology, ed. K. Ryan and P.J. Crabtree. Philadelphia: MASCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995b. The Faunal Remains (Mammals, Birds and Reptiles). In Excavations at Jenne-Jeno, Hambarketolo and Kaniana (Inland Niger Delta, Mali), ed. S.K. McIntosh, 291–318. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, K.C., and D.N. Edwards. 1993. Chicken in Africa: The Importance of Qasr Ibrim. Antiquity 67(256): 584–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matisoo-Smith, E., and J.H. Robins. 2004. Origins and Dispersals of Pacific Peoples: Evidence from mtDNA Phylogenies of the Pacific Rat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 9167–9172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melesse, A., and T. Negesse. 2011. Phenotypic and Morphological Characterization of Indigenous Chicken Populations in Southern Region of Ethiopia. Animal Genetic Resources 49: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miao, Y.-W., et al. 2013. Chicken Domestication: An Updated Perspective Based on Mitochondrial Genomes. Heredity 110(3): 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mtileni, B.J., et al. 2011. Diversity and Origins of South African Chickens. Poultry Science 90: 2189–2194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchadeyi, F.C., et al. 2008. Mitochondrial DNA D-loop Sequences Suggest a Southeast Asian and Indian Origin of Zimbabwean Village Chicken. Animal Genetics 39(6): 615–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwacharo, J.M., et al. 2011. Mitochondrial DNA Reveals Multiple Introductions of Domestic Chicken in East Africa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58(2): 374–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The History of African Village Chickens: An Archaeological and Molecular Perspective. African Archeological Review 30(1): 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishibori, M., et al. 2005. Molecular Evidence for Hybridization of Species in the Genus Gallus Except for Gallus Varius. Animal Genetics 36(5): 367–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu, D., et al. 2002. The Origin and Genetic Diversity of Chinese Indigenous Chicken Breeds. Biochemical Genetics 40(5–6): 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar, H., et al. 2011. Phylogenetic Relationships of Malayan and Malagasy Pygmy Shrews of the Genus Suncus (Soricomorpha: Soricidae) Inferred from Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Gene Sequences. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 59(2): 237–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakendorf, B., and M. Stoneking. 2005. Mitochondrial DNA and Human Evolution. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 6: 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, M. 2011. Islamic Trade, Shipping, Port-States and Merchant Communities in the Indian Ocean, Seventh to Sixteenth Centuries. In The New Cambridge History of Islam, Volume 3: The Eastern Islamic World Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries, ed. D.O. Morgan and A. Reid, 317–365. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. 1998. Römische Tierhaltung und Tierzucht. Eine Synthese aus archäozoologischer Untersuchung und schriftlich-bildlicher Ãœberlieferung. Rahden: Verlag Marie Leidorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razafindraibe, H., et al. 2008. Mitochondrial DNA origin of Indigenous Malagasy Chicken: Implications for a Functional Polymorphisim at the Mx Gene. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1149: 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razafindrazaka, H., et al. 2010. Complete Mitochondrial DNA Sequences Provide New Insights into the Polynesian Motif and the Peopling of Madagascar. European Journal of Human Genetics 18(5): 575–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, S. 1984–1985. The Common Fowl in Early China. Journal of the Hong Kong Archaeological Society 11: 124–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., F. Silva, and J. Steele. 2014. Modelling the Spread of Farming in the Bantu-Speaking Regions of Africa: An Archaeology-Based Phylogeography. PLoS ONE 9: e87854. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, P., et al. 2008. Mitochondrial DNA Based Analysis of Genetic Variation and Relatedness among Sri Lankan Indigenous Chickens and the Ceylon Junglefowl (Gallus lafayetti). Animal Genetics. 40(1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simoons, F.J. 1994. Eat Not this Flesh: Food Avoidances from Prehistory to the Present. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, A.A., et al. 2012. Investigating the Global Dispersal of Chickens in Prehistory Using Ancient Mitochondrial DNA Signatures. PLoS ONE 7(7): e39171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulandari, S., M.A. Zein, and T. Sartika. 2008. Molecular Characterization of Indonesian Indigenous Chickens Based on Mitochondrial DNA Displacement (D)-loop Sequences. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences 15(4): 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazeille, M., et al. 2001. Population Genetic Structure and Competence as a Vector for Dengue Type 2 Virus of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Madagascar. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 65(5): 491–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M.T. 2007. Island Subsistence: Hunting, Trapping and the Translocation of Wildlife in the Western Indian Ocean. Azania 42(1): 83–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wani, C.E., et al. 2014. Molecular Characterization of Sudanese and Southern Sudanese Chicken Breeds Using mtDNA D-loop. Genetics Research International. doi:10.1155/2014/928420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, K. 2000. Did Chicken Go West? In The Origins and Development of African Livestock: Archaeology, Genetics, Linguistics and Ethnography, ed. R.M. Blench and K.C. MacDonald. London: UCL Press, Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T.H., and A.L. Omar. 1997. Archaeological Investigations at Pate. Azania 32(1): 31–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zein, M.S.A., and S. Sulandari. 2012. Genetic Diversity and Haplogroups Distributions of Kampung Chickens Using Hypervariable-I Mitochondrial DNA Control Region. Indonesian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 17(2): 120–131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mwacharo, J. (2016). Intercontinental Networks Between Africa and Asia Across the Indian Ocean: What Do Village Chickens Reveal?. In: Campbell, G. (eds) Early Exchange between Africa and the Wider Indian Ocean World . Palgrave Series in Indian Ocean World Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33822-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33822-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33821-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33822-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics