Skip to main content
  • 480 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we present a pilot study of the Print Awareness Tool (PAT). We initially designed PAT as an eco-feedback tool for paper waste reduction, but in our pilot study, it proved additionally even more valuable as an organizational probe providing the opportunity to question organizational paper-based workflows in general. Our findings illustrate that this is particularly true for administrative work where individuals have little agency, i.e. control over the printing tasks and processes they are involved in. We saw, however, that to capitalize on this effect, and to gather and benefit from the knowledge coming to the surface, the tool has to be enriched and managed accordingly. In addition, our study also showed evidence of paper affordances for administrative work that go beyond those discussed in the literature so far. From our findings we finally derive design requirements to digitally support such affordances and to extend PAT from a paper waste reduction tool into an infrastructure that would support organizations with a paper to digital transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aipperspach R, Rattenbuy TL, Woodruff A, Anderson K, Canny JF, Aoki P (2006) Ethno-mining: integrating numbers and words from the ground up. Technical Report, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson RJ, Sharrock WW (1993) Can organisations afford knowledge? J Comput Supported Coop Work (JCSCW) 1(3):143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson K, Nafus D, Rattenbury T, Aipperspach R (2009) Numbers have qualities too: experiences with ethno-mining. Ethnographic Prax Ind Conf Proc 2009:123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Argote L (2013) Organizational learning: creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Boehner K, Vertesi J, Sengers P, Dourish P (2007) How HCI interprets the probes. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (San Jose, CA, USA, Apr-28–May-03, 2007). CHI’07, ACM, New York. pp 1077–1086

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brynjarsdottir H, Håkansson M, Pierce J, Baumer E, DiSalvo C, Sengers P (2012) Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’12). ACM, New York, pp 947–956

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dourish P, Bellotti V (1992) Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW’92). ACM, New York, pp 107–114

    Google Scholar 

  8. Froehlich J, Findlater L, Landay J (2010) The design of eco-feedback technology. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’10). ACM, New York, pp 1999–2008

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ipsos Study for Lexmark, http://www.infohightech.com/CPpdf/lexmark3.pdf. Accessed July 2015

  10. Pousman Z, Rouzati H, Stasko J (n.d.) Imprint, a community visualization of printer data: designing for open-ended engagement on sustainability. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW’08). ACM, New York, pp 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sellen AJ, Harper RHR (2003) The myth of the paperless office. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Strengers YAA (2011) Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, pp 2135–2144

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tyson PJ (1992) The desk as a social institution, EuroPARC technical report EPC-92-130, Rank Xerox EuroPARC, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  14. Willamowski JK, Hoppenot Y, Grasso A (2013) Promoting sustainable print behavior. In: CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (CHI EA’13). ACM, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao J, Fan J (2009) PrintMarmoset: redesigning the print button for sustainability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, pp 109–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jutta Willamowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mazzega, M., Willamowski, J., Hoppenot, Y., Grasso, A. (2016). From Eco-feedback to an Organizational Probe, Highlighting Paper Affordances in Administrative Work. In: De Angeli, A., Bannon, L., Marti, P., Bordin, S. (eds) COOP 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 23-27 May 2016, Trento, Italy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33463-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33464-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics