Skip to main content

In Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection, Do Current Operative Therapies Reduce Complications Compared to Medical Management?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Difficult Decisions in Vascular Surgery

Part of the book series: Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach ((DDSURGERY))

  • 1044 Accesses

Abstract

The management of acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) has largely been dictated by whether or not the case is “complicated,” meaning symptomatic or extensive such that no intervention would lead to death. Historically, complicated acute TBAD has been managed with operative intervention and uncomplicated acute TBAD has been managed with medical treatment. Acute complicated TBAD left untreated has mortality rates as high as 50 % in the first month. While uncomplicated acute TBAD has good outcomes with medical management in the short-term, long-term outcomes are discouraging with mortality rates approaching 30–50 % at 5 years, largely due to aneurysmal degeneration of the false lumen. Both open and endovascular treatment strategies have a role in both complicated and uncomplicated acute TBAD and the role of endovascular intervention is ever-expanding as research shows favorable short-term outcomes and long-term aortic remodeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 229.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Howard DPJ, Banerjee A, Fairhead JF, Perkins J, Silver LE, Rothwell PM. Population-based study of incidence and outcome of acute aortic dissection and premorbid risk factor control. Circulation. 2013;127:2031–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zahn R, Erbel R, Nienaber C, Neumann F, Nef H, Eggebrecht H, et al. Endovascular aortic repair of thoracic aortic disease: early and 1-year results from a German multicenter registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20:265–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parker J, Golledge J. Outcome of endovascular treatment of acute type B aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1707–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Golledge J, Eagle K. Acute aortic dissection. Lancet. 2008;372:55–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsai T, Trimarchi S, Nienaber C. Acute aortic dissection: perspectives from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:149–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilkinson D, Patel H, Williams D, Dasika N, Deeb G. Early open and endovascular thoracic aortic repair for complicated type B aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:23–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrlich M, Rousseau H, Heijmen R, Piquet P, Beregi J, Nienaber C, et al. Midterm results after endovascular treatment of acute, complicated type B aortic dissection: the talent thoracic registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:159–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lombardi J, Cambria R, Nienaber C, Chiesa R, Mossop P, Haulon S, et al. Aortic remodeling after endovascular treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection with the use of a composite device design. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:1544–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nienaber C, Kische S, Rousseau H, Eggebrecht H, Rehders T, Kundt G, et al. Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: long-term results of the randomized investigation of stent grafts in aortic dissection trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:407–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin Y, Deng G, Li T, Wang W, Teng G. Treatment of acute type-B aortic dissection: thoracic endovascular aortic repair or medical management alone? J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6:185–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erbel R, Alfonso F, Boileau C, Dirsch O, Eber B, Haverich A, et al. Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection: recommendations of the Task Force on Aortic Dissection, European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1642–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fattori R, Tsai T, Myrmel T, Evangelista A, Cooper J, Trimarchi S, et al. Complicated acute type B dissection: is surgery still the best option? J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2008;1:395–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fattori R, Montgomery D, Lovato L, Kische S, Di Eusanio M, Ince H, et al. Survival after endovascular therapy in patients with type B aortic dissection: a report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;6:876–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nienaber C, Rousseau H, Eggebrecht H, Kische S, Fattori R, Rehders T, et al. Randomized comparison of strategies for type B aortic dissection: the investigation of stent grafts in aortic dissection (INSTEAD) trial. Circulation. 2009;120:2519–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brunkwall J, Kasprzak P, Verhoeben E, Heijmen R, Taylor P, the ADSORB trialists, et al. Endovascular repair of acute uncomplicated aortic type B dissection promotes aortic remodeling: 1 year results of the ADSORB trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:285–91.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ulug P, McCaslin J, Stansby G, Powell J. Endovascular versus conventional medical treatment for uncomplicated chronic type B aortic dissection (review). Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2012;(11):1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Di Bartolomeo R, Eggebrecht H, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(41):2873–926.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fattori R, Cao P, De Rango P, Czerny M, Evangelista A, Nienaber C, et al. Interdisciplinary expert consensus document of management of type B aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1661–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Lombardi MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Awad, N., Lombardi, J. (2017). In Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection, Do Current Operative Therapies Reduce Complications Compared to Medical Management?. In: Skelly, C., Milner, R. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Vascular Surgery. Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33293-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33293-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33291-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33293-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics