Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics and Patents in Stem Cell Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Stem Cells

Part of the book series: Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine ((STEMCELL))

  • 925 Accesses

Abstract

During the last decade, stem cell-based therapies have become reality. This chapter aims to provide a history of stem cell research and ethical dilemmas that have been contested over the years. We examine U.S. policies towards stem cell—primarily embryonic stem cell research—in detail. In addition, we present the global landscape on patent eligibility of stem cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Skloot R. The immortal life of Henrietta lacks. New York: Crown; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Callaway E. HeLa publication brews bioethical storm. Nature. 2013. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.12689.

  3. Callaway E. Most popular human cell in science gets sequenced. Nature. 2013. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.12609.

  4. Wang K, Zeng J, Luo L, Yang J, Chen J, Li B, Shen K. Identification of a cancer stem cell-like side population in the HeLa human cervical carcinoma cell line. Oncol Lett. 2013;6(6):1673–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. National Institutes of Health. NIH, Lacks family reach understanding to share genomic data of HeLa cells. ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 7 August 2013. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130807134010.htm>

  6. Dorney M. Moore v. the Regents of the University of California: balancing the need for biotechnology innovation against the right of informed consent. Berekley Technol Law J. 1990. doi:10.15779/Z385957.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davey S, Davey N, Gu Q, Xu N, Vatsa R, Devalraja S, Harris P, Gannavaram S, Dave R, Chakrabarty A. Interfacing of science, medicine and law: the stem cell patent controversy in the United States and the European Union. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2015;3:71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78(12):7634–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomson J, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro S, Waknitz M, Swiergiel J, Marshall V, Jones J. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282(5391):1145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gearhart J. New human embryonic stem-cell lines—more is better. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(13):1275–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kimbrel EA, Lanza R. Current status of pluripotent stem cells: moving the first therapies to the clinic. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14(10):681–92. doi:10.1038/nrd4738. http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v14/n10/fig_tab/nrd4738_T1.html.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663–76. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cyranoksi D. Japanese women is first recipient of next-generation stem cells. Nature News. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Siegel A. Ethics of stem cell research. In: Zalta EN, editor. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Spring 2013 Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wertz DC. Embryo and stem cell research in the United States: history and politics. Gene Ther. 2002;9(11):674–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunn K. The politics of stem cells. NOVA ScienceNOW. 2005. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/stem-cells-politics.html.

  17. Wert G, Mummery C. Human embryonic stem cells: research, ethics and policy. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(4):672–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Evans M, Kaufman M. Establishment in culture of pluripotent cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981;292(5819):154–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bergman K, Graff GD. The global stem cell patent landscape: implications for efficient technology transfer and commercial development. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:419–24. doi:10.1038/nbt0407-419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 185. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), Pub. L. 112-29, sec. 33(a), 125 Stat. 284.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 157 Cong. Rec. E1177-04 Testimony of Representative Dave Weldon previously presented in connection with the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, Pub. L. 108-199, '634, 118 Stat. 3, 101, and later resubmitted with regard to the AIA; see 149 Cong. Rec. E2417-01.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 133 S.Ct. 2107, 2116-17. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, No. 2013-1377 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Directive 98/44/EC, Article 6(2)(c).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brüstle v. Greenpeace eV (C-34/10) [2012] 1 C.M.L.R. 41 (the “Brüstle decision”).

    Google Scholar 

  28. International Stem Cell Corporation versus Comptroller General of Patents, CJEU, 18 December 2014, Case C-364/13.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Australia: PATENTS ACT 1990 No. 83, 1990 - Section 18 (Principal Act).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Union College, Schenectady, NY, USA

    Elina Davé

  2. George Washington University School of Law, Washington, DC, USA

    Na Xu

  3. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Neil Davey

  4. Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Sonya Davey

Authors
  1. Elina Davé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Na Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Neil Davey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sonya Davey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonya Davey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Qatar Biomedical Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar

    Essam M. Abdelalim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davé, E., Xu, N., Davey, N., Davey, S. (2016). Ethics and Patents in Stem Cell Research. In: Abdelalim, E. (eds) Recent Advances in Stem Cells. Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33270-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation