Skip to main content

Living with Penile Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Penile Cancer

Abstract

Men with penile cancer usually undergo surgical treatment that may be mutilating with part or all of the penis being removed. The functional and psychological consequences of such surgery are superimposed upon those feelings that are experienced by all men and women, who suffer from cancer. Chief amongst these are changes in voiding and sexual function together with significant issues relating to masculinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leijte JAP, Kirrander P, Antonini N, Windahl T, Horenblas S. Recurrence patterns of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: recommendations for follow-up based on a two-centre analysis of 700 patients. Eur Urol. 2008;54:161–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Skeppner E, Windahl T, Andersson SO, Fugl-Meyer K. Treatment-seeking aspects of sexual activity and life satisfaction in men with laser-treated penile carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2008;54:631–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Misra S, Chaturvurdi A, Misra NC. Penile carcinoma: a challenge for the developing world. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5:240–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Witty K, Branney P, Evans J, White A, Eardley I. The impact of surgical treatment for penile cancer – patients’ perspectives. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17:661–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bullen K, Matthews S, Edwards S, Marke V. Exploring men’s experiences of penile cancer surgery to improve rehabilitation. Nurs Times. 2009;102:12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Branney P, Witty K, Eardley I. Psychology, men and cancer. Psychologist. 2014;27:2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Branney P, Witty K, Braybrook D, et al. Maculinities, humour and care for penile cancer: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70:2051–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Opjordsmoen S, Waehre H, Aass N, Fossa SD. Sexuality in patients treated for penile cancer: patients experience and doctor’s judgement. Br J Urol. 1994;73:554–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Romero FR, Romero KRP, Mattos MAE, et al. Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology. 2005;66:1292–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for the assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:822–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith Y, Hadway P, Biedrzycki O, et al. Reconstructive surgery for invasive squamous carcinoma of the glans penis. Euro Urol. 2007;52:1179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Minhas S, Kayes O, Hegarty P, et al. What surgical resection margins are required to achieve oncological control in men with primary penile cancer. BJU Int. 2005;96:1040–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Philippou P, Shabbir M, Malone P, et al. Conservative surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: resection margins and long term oncological control. J Urol. 2012;188:803–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gulino G, Sasso F, Falabella R, Bassi PF. Distal urethral reconstruction of the glans for penile carcinoma: results of a novel technique at 1-year follow-up. J Urol. 2007;178(3 Pt 1):941–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiefer JM, Djajadiningrat RS, von Muilekom EA, et al. Quality of life for patients treated for penile cancer. J Urol. 2014;192:1105–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maddineni SB, Lau MM, Sangar VK. Identifying the needs of penile cancer sufferers: a systematic review of the quality of life, psychosexual and psychosocial literature in penile cancer. BMC Urol. 2009;9:8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ficarra V, Righetti R, D’Amico A, et al. General state of health and psychological well being in patients after surgery for urological malignancy. Urol Int. 2000;65:130–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Ancona CA, Botega NJ, De Moraes C, et al. Quality of life after partial penectomy for penile carcinoma. Urology. 1997;50:593–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Eardley MA, MChir, FRCS, FEBU, FECSM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eardley, I. (2016). Living with Penile Cancer. In: Muneer, A., Horenblas, S. (eds) Textbook of Penile Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33220-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33220-8_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33218-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33220-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics