Skip to main content

Shifting the Black Box: Approaches to the Development and Evolution of the Vertebrate Mesoderm

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Developmental Biology

Abstract

The genotype was an abstraction at the time of the Modern Synthesis, though its direct causation of the phenotype was comfortably assumed. The cellular and developmental processes that actually build the phenotype were relegated to a black box and largely considered irrelevant to evolutionary biology. Techniques for manipulating DNA and sequencing of whole genomes have now given the genotype physical presence, and dramatic correlations of genetic and phenotypic perturbation reinforce the earlier assumptions. The last four decades have brought development back into the mainstream of evolutionary biology with the formalization of evo-devo. However, the genocentric perspective persists. A majority of evo-devo studies focus on evolution of developmental genes, and we still lack adequate knowledge of the rich phenomena between genotype and phenotype. Here I present data and perspectives from the vertebrate mesoderm and its musculoskeletal derivatives. The conserved embryonic cell populations of somitic and lateral plate mesoderm interact to generate the enormous range of diversity within the phylum, and understanding changes in these interactions can explain and predict both innovation and constraint. A wealth of work has mapped the expression and interactions of genes at play in the mesoderm, but while the musculoskeletal system varies widely, the genetic picture is highly conserved. Here I focus on the embryological, cellular context in which the genes take their actions, and argue that this context is the source of morphological variation leading to evolution. Correlations between genetic perturbations and morphological outcomes are valuable data but rarely address what actually goes on during morphogenesis. Cell behaviors like shape change, proliferation, growth, migration, and adhesion are activities that build structure in the embryo. These essential phenomena are often still stuck under the black box, which must be lifted to understand the dynamics that are the source of variation for evolutionary change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adhyapok P, Piatkowska AM, Clendenon SG, Stern CD, Glazier JA, Belmonte JM (2019) A Mechanical Model of Early Somite Segmentation. bio Rxiv 804203

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholtz EA, Stepien CC (2009) Anatomical transformation in mammals: developmental origin of aberrant cervical anatomy in tree sloths. Evol Dev 11(1):69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke AC (1989) Development of the turtle carapace: implications for the evolution of a novel bauplan. J Morphol 199(3):363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke AC, Nowicki JL (2003) A new view of patterning domains in the vertebrate mesoderm. Dev Cell 4(2):159–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burke AC, Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Tabin C (1995) Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Dev 121(2):333–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Charest F, Johanson Z, Cloutier R (2018) Loss in the making: absence of pelvic fins and presence of paedomorphic pelvic girdles in a Late Devonian antiarch placoderm (jawed stem-gnathostome). Biol Lett 14(6):20180199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke J, Zeeman EC (1976) A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis. J Theor Biol 58(2):455–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Durland JL, Sferlazzo M, Logan M, Burke AC (2008) Visualizing the lateral somitic frontier in the Prx1Cre transgenic mouse. J Anat 212(5):590–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas R, Zhang G, Cohn MJ (2006) Evidence that mechanisms of fin development evolved in the midline of early vertebrates. Nature 442(7106):1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • French V, Ingham P, Cooke J, Smith J (1988) Mechanisms of segmentation. Dev sup 104:1–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis JA, Dahn RD, Shubin NH (2009) Shared developmental mechanisms pattern the vertebrate gill arch and paired fin skeletons. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(14):5720–5724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gofflot F, Jeannotte L, Rezsohazy R, Krumlauf R, Gaunt SJ, Gentile C, Kmita M, Casaca A, Hauswirth GM, Bildsoe H, Mallo M (2018) Hox genes: past, present and future of master regulator genes. Int J Dev Biol 62:653–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Head JJ, Polly PD (2015) Evolution of the snake body form reveals homoplasy in amniote Hox gene function. Nature 520(7545):86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson Z (2010) Evolution of paired fins and the lateral somitic frontier. J Exp Zool B 314:347–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusakabe R, Kuraku S, Kuratani S (2011) Expression and interaction of muscle-related genes in the lamprey imply the evolutionary scenario for vertebrate skeletal muscle, in association with the acquisition of the neck and fins. Dev Biol 350(1):217–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Douarin N (1984) Chimeras in developmental biology. Academic Press San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan M, Martin JF, Nagy A, Lobe C, Olson EN, Tabin CJ (2002) Expression of Cre recombinase in the developing mouse limb bud driven by a Prxl enhancer. Genesis 33(2):77–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt H (1983) Cell determination boundaries as organizing regions for secondary embryonic fields. Dev Biol 96(2):375–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau C, Caldarelli P, Rocancourt D, Roussel J, Denans N, Pourquie O, Gros J (2019) Timed collinear activation of Hox genes during gastrulation controls the avian forelimb position. Curr Biol 29(1):35–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami G, Nakamura H (1991) Somites and the pattern formation of trunk muscles: a study in quail-chick chimera. Arch Histol Cytol 54(3):249–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy MM, Lawson JA, Mathew SJ, Hutcheson DA, Kardon G (2011) Satellite cells, connective tissue fibroblasts and their interactions are crucial for muscle regeneration. Development 138(17):3625–3637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy L (1998) Changing patterns of gene regulation in the evolution of arthropod morphology. Am Zool 38(6):818–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noden DM, Trainor PA (2005) Relations and interactions between cranial mesoderm and neural crest populations. J Anat 207(5):575–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki JL, Burke AC (2000) Hox genes and morphological identity: axial versus lateral patterning in the vertebrate mesoderm. Dev 127(19):4265–4275

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki JL, Takimoto R, Burke AC (2003) The lateral somitic frontier: dorso-ventral aspects of anterior-posterior regionalization in avian embryos. Mech Dev 120(2):227–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto E, Moriyama Y, Kuraku S, Kai KI, Tanaka M (2019) Involvement of HGF/MET signaling in appendicular muscle development in cartilaginous fish. Develop Growth Differ 61(1):97–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ordahl CP (ed) (2000) Somitogenesis, vol 1 & 2. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearman RM, Burke AC (2009) The lateral somitic frontier in ontogeny and phylogeny. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 312(6):603–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tani-Matsuhana S, Kusakabe R, Inoue K (2018) Developmental mechanisms of migratory muscle precursors in medaka pectoral fin formation. Dev Genes Evol 228(5):189–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tulenko FJ, McCauley DW, MacKenzie EL, Mazan S, Kuratani S, Sugahara F, Kusakabe R, Burke AC (2013) Body wall development in lamprey and a new perspective on the origin of vertebrate paired fins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(29):11899–11904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert L (2016) Positional information and pattern formation. Curr Top Dev Biol 117:597–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wotton KR, Schubert FR, Dietrich S (2015) Hypaxial muscle: controversial classification and controversial data? In: Brand-Saberi B (ed) Vertebrate myogenesis. Results and problems in cell differentiation, vol 56. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • York JR, Lee EMJ, McCauley DW (2019) The lamprey as a model vertebrate in evolutionary developmental biology. In: lampreys: biology, conservation and control. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 481–526

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann C. Burke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Burke, A.C. (2021). Shifting the Black Box: Approaches to the Development and Evolution of the Vertebrate Mesoderm. In: Nuño de la Rosa, L., Müller, G.B. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32979-6_188

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics