Abstract
The genotype was an abstraction at the time of the Modern Synthesis, though its direct causation of the phenotype was comfortably assumed. The cellular and developmental processes that actually build the phenotype were relegated to a black box and largely considered irrelevant to evolutionary biology. Techniques for manipulating DNA and sequencing of whole genomes have now given the genotype physical presence, and dramatic correlations of genetic and phenotypic perturbation reinforce the earlier assumptions. The last four decades have brought development back into the mainstream of evolutionary biology with the formalization of evo-devo. However, the genocentric perspective persists. A majority of evo-devo studies focus on evolution of developmental genes, and we still lack adequate knowledge of the rich phenomena between genotype and phenotype. Here I present data and perspectives from the vertebrate mesoderm and its musculoskeletal derivatives. The conserved embryonic cell populations of somitic and lateral plate mesoderm interact to generate the enormous range of diversity within the phylum, and understanding changes in these interactions can explain and predict both innovation and constraint. A wealth of work has mapped the expression and interactions of genes at play in the mesoderm, but while the musculoskeletal system varies widely, the genetic picture is highly conserved. Here I focus on the embryological, cellular context in which the genes take their actions, and argue that this context is the source of morphological variation leading to evolution. Correlations between genetic perturbations and morphological outcomes are valuable data but rarely address what actually goes on during morphogenesis. Cell behaviors like shape change, proliferation, growth, migration, and adhesion are activities that build structure in the embryo. These essential phenomena are often still stuck under the black box, which must be lifted to understand the dynamics that are the source of variation for evolutionary change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adhyapok P, Piatkowska AM, Clendenon SG, Stern CD, Glazier JA, Belmonte JM (2019) A Mechanical Model of Early Somite Segmentation. bio Rxiv 804203
Buchholtz EA, Stepien CC (2009) Anatomical transformation in mammals: developmental origin of aberrant cervical anatomy in tree sloths. Evol Dev 11(1):69–79
Burke AC (1989) Development of the turtle carapace: implications for the evolution of a novel bauplan. J Morphol 199(3):363–378
Burke AC, Nowicki JL (2003) A new view of patterning domains in the vertebrate mesoderm. Dev Cell 4(2):159–165
Burke AC, Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Tabin C (1995) Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Dev 121(2):333–346
Charest F, Johanson Z, Cloutier R (2018) Loss in the making: absence of pelvic fins and presence of paedomorphic pelvic girdles in a Late Devonian antiarch placoderm (jawed stem-gnathostome). Biol Lett 14(6):20180199
Cooke J, Zeeman EC (1976) A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis. J Theor Biol 58(2):455–76
Durland JL, Sferlazzo M, Logan M, Burke AC (2008) Visualizing the lateral somitic frontier in the Prx1Cre transgenic mouse. J Anat 212(5):590–602
Freitas R, Zhang G, Cohn MJ (2006) Evidence that mechanisms of fin development evolved in the midline of early vertebrates. Nature 442(7106):1033
French V, Ingham P, Cooke J, Smith J (1988) Mechanisms of segmentation. Dev sup 104:1–249
Gillis JA, Dahn RD, Shubin NH (2009) Shared developmental mechanisms pattern the vertebrate gill arch and paired fin skeletons. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(14):5720–5724
Gofflot F, Jeannotte L, Rezsohazy R, Krumlauf R, Gaunt SJ, Gentile C, Kmita M, Casaca A, Hauswirth GM, Bildsoe H, Mallo M (2018) Hox genes: past, present and future of master regulator genes. Int J Dev Biol 62:653–876
Head JJ, Polly PD (2015) Evolution of the snake body form reveals homoplasy in amniote Hox gene function. Nature 520(7545):86
Johanson Z (2010) Evolution of paired fins and the lateral somitic frontier. J Exp Zool B 314:347–352
Kusakabe R, Kuraku S, Kuratani S (2011) Expression and interaction of muscle-related genes in the lamprey imply the evolutionary scenario for vertebrate skeletal muscle, in association with the acquisition of the neck and fins. Dev Biol 350(1):217–227
Le Douarin N (1984) Chimeras in developmental biology. Academic Press San Diego, CA
Logan M, Martin JF, Nagy A, Lobe C, Olson EN, Tabin CJ (2002) Expression of Cre recombinase in the developing mouse limb bud driven by a Prxl enhancer. Genesis 33(2):77–80
Meinhardt H (1983) Cell determination boundaries as organizing regions for secondary embryonic fields. Dev Biol 96(2):375–385
Moreau C, Caldarelli P, Rocancourt D, Roussel J, Denans N, Pourquie O, Gros J (2019) Timed collinear activation of Hox genes during gastrulation controls the avian forelimb position. Curr Biol 29(1):35–50
Murakami G, Nakamura H (1991) Somites and the pattern formation of trunk muscles: a study in quail-chick chimera. Arch Histol Cytol 54(3):249–258
Murphy MM, Lawson JA, Mathew SJ, Hutcheson DA, Kardon G (2011) Satellite cells, connective tissue fibroblasts and their interactions are crucial for muscle regeneration. Development 138(17):3625–3637
Nagy L (1998) Changing patterns of gene regulation in the evolution of arthropod morphology. Am Zool 38(6):818–828
Noden DM, Trainor PA (2005) Relations and interactions between cranial mesoderm and neural crest populations. J Anat 207(5):575–601
Nowicki JL, Burke AC (2000) Hox genes and morphological identity: axial versus lateral patterning in the vertebrate mesoderm. Dev 127(19):4265–4275
Nowicki JL, Takimoto R, Burke AC (2003) The lateral somitic frontier: dorso-ventral aspects of anterior-posterior regionalization in avian embryos. Mech Dev 120(2):227–240
Okamoto E, Moriyama Y, Kuraku S, Kai KI, Tanaka M (2019) Involvement of HGF/MET signaling in appendicular muscle development in cartilaginous fish. Develop Growth Differ 61(1):97–103
Ordahl CP (ed) (2000) Somitogenesis, vol 1 & 2. Academic Press, San Diego
Shearman RM, Burke AC (2009) The lateral somitic frontier in ontogeny and phylogeny. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 312(6):603–612
Tani-Matsuhana S, Kusakabe R, Inoue K (2018) Developmental mechanisms of migratory muscle precursors in medaka pectoral fin formation. Dev Genes Evol 228(5):189–196
Tulenko FJ, McCauley DW, MacKenzie EL, Mazan S, Kuratani S, Sugahara F, Kusakabe R, Burke AC (2013) Body wall development in lamprey and a new perspective on the origin of vertebrate paired fins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(29):11899–11904
Wolpert L (2016) Positional information and pattern formation. Curr Top Dev Biol 117:597–608
Wotton KR, Schubert FR, Dietrich S (2015) Hypaxial muscle: controversial classification and controversial data? In: Brand-Saberi B (ed) Vertebrate myogenesis. Results and problems in cell differentiation, vol 56. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
York JR, Lee EMJ, McCauley DW (2019) The lamprey as a model vertebrate in evolutionary developmental biology. In: lampreys: biology, conservation and control. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 481–526
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Burke, A.C. (2021). Shifting the Black Box: Approaches to the Development and Evolution of the Vertebrate Mesoderm. In: Nuño de la Rosa, L., Müller, G.B. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32979-6_188
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32979-6_188
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32977-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32979-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences