Skip to main content

Electric Field Distribution and Electroporation Threshold

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Electroporation

Abstract

This chapter is dedicated to fundamentals of interaction between cells and tissues exposed to the externally applied electric field. Through experimental work and mathematical modeling, it has been shown that an accurate coverage of tissue with sufficiently large electric field presents one of the most important conditions for successful outcome of electroporation-based applications. The electroporation process as well as cell viability is also governed by other parameters of applied electric pulses and characteristics of targeted tissue; thus, different electroporation threshold values of the electric field for reversible and irreversible electroporation are being reported. Electric pulses and tissue structure also define established electric field distribution which is difficult to predict. Still, numerical modeling has proven to be very efficient in providing simulated maps of electric field distributions for various electrode geometries and tissue structures, especially if they incorporate nonlinear behavior of tissue electrical properties. Electric field distribution in tissues can also be indirectly monitored using magnetic resonance techniques that enable determination of electric field distribution in situ while taking into account nonlinear changes that occur in the tissue due to electroporation. Brief introduction to the monitoring method together with maps of electric field distributions in animal and vegetable tissues obtained by means of magnetic resonance techniques is presented in the last part of the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Canatella PJ, Karr JF, Petros JA, Prausnitz MR (2001) Quantitative study of electroporation-mediated molecular uptake and cell viability. Biophys J 80(2):755–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čemažar M, Jarm T, Miklavčič D, Lebar AM, Ihan A, Kopitar NA, Serša G (1998) Effect of electric-field intensity on electropermeabilization and electrosensitivity of various tumor-cell lines in vitro. Electro- Magnetobiol 17(2):263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essone Mezeme M, Pucihar G, Pavlin M, Brosseau C, Miklavcic D (2012) A numerical analysis of multicellular environment for modeling tissue electroporation. Appl Phys Lett 100(14):143,701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faridnia F, Burritt DJ, Bremer PJ, Oey I (2015) Innovative approach to determine the effect of pulsed electric fields on the microstructure of whole potato tubers: use of cell viability, microscopic images and ionic leakage measurements. Food Res Int 77:556–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Fear EC, Stuchly MA (1998) Modeling assemblies of biological cells exposed to electric fields. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 45(10):1259–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galindo FG, Dejmek P, Lundgren K, Rasmusson AG, Vicente A, Moritz T (2009) Metabolomic evaluation of pulsed electric field-induced stress on potato tissue. Planta 230(3):469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse C, Schwan HP (1992) Cellular membrane potentials induced by alternating fields. Biophys J 63(6):1632–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivorra A, Mir LM, Rubinsky B (2009) Electric field redistribution due to conductivity changes during tissue electroporation: experiments with a simple vegetal model. IFMBE Proc 25:59–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang C, Davalos RV, Bischof JC (2015) A review of basic to clinical studies of irreversible electroporation therapy. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 62(1):4–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joy ML, Lebedev VP, Gati JS (1999) Imaging of current density and current pathways in rabbit brain during transcranial electrostimulation. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 46(9):1139–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranjc M, Markelc B, Bajd F, Čemažar M, Serša I, Blagus T, Miklavčič D (2015) In situ monitoring of electric field distribution in mouse tumor during electroporation. Radiology 274(1):115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranjc M, Bajd F, Serša I, de Boevere M, Miklavčič D (2016) Electric field distribution in relation to cell membrane electroporation in potato tuber tissue studied by magnetic resonance techniques. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol (in press). Doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.03.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy-Willig A, Bureau MF, Scherman D, Carlier PG (2005) In vivo NMR imaging evaluation of efficiency and toxicity of gene electrotransfer in rat muscle. Gene Ther 12:1434–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklavcic D, Semrov D, Mekid H, Mir LM (2000) A validated model of in vivo electric field distribution in tissues for electrochemotherapy and for DNA electrotransfer for gene therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1523(1):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muftuler LT, Hamamura MJ, Birgul O, Nalcioglu O (2006) In vivo MRI electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) of tumors. Technol Cancer Res Treat 5(4):381–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Nott KP, Shaarani SM, Hall LD (2003) The effect of microwave heating on potato texture studied with magnetic resonance imaging. In: Magnetic resonance in food science. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Pucihar G, Krmelj J, Rebersek M, Napotnik TB, Miklavcic D (2011) Equivalent pulse parameters for electroporation. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 58(11):3279–3288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin Z, Jiang J, Long G, Lindgren B, Bischof JC (2013) Irreversible electroporation: an in vivo study with dorsal skin fold chamber. Ann Biomed Eng 41(3):619–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sel D, Cukjati D, Batiuskaite D, Slivnik T, Mir LM, Miklavcic D (2005) Sequential finite element model of tissue electropermeabilization. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 52(5):816–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo JK, Woo EJ (2011) Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT). SIAM Rev 53(1):40–68

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stehling MK, Guenther E, Mikus P, Klein N, Rubinsky L, Rubinsky B (2016) Synergistic combination of electrolysis and electroporation for tissue ablation. PLoS One 11(2), e0148,317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wang Y, Yang W, Wang Z, Hu L (2010) Conductivity image reconstruction of oblique slice with C-shaped open permanent magnet MRI systems. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 20(3):814–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matej Kranjc or Damijan Miklavčič .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kranjc, M., Miklavčič, D. (2017). Electric Field Distribution and Electroporation Threshold. In: Miklavčič, D. (eds) Handbook of Electroporation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32886-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics