Abstract
Exposure of cells to high intensity electric fields can lead to death of some cells due to irreversible electroporation or due to electroporation-induced secondary effects. If cells are exposed to these fields in the presence of various exogenous molecules, cell death can also be induced due to their activity in the cells. In all these cases, mechanisms of cell death as well as the time periods over which death of these cells occur are highly variable. Therefore, application of different cell viability assays can lead to inconsistent results, either depending on the assay itself or the application time. The aim of this chapter is to provide a brief presentation of viability assays that have been employed in electroporation-based applications and provide a short discussion on choosing the specific cell viability assay to properly interpret the obtained results. Since most of cell viability assays (all tetrazolium salt-based assays, resazurin assay, calcein acetoxymethyl ester (calcein AM) assay, crystal violet (CV) assay, evaluation of necrosis and/or apoptosis, etc.) are applied at time points when death of some cells in the treated population is still in progress, they cannot provide precise viability results. Therefore, those who seek to evaluate cell viability as precisely as possible should rely on end-point clonogenic assay. Other cell viability assays can be applied in parallel with clonogenic assay or at least should be tested in pilot experiments before they are employed routinely in a specific set of experiments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altman SA, Randers L, Rao G (1993) Comparison of trypan blue dye exclusion and fluorometric assays for mammalian cell viability determinations. Biotechnol Prog 9(6):671–674. doi:10.1021/bp00024a017
Atale N, Gupta S, Yadav UC, Rani V (2014) Cell-death assessment by fluorescent and nonfluorescent cytosolic and nuclear staining techniques. J Microsc 255(1):7–19. doi:10.1111/jmi.12133
Berridge MV, Herst PM, Tan AS (2005) Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction. Biotechnol Annu Rev 11:127–152. doi:10.1016/S1387-2656(05)11004-7
Cali JJ, Niles A, Valley MP, O’Brien MA, Riss TL, Shultz J (2008) Bioluminescent assays for ADMET. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 4(1):103–120. doi:10.1517/17425255.4.1.103
Cepurniene K, Ruzgys P, Treinys R, Satkauskiene I, Satkauskas S (2010) Influence of plasmid concentration on DNA electrotransfer in vitro using high-voltage and low-voltage pulses. J Membr Biol 236(1):81–85. doi:10.1007/s00232-010-9270-5
Fonseca PC, Nihei OK, Savino W, Spray DC, Alves LA (2006) Flow cytometry analysis of gap junction-mediated cell-cell communication: advantages and pitfalls. Cytometry A 69(6):487–493. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20255
Franken NA, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C (2006) Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc 1(5):2315–2319. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.339
Gabriel B, Teissie J (1995) Control by electrical parameters of short- and long-term cell death resulting from electropermeabilization of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1266(2):171–178
Gehl J, Skovsgaard T, Mir LM (1998) Enhancement of cytotoxicity by electropermeabilization: an improved method for screening drugs. Anticancer Drugs 9(4):319–325
Gillies RJ, Didier N, Denton M (1986) Determination of cell number in monolayer cultures. Anal Biochem 159(1):109–113
Hansen EL, Sozer EB, Romeo S, Frandsen SK, Vernier PT, Gehl J (2015) Dose-dependent ATP depletion and cancer cell death following calcium electroporation, relative effect of calcium concentration and electric field strength. PLoS One 10(4):e0122973. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122973
Jakstys B, Ruzgys P, Tamosiunas M, Satkauskas S (2015) Different cell viability assays reveal inconsistent results after bleomycin electrotransfer in vitro. J Membr Biol 248(5):857–863. doi:10.1007/s00232-015-9813-x
Kinosita K Jr, Tsong TY (1977) Voltage-induced pore formation and hemolysis of human erythrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 471(2):227–242
Li J, Zhang D, Ward KM, Prendergast GC, Ayene IS (2012) Hydroxyethyl disulfide as an efficient metabolic assay for cell viability in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro 26(4):603–612. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2012.01.007
Marjanovic I, Kanduser M, Miklavcic D, Keber MM, Pavlin M (2014) Comparison of flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy and spectrofluorometry for analysis of gene electrotransfer efficiency. J Membr Biol 247(12):1259–1267. doi:10.1007/s00232-014-9714-4
Marshall NJ, Goodwin CJ, Holt SJ (1995) A critical assessment of the use of microculture tetrazolium assays to measure cell growth and function. Growth Regul 5(2):69–84
Neumann E, Rosenheck K (1972) Permeability changes induced by electric impulses in vesicular membranes. J Membr Biol 10(3):279–290
Page B, Page M, Noel C (1993) A new fluorometric assay for cytotoxicity measurements in-vitro. Int J Oncol 3(3):473–476
Pehlivanova VN, Tsoneva IH, Tzoneva RD (2012) Multiple effects of electroporation on the adhesive behaviour of breast cancer cells and fibroblasts. Cancer Cell Int 12(1):9. doi:10.1186/1475-2867-12-9
Rols MP, Teissie J (1990) Electropermeabilization of mammalian cells. Quantitative analysis of the phenomenon. Biophys J 58(5):1089–1098. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82451-6
Stoddart MJ (2011) Cell viability assays: introduction. Methods Mol Biol 740:1–6. doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-108-6_1
Venslauskas MS, Satkauskas S (2015) Mechanisms of transfer of bioactive molecules through the cell membrane by electroporation. Eur Biophys J 44(5):277–289. doi:10.1007/s00249-015-1025-x
Wang S, Yu H, Wickliffe JK (2011) Limitation of the MTT and XTT assays for measuring cell viability due to superoxide formation induced by nano-scale TiO2. Toxicol In Vitro 25(8):2147–2151. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2011.07.007
Wu Y, Tibrewal N, Birge RB (2006) Phosphatidylserine recognition by phagocytes: a view to a kill. Trends Cell Biol 16(4):189–197. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2006.02.003
Yin LM, Wei Y, Wang Y, Xu YD, Yang YQ (2013) Long term and standard incubations of WST-1 reagent reflect the same inhibitory trend of cell viability in rat airway smooth muscle cells. Int J Med Sci 10(1):68–72. doi:10.7150/ijms.5256
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by Research Council of Lithuania.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Šatkauskas, S., Jakštys, B., Ruzgys, P., Jakutavičiūtė, M. (2017). Different Cell Viability Assays Following Electroporation In Vitro. In: Miklavčič, D. (eds) Handbook of Electroporation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32886-7_140
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32886-7_140
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32885-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32886-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering
