Skip to main content

Institutional Investors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Asset Management and Institutional Investors

Abstract

This chapter analyses the different types of institutional investors, institutions which, with various objectives, professionally manage portfolios of financial and real assets on behalf of a plurality of investors. Actually, the lowest common denominator among all categories of institutional investors is represented by the professional management of assets on behalf of a wide variety of individuals. Such management can be carried out on a collective basis, as in the case of investment funds, or on an individual basis, as in the case of discretionary mandates given on a client-by-client basis. If we accept this principle, we can consider the institutional investors as follows: collective investment vehicles; individual portfolio management, based on mandates given by clients on a single and discretionary basis; insurance companies; pension funds; institutions for occupational or personal retirement provisions; foundations and endowments. In this chapter, the development factors and benefits for the financial system generated by institutional investors are identified and a comparison is made at the international level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Davis and Steil (2001).

  2. 2.

    Directive 2014/65/EU, Annex 2.

  3. 3.

    Directive 2014/65/EU, Annex 2.

  4. 4.

    Assuming a more extensive definition of institutional investor, we can include banks, given their need of managing securities in the proprietary book, and also sovereign funds, for their necessity of managing diversified asset portfolios.

  5. 5.

    The different categories of CIVs will be discussed further in Chap. 2.

  6. 6.

    Çelik and Isaksson (2013).

  7. 7.

    Bushee (2001).

  8. 8.

    Blake (2006).

  9. 9.

    Acharya and Dimson (2007).

  10. 10.

    Advisory and management functions are integrated into the fiduciary manager model, which is largely widespread in Anglo-Saxon countries, which manages the assets of an institution as a whole, sub-delegating the management of specific sectors to ad hoc selected managers. In this way, without stirring conflicts of interest, a unitary direction to all management activities and a more effective risk control are ensured. Refer to van Nunen (2007).

  11. 11.

    Vittas (1998).

  12. 12.

    Davis and Steil (2001).

  13. 13.

    OECD (1998).

  14. 14.

    De Hann et al. (2015).

  15. 15.

    Bratton and McCahery (2015).

  16. 16.

    Vittas (1998).

  17. 17.

    Piotroski (2004).

  18. 18.

    Ryan (2002).

  19. 19.

    Rubach (2009).

  20. 20.

    About this widely investigated topic, see Webb et al. (2003), Ingley and van der Walt (2004) and Picou (2008).

  21. 21.

    OECD (2011).

  22. 22.

    Public pension reserve funds (PPRFs) include Australia’s Future Fund, Belgium’s Zilverfonds (2008–2013), Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Chile’s Pension Reserve Fund (2010–2013), Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund, Korea’s National Pension Service, New Zealand Superannuation Fund, Government Pension Fund of Norway, Poland’s Demographic Reserve Fund, Portugal’s Social Security Financial Stabilization Fund, Spain’s Social Security Reserve Fund, Sweden’s AP1–AP4 and AP6, United States’ Social Security Trust Fund.

  23. 23.

    OECD (2015).

  24. 24.

    OECD (2015).

  25. 25.

    OECD (2014a).

  26. 26.

    OECD (2014b).

  27. 27.

    OECD (2014c).

  28. 28.

    OECD (2014b).

References

  • Acharya S, Dimson E (2007) Endowment asset management. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blake D (2006) Pension finance. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton WW, McCahery JA (2015) Institutional investor activism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushee B (2001) Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemp Account Res 18(2):207–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çelik S, Isaksson M (2013) Institutional investors and ownership engagement. Financ Market Trends 2013/2(105):93–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis EP, Steil B (2001) Institutional investors. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hann J, Oosterloo S, Schoenmaker D (2015) Financial markets and institutions. A European perspective, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingley CB, van der Walt NT (2004) Corporate governance, institutional investors and conflicts of interest. Corp Gov 12(4):534–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1998) Institutional investors in the new financial landscape. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) The role of institutional investors in promoting good corporate governance. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014a) Global insurance market trends. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014b) OECD pensions outlook. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014c) Pension markets in focus. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015) OECD insurance statistics. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Picou A (2008) Does good governance matter to institutional investor? Evidence from the enactment of corporate governance guidelines. J Bus Ethics 65(1):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotroski JP (2004) The influence of analyst, institutional investors and insiders on the incorporation of market, industry and firm-specific information into stock prices. Account Rev 79(4):1119–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubach MJ (2009) Determinants of institutional investor activism: a test of the Ryan-Schneider Model (2002). J Manag Issues 21(2):245–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan LV (2002) The antecedents of institutional investor activism. Acad Manag Rev 27(4):554–573

    Google Scholar 

  • van Nunen A (2007) Fiduciary management. Blueprint for pension fund excellence. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittas D (1998) Institutional investors and securities markets. Which comes first? Policy Research Working Paper, The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb R, Beck M, McKinnon R (2003) Problems and limitations of institutional investor participation in corporate governance. Corp Gov 11(1):65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignazio Basile .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Basile, I. (2016). Institutional Investors. In: Basile, I., Ferrari, P. (eds) Asset Management and Institutional Investors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32796-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics