Skip to main content

Using Performance Measurement in Healthcare Analytics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 57))

  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHR) embody a large volume of measured values and records of clinical encounters. Data is produced in healthcare settings at a large rate. Medical researchers find themselves facing massive volumes of data that should be reviewed and analysed before making clinical decisions that affect the lives of patients. The aim of this study is to apply the performance measurement approach used in finance and engineering to the EHR systems and develop a new system that allows clinicians who are not computer experts to analyse and query the EHR for better clinical decisions. Sources of healthcare data are numerous: nurses, doctors, technicians, patients, pharmaceutical companies, and third-party payers. Data is collected and stored from different sources such as computerised patient files, laboratory and diagnostic machinery, wired and wireless monitoring devices attached to patients across the various care-giver encounters, and many other electronic files and databases. Decision-support is critical in management of healthcare organizations. Data is collected for analysis, but requires organization of structure, design of systems to analyse the data, and technical knowledge from the management. This study aims at developing a novel system for the analysis of EHR data through the application of Performance Measurement and Management (PMM). This is achieved through investigation of the current situation and the state-of-the-art in clinical analytics, and then modifying the solutions to take advantage of PMM.

The original version of this chapter was inadvertently published with an incorrect chapter pagination 828–833 and DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_161. The page range and the DOI has been re-assigned. The correct page range is 834–839 and the DOI is 10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_162. The erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_260

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_260

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akçura et. al. 2014. “Drug prescription behavior and decision support systems”, Decision Support Systems, Volume 57

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fleming et. al. 2014. “Using the theory of planned behavior to examine pharmacists’ intention to utilize a prescription drug monitoring program database”, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Volume 10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Syed-Abdul et. al. 2014. “A smart medication recommendation model for the electronic prescription”, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Volume 117

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fung et. al. 2013. “Comparison of Electronic Pharmacy Prescription Records With Manually Collected Medication Histories in an Emergency Department”, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Volume 62, Number 3

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thanassoulis et. al. 2012. “Estimating the scope for savings in referrals and drug prescription costs in the general Practice units of a UK primary care trust”, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 221

    Google Scholar 

  6. Warholak et. al. 2014. “Assessing the effect of providing a pharmacist with patient diagnosis on electronic prescription orders: A pilot study”, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Volume 10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Villamañán et. al. 2011. “The Assisted Electronic Prescription in Patients Hospitalised in a Chest Diseases Ward”, Archivos de Bronconeumologia, Volume 47, Number 3

    Google Scholar 

  8. Natarajan et. al. 2010. “An analysis of clinical queries in an electronic health record search utility”, Journal of Medical Informatics, Volume 79

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chard et. al. 2011. “A Cloud-based Approach to Medical NLP”, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Volume 0

    Google Scholar 

  10. Park et. al. 2010. “Use of an automated clinical management system improves outpatient immunosuppressive care following liver transplantation”, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Volume 17

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sittig et. al. 2010. “The state of the art in clinical knowledge management: An inventory of tools and techniques”, Journal of Medical Informatics, Volume 79

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hayrinen et. al. 2008. “Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records. A review of the research literature”, Journal of Medical Informatics, Volume 77

    Google Scholar 

  13. ZHOU et. al. 2009. “The Relationship between Electronic Health Record Use and Quality of Care over Time”, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Volume 16, Number 4

    Google Scholar 

  14. Linmans et. al. 2012. “Using electronic medical records analysis to investigate the effectiveness of lifestyle programs in real-world primary care is challenging - a case study in diabetes mellitus”, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Volume 65

    Google Scholar 

  15. Geissbuhler et. al. 2012. “Trustworthy reuse of health data: A transnational perspective”, Journal of Medical Informatics

    Google Scholar 

  16. Himmelstein et. al. 2009. “Hospital Computing and the Costs and Quality of Care: A National Study”, American Journal of Medicine

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robertson et. al. 2010. “Implementation and adoption of nation- wide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation”, British Medical Journal, Volume 341

    Google Scholar 

  18. Urowitz et. al. 2008. “Is Canada ready for patient accessible electronic health records? A national scan”, Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Volume 33, Number 8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kierkegaard et. al. 2011. “Electronic health record: Wiring Europe’s healthcare”, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 27

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stroetmann et. al. 2012. “United in Diversity: Legal Challenges on the Road Towards Interoperable eHealth Solutions in Europe”, European Journal for Biomedical Informatics, Volume 8, Number 2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fadi Louis Nammour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nammour, F.L., Mansour, N., Danas, K. (2016). Using Performance Measurement in Healthcare Analytics. In: Kyriacou, E., Christofides, S., Pattichis, C. (eds) XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_162

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_162

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32701-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32703-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics