Skip to main content

Comparison and Classification of Acoustic Levels of MRI Sequences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 57))

  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

At the present time, medical imaging based on the principle of magnetic resonance represents an essential part of modern diagnostics. In proportion to the expansion of its clinical applications grow the requirements on technical solutions. Higher gradient fields bring improvement of image quality, but at the same time significantly raise the level of noise generated during the examination. Numerous studies dealing with this issue led to technical improvements in the design of MRI scanners in order to reduce to a minimum the peak noise, long-term acoustic exposure, and consequently the risk of damage of hearing organs of the patient and the staff. The time factor is also nonnegligible – the longer the examination lasts, the greater the risk of possible damage to the auditory organ is, especially for long-term exposed persons. Ensuring acoustic comfort during the examination – while maintaining high diagnostic yield – is an important aim of modern MR diagnosis. This article summarizes the results of experimental measurements on a widespread 1.5 T MR scanner. The most commonly used MR sequences were investigated. The results of this article should contribute to the results achieved so far and will hopefully lead to a proposal and implementation for both passive and active reduction of noise.

The original version of this chapter was inadvertently published with an incorrect chapter pagination 768–772 and DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_150. The page range and the DOI has been re-assigned. The correct page range is 774–778 and the DOI is 10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_151. The erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_260

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_260

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kanal, E., Shellock, F.G. and Sonnenblick, D.: MRI clinical site safety survey: phase 1 results and preliminary data (abstr). Magn. Reson. Imaging, 7 (S1), 106 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Statement, Medical magnetic resonance procedures: protection of patients. Health Physics 2004;87:197-216

    Google Scholar 

  3. Katsunuma, A., H. Takamori, Y. Sakakura, Y. Hamamura, Y. Ogo a R. Katayama. Quiet MRI with novel acoustic noise reduction.Magma: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology, and Medicine. 2001, 13(3): 139-144. DOI: 10.1007/BF02678588. ISSN 1352-8661

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mansfield PM, et al. Active acoustic screening: design principles for quiet gradient coils in MRI. Meas Sci Technol 1994;5:1021-1025

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mansfield PM, Glover PM. Beaumont J Sound generation in gradient coil structures for MRI. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:539-550

    Google Scholar 

  6. IEC 60601-2-33. Medical electrical equipment- Part 2: Particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elder JA. Special senses. In: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Health Effects Research Laboratory. Biological Effects of Radio frequency Radiation. EPA-600/8- 83-026F, Research Triangle Park, 1984; pp. 570-571

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hurwitz, R., Lane, S.R., Bell, R.A. and Brant-Zawadzki, M.N.: Acoustic analysis of gradient coil noise in MR imaging. Radiology, 173, 545–548 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McJury, M., Blug, A., Joerger, C., Condon, B. and Wyper, D.: Acoustic noise levels during magnetic resonance imaging scanning at 1.5T. Br. J. Radiol., 67, 413–415 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shellock, F.G., Morisoli, S.M. and Mokhtar, Z.: Measurement of acoustic noise during MR imaging: evaluation of six “worse- case” pulse sequences. Radiology, 191, 91–93 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McJury M. Acoustic Noise and Magnetic Resonance Procedures. In: Magnetic Resonance Procedures: Health Effects and Safety. FG Shellock, Editor, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  12. McJury M, Shellock FG. Acoustic noise and MR procedures: A review. J Magn Reson Imag 2000;12:37-45

    Google Scholar 

  13. McJury M, et al. The use of active noise control (ANC) to reduce acoustic noise generated during MRI scanning: some initial results. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1997;15:319-322

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cho ZH, et al. Analysis of acoustic noise in MRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1997;15:815-822

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heismann, B., Ott, M., Grodzki, D.: Sequence-based acoustic noise reduction of clinical MRI scans.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2015, 73(3): 1104-1109. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25229. ISSN 07403194

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Y., Liu, F., Weber, E., Tang, F., Jin, J., Tesiram, Y., Crozier, S.: Acoustic analysis for a split MRI system using FE method. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering. 2015, 45(2): 85-96. DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.21283. ISSN 15525031

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pribil, J., Pribilova, A., Frollo, I.: Mapping and Spectral Analysis of Acoustic Vibration in the Scanning Area of the Weak Field Magnetic Resonance Imager. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics. 2014, 136(5): 051009-. DOI: 10.1115/1.4027791. ISSN 0739-3717

    Google Scholar 

  18. Counter, S. A., Olofson, A., Grahn, H. F., Borg, E.: MRI acoustic noise: Sound pressure and frequency analysis. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1997, 7(3): 606-611. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070327. ISSN 10531807

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hattori Y, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2007;69:23-28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iveta Bryjová .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bryjová, I., Kubicek, J., Skutova, H. (2016). Comparison and Classification of Acoustic Levels of MRI Sequences. In: Kyriacou, E., Christofides, S., Pattichis, C. (eds) XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_151

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_151

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32701-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32703-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics