Abstract
The Porto Metropolitan Area is a region in northern Portugal with approximately 2000 km2. Almost 16 % of the Portuguese population lives in the area, which is structured around the municipality of Porto with 16 other municipalities included. The region is a jigsaw puzzle of urban, agricultural, and forest areas. The Porto Metropolitan Area Environmental Strategic Plan, a broad participatory regional planning process conducted from 2003 to 2008, concluded that major challenges ahead included the improvement of the green infrastructure (forest, riverside areas, and natural corridors), the need for education and training for sustainability, as well as more and better interinstitutional coordination. In order to tackle these vital regional issues several institutions, partners within the framework of the Porto Metropolitan Area Regional Centre of Expertise on Education for Sustainable Development, decided to collaborate in order to design and implement a flagship project. The FUTURE—the 100,000 trees project in the Porto Metropolitan Area is the outcome of this process. Its purpose is to create, restore and care for native urban forests in the region with active involvement of the main stakeholders (landowners, citizens, local governments, central government, companies, non-governmental organisations, and schools, among others). Our aim is to present the case study of this project describing its context, scale, institutional framework, actors and partnerships, resources and processes, highlighting its governance model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antrop, M. (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67(1), 9–26.
Área Metropolitana do Porto. (2014). AMP 2020 Estratégia de Base Territorial. Porto.
Área Metropolitana do Porto. (n.d.). Prioridades de desenvolvimento para 2007–2013. Retrieved October 23, 2015, from http://tinyurl.com/h2nt8k2
Armson, D., Stringer, P., & Ennos, A. (2013). The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(3), 282–286.
Astell-Burt, T., Feng, X., & Kolt, G. (2013). Does access to neighbourhood green space promote a healthy duration of sleep? Novel findings from a cross-sectional study of 259 319 Australians. BMJ Open, 3(8), 1–6.
Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 248–260). London: SAGE Publications.
Bentsen, P., Lindholst, A., & Konijnendijk, C. (2010). Reviewing eight years of Urban Forestry & Urban Greening: Taking stock, looking ahead. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(4), 273–280.
Berman, M., Marc, G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212.
Bratman, G., Hamilton, J., & Daily, G. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249(1), 118–136.
Buttoud, G., Kouplevatskaya-Buttoud, I., Slee, B., & Weiss, G. (2011). Barriers to institutional learning and innovations in the forest sector in Europe: Markets, policies and stakeholders. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(2), 124–131.
Caldecott, B., Lomax, G., & Workman, M. (2015). Stranded carbon assets and negative emissions technologies. Stranded Assets Programme. University of Oxford.
Câmara Municipal do Porto. (n.d.). A árvore no espaço urbano. Retrieved November 05, 2015, from http://tinyurl.com/glkyxbw
Cardinale, B., Duffy, J., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D., Perrings, C., Venail, P., et al. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486(7401), 59–67.
Carney, S., Green, N., Wood, R., & Read, R. (2009). Greenhouse gas emissions inventories—Brochure for individual regions. Porto: Centre for Urban and Regional Ecology of the School of Environment and Development of the University of Manchester.
Connolly, J., Svendsen, E., Fisher, D., & Campbell, L. (2013). Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 76–84.
Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F., & Tilman, D. (2006). Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biology, 4(8), 1300–1305.
Direcção Nacional de Gestão Florestal. (2010). Relatório Final do 5.º Inventário Florestal Nacional. Retrieved November 02, 2015, from http://tinyurl.com/ozypezy
European Commission. (2013a). Commission Staff Working Document—Technical information on green infrastructure (GI) accompanying the document “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Green Infrastructure (Gi)—Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital”. (SWD (2013) 155 final). Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/jfhyw3e
European Commission. (2013b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Green Infrastructure (Gi)—Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. (COM(2013) 249 final). Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/jh2ba46
European Environment Agency. (2015). Water-retention potential of Europe’s forests—A European overview to support natural water-retention measures EEA Technical report.
George, A., & Bennett, A. (2004). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gill, S., Handley, J., Ennos, A., & Pauleit, S. (2007). Adapting cities for climate change: The role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment, 33(1), 115–133.
Grupo de Estudos Ambientais da Universidade Católica Portuguesa (Producer). (2006a). Futuro Sustentável - Diagnóstico de Ambiente do Grande Porto: Educação Ambiental/Educação para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável (Versão para consulta pública) (pp. 451): Lipor. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/zprjle9
Grupo de Estudos Ambientais da Universidade Católica Portuguesa (Producer). (2006b). Futuro Sustentável - Diagnóstico de Ambiente do Grande Porto: Ordenamento do Território, Espaços Verdes e Áreas Naturais (Versão para consulta pública) (pp. 151): Lipor. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/zprjle9
Grupo de Estudos Ambientais da Universidade Católica Portuguesa (Producer). (2008a, 2006). Futuro Sustentável - Plano de Acção (Síntese para consulta pública) (pp. 14): Lipor. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/hq33ue8
Grupo de Estudos Ambientais da Universidade Católica Portuguesa (Producer). (2008b, 2006). Futuro Sustentável [Fase de alargamento] - Diagnóstico de Ambiente do Grande Porto: Educação para a Sustentabilidade (Versão para consulta pública) (pp. 64): Lipor. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/zmblg2b
Grupo de Estudos Ambientais da Universidade Católica Portuguesa (Producer). (2015). FUTURO - Relatório de Monitorização (2015) (pp. 28): Lipor. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/gmxo8wv
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In D. Raffaelli & C. Frid (Eds.), Ecosystem Ecology: A new synthesis (pp. 110–139). Cambridge: CUP.
Haluza, D., Schönbauer, R., & Cervinka, R. (2014). Green perspectives for public health: A narrative review on the physiological effects of experiencing outdoor nature. International journal of environmental research and public health, 11(5), 5445–5461.
Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas. (2006). PROF AMPEDV - Plano Regional de Ordenamento Florestal da Área Metropolitana do Porto e Entre Douro e Vouga. Retrieved November 16, 2015, from http://tinyurl.com/ock98vt
Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2014). Resident population by place of residence. Retrieved November 20, 2015, http://tinyurl.com/o8b3aq7
Jim, C. (2011). Holistic research agenda for sustainable management and conservation of urban woodlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 375–379.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1986). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kearns, R. (2000). Being there: Research through observing and participating. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 103–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kleerekoper, L., Esch, M., & Salcedo, T. (2012). How to make a city climate-proof, addressing the urban heat island effect. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 64, 30–38.
Konijnendijk, C., Ricard, R., Kenney, A., & Randrup, T. (2006). Defining urban forestry—A comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4(3), 93–103.
Kronenberg, J. (2015). Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 12, 218–227.
Lawrence, A., de Vreese, R., Johnston, M., van den Bosch, C., & Sanesi, G. (2013). Urban forest governance: Towards a framework for comparing approaches. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(4), 464–473.
McDonald, A., Bealey, W., Fowler, D., Dragosits, U., Skiba, U., Smith, et al. (2007). Quantifying the effect of urban tree planting on concentrations and depositions of PM 10 in two UK conurbations. Atmospheric Environment, 41(38), 8455–8467.
McKinney, M. (2002). Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation the impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience, 52(10), 883–890.
Mell, I. (2009). Can green infrastructure promote urban sustainability? Proceedings of the ICE-Engineering Sustainability, 162(1), 23–34.
Naumann, S., Davis, M., Kaphengst, T., Pieterse, M., & Rayment, M. (2011). Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects. Ecologic institute and GHK Consulting.
Norton, B., Coutts, A., Livesley, S., Harris, R., Hunter, A., & Williams, N. (2015). Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 127–138.
Nowak, D., & Dwyer, J. (2007). Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In J. Kuser (Ed.), Urban and community forestry in the Northeast (pp. 25–46). Netherlands: Springer.
Nowak, D., & Heisler, G. (2010). Air quality effects of urban trees and parks. National Recreation and Park Association.
Oliveira, S., Andrade, H., & Vaz, T. (2011). The cooling effect of green spaces as a contribution to the mitigation of urban heat: A case study in Lisbon. Building and Environment, 46(11), 2186–2194.
Pinto, M., & Almeida, C. (2013). FUTURE—The 100,000 trees project in Porto Metropolitan Area: 2011–2013 Report (p. 22). Porto: Catholic University of Portugal.
Pinto, M., & Silva, M. (2013). RCE Porto: The 100,000 trees project. In Z. Fadeeva & U. Payyappallimana (Eds.), Traditional knowledge and biodiversity: Learning for conservation and revitalisation of natural and cultural resources. Yokohama: United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.
Power, T. (2005). The supply and demand for natural amenities: An overview of theory and concepts. In G. Green, S. Deller, & D. Marcouiller (Eds.), Amenities and rural development: Theory, methods and public policy (pp. 63–77). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Randrup, T., Konijnendijk, C., Dobbertin, M., & Prüller, R. (2005). The concept of urban forestry in Europe. In C. Konijnendijk, K. Nilsson, T. Randrup, & J. Schipperijn (Eds.), Urban forests and trees: A reference book (pp. 9–21). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Rodríguez-Loinaz, G., Amezaga, I., & Onaindia, M. (2013). Use of native species to improve carbon sequestration and contribute towards solving the environmental problems of the timberlands in Biscay, Northern Spain. Journal of Environmental Management, 120, 18–26.
Schmied, A., & Pillmann, W. (2003). Tree protection legislation in European cities. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2, 115–124.
Secco, L., Pettenella, D., & Gatto, P. (2011). Forestry governance and collective learning process in Italy: Likelihood or utopia? Forest Policy and Economics, 13(2), 104–112.
Secco, L., Re, R., Pettenella, D., & Gatto, P. (2014). Why and how to measure forest governance at local level: A set of indicators. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 57–71.
Soares, A., Rego, F., McPherson, E., Simpson, J., Peper, P., & Xiao, Q. (2011). Benefits and costs of street trees in Lisbon, Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(2), 69–78.
Strohbach, M., Arnold, E., & Haase, D. (2012). The carbon footprint of urban green space—A life cycle approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(2), 220–229.
Tiwary, A., Sinnett, D., Peachey, C., Chalabi, Z., Vardoulakis, S., Fletcher, T., et al. (2009). An integrated tool to assess the role of new planting in PM 10 capture and the human health benefits: A case study in London. Environmental pollution, 157(10), 2645–2653.
Tsunetsugu, Y., Lee, J., Park, B., Tyrväinen, L., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2013). Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landscape and Urban Planning, 113, 90–93.
Tyrväinen, L., Pauleit, S., Seeland, K., & de Vries, S. (2005). Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees. In C. Konijnendijk, K. Nilsson, T. Randrup & J. Schipperijn (Eds.), Urban forests and trees: A reference book (pp. 81–87). Berlin: Springer.
UNU-IAS. (2010). Five years of regional centres of expertise on ESD (p. 124). UNU-IAS: Yokohama.
Young, R., & McPherson, E. (2013). Governing metropolitan green infrastructure in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 67–75.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank all citizens and organisations involved with the FUTURE—the 100,000 trees project in the Porto Metropolitan Area. Their work and enthusiasm towards this common green goal makes all efforts worthwhile.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pinto, M., Almeida, C., Pereira, A.M., Silva, M. (2016). Urban Forest Governance: FUTURE—The 100,000 Trees Project in the Porto Metropolitan Area. In: Castro, P., Azeiteiro, U., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Leal Filho, W., Azul, A. (eds) Biodiversity and Education for Sustainable Development . World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32318-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32318-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32317-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32318-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)