Skip to main content

Water, Land, Socioterritorial Movements, Labour, and Capital: Territorial Disputes and Conflictuality in Brazil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agriculture, Environment and Development

Abstract

This chapter is the result of a collective effort by a group of geographers in which we propose a territorialized reading of certain complex questions related to water, land, socioterritorial movements, capital, and labour in contemporary Brazil. Our starting point is that an understanding of territorial issues is fundamental as part of an integrated approach to sectoral issues, and that we need to understand territory as being something more than just the ground surface of an area of land. Territory is more than surface; people are also territories. We make reference to actions that produce social relations and, in that sense, create territories. People create territories as much as territories create people. Territories and people are therefore inseparable. We emphasize the complexity of socioterritorial relations, and argue that a territorialized understanding is essential when analysing disputes over natural resources and the processes that produce new territories. Territorial disputes are key when considering power relations through a typology of territories, meaning that a multidimensional analysis is required; in a one-dimensional examination of a territory as simply an area of land, these realities are likely to be overlooked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Itaparica is located between the States of Bahia and Pernambuco in the São Francisco basin.

  2. 2.

    The Middle San Francisco Trade Union Hub was the main inter-union organization that arranged rural workers of many municipalities of the Meddle São Francisco and the Land Pastoral Commission (CPT) in the 1970s and 1980s.

  3. 3.

    According to A Enchente do Uruguai [The Flood of Uruguay], the Congress was attended by over 200 participants from different entities, including representatives of the Brazilian Social Democracy Party (PSDB), Workers’ Party (PT), Brazilian Socialist Party (PSB), Communist Party of Brazil (PC do B), and Democratic Labour Party (PDT). The Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB) sent a letter of solidarity.

  4. 4.

    It was also decided that the 14th of March would be marked annually as the National Day of Action Against Dams.

  5. 5.

    On socioterritorial movements, see Sobreiro Filho (2013).

  6. 6.

    This region is characterized by low rainfall rates, which, together with intensive land and water management, contribute to high levels of labour exploitation and expropriation of the poor groups in the area. This process of socionatural exploitation was established centuries ago through political alliances between the state apparatus and large landholders. These relationships have been reconfigured in recent decades, with the high levels of capital injection from the export of tropical fruits and the building of public dams and irrigation canals.

  7. 7.

    States (or provinces) that will be beneficiaries of the water transfer from the São Francisco River.

  8. 8.

    According to Brandão (2010), the appropriation and expropriation of abundant territorial resources and permanent primitive accumulation are fundamental elements in Brazilian history. The fact that Brazil’s national territory is both vast and heterogeneous has allowed the national elites who control it to subordinate the general population. The country’s territory has been turned into a mere operational base and platform for capital circulation, as well as a locus of human and environmental predation.

  9. 9.

    Through these channels, the transfer of water could feed irrigation perimeters (14 in the States of Ceará, 5 in Rio Grande do Norte, 3 Paraíba, and 4 in Pernambuco), which is likely to merely (re)produce social inequalities, poisoning/killing workers (see note 11, below) and affecting their living conditions, while facilitating the expansion of capitalist relations.

  10. 10.

    The Urucuia aquifer, located in the middle portion of the basin, is considered the “lungs of the São Francisco River”, especially during the dry season (from April to September) and is the source of a large portion of the river’s flow. However, the doctoral research project entitled “From Hidden to Visible: Earth-Water-Work and Agro-hydro-business Territorial Conglomerates in Western Bahia” (Cunha 2013), identified about 1000 central pivots and 2.5 million hectares of cultivated land in aquifer recharge areas. This means that the production structure based on large-scale agribusiness has contributed significantly to reducing the flow in the São Francisco River.

  11. 11.

    The ten largest agribusiness corporations in operation in Brazil are: JBS, Raízen (Cosan e Shell), Cosan, Bunge, BRF, Cargill, Marfrig, Nestlé, Copersucar, and Louis Dreyfuss.

  12. 12.

    Raquel Rigotto, medicine professor at the Federal University of Ceará, has conducted research in the State of Ceará on irrigation perimeters that receive water from the São Francisco water transfer project that has detected significant poisoning of workers by chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The researcher identifies severe threats to the health and life of these workers, including carcinoma, genetic disorders, and acute contamination, among others.

  13. 13.

    There are circumstances that, according to the Brazilian Penal Code, bear a resemblance to slavery situations, given serious human degradation, violation of basic rights, unacceptable health and live risks, long working days, forced work due to debts, and so on.

  14. 14.

    According to the CPT, the main organization in charge of collecting conflict data, there has been a growing number of incidents over the last decade, especially in the territories of primary commodity exports, including agribusiness, hydropower sites, roads and railways, mining, and so on.

References

  • Almeida, A.W.B. 2010. Agroestratégias e Desterritorialização: Direitos Territoriais e Étnicos na Mira dos Estratégistas dos Agronegócios. In Capitalismo Globalizado e Recursos Territoriais: Fronteiras da Acumulação no Brasil Contemporâneo, 101–143. Lamparina: Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANA (National Water Agency).2012. A Questão da Água no Nordeste. Centro de Estudos Estratégicos: Brasília.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antunes, R.1999. Os Sentidos do Trabalho: Ensaio Sobre a Afirmação e a Negação do Trabalho. Boitempo: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão, C. 2010. Acumulação Primitiva Permanente e Desenvolvimento Capitalista no Brasil Contemporâneo. In Capitalismo Globalizado e Recursos Territoriais: Fronteiras da Acumulação no Brasil Contemporâneo, 36–69. Lamparina: Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, S.H.G.2012. A Questão Agrária no Brasil e a Bancada Ruralista no Congresso Nacional. MSc dissertation (Human Geography). USP: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPT (Pastoral Land Commission).2014. Conflitos no Campo Brasil 2014. CPT: Goiânia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, T.B. 2013. Do Oculto ao Visível: Terra-Água-Trabalho e o Conglomerado Territorial do Agrohidronegócio no Oeste da Bahia. PhD thesis (Geography). UNESP: Presidente Prudente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, G.C.2012. Do “Capital Financeiro na Agricultura” à Economia do Agronegócio: Mudanças Cíclicas em Meio Século (1965–2012). Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exame.2013. As 50 Maiores Empresas Privadas do Brasil. 01 July 2013. Editora Abril: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, B.M.2000. A Formação do MST no Brasil. Vozes: Petrópolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———2009. Sobre a Tipologia de Territórios. In Territórios e Territorialidades: Teorias, Processos e Conflitos, eds. M.A. Saquet and E.S. Sposito, 35–71. São Paulo: Expressão Popular.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———2013. Construindo um Estilo de Pensamento na Questão Agrária: O Debate Paradigmático e o Conhecimento Geográfico. Habilitation [Livre-Docência] thesis (Geography). UNESP: Presidente Prudente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foschiera, A.A. 2009. Da Barranca do Rio para a Periferia dos Centros Urbanos: A Trajetória do Movimento dos Atingidos por Barragens Face às Políticas do Setor Elétrico no Brasil. PhD thesis (Geography). UNESP: Presidente Prudente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioris, A.A.R.2005. Água, Cobrança e Commodity: A Geografia dos Recursos Hídricos no Brasil. Terra Livre 25: 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2010. Da Foz às Nascentes: Análise Histórica e Apropriação Econômica dos Recursos Hídricos no Brasil. In Capitalismo Globalizado e Recursos Territoriais: Fronteiras da Acumulação no Brasil Contemporâneo, 211–255. Lamparina: Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPEA (Institute for Applied Economic Research).2011. Transposição do Rio São Francisco: Análise de Oportunidade de Projeto. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, R.P.2006. Conflito pelo Uso da água do Canal da Redenção: Assentamento Acauã—Aparecida—PB. Undergraduate dissertation (Geography). UFPB: João Pessoa.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAB (Brazilian Movement of Dam-Affected People).1991. A Enchente do Uruguai. Erexim: Comissão Regional de Atingidos por Barragens.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. História do MAB. MAB: São Paulo. Available at: http://www.mabnacional.org.br

  • Rigotto, R. 2013. Dinâmicas, Processos e Confrontos no Desenvolvimento do Capital no Espaço Agrário. Presentation at the VI International Symposium of Agrarian Geography. 22–26 September 2012. UFPB, João Pessoa campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobreiro Filho, J.O.2013. Movimento em Pedaços e os Pedaços em Movimento em Pedaços: Da ocupação do Pontal do Paranapanema à Dissensão dos Movimentos Socioterritoriais Camponeses. MSc dissertation. UNESP: Presidente Prudente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomaz, A. Jr.2008. Por uma Cruzada Contra Fome e o Agrohidronegócio—Nova Agenda Destrutiva do Capitalismo E os Desafios de um Tempo Não Adiado. Revista Pegada 9(1): 8–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Desenvolvimento Destrutivo das Forças Produtivas e a Nova Geografia da Produção de Alimentos. Reforma Agrária em Dados. UNESP: Presidente Prudente. Available at: http://www.reformaagrariaemdados.org.br

  • Vainer, C.B.2002. Águas para a Vida, Não para a Morte: Notas para uma História do Movimento de Atingidos por barragens no Brasil. MAB: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Filho, J.S., Fernandes, B.M., Cunha, T.B. (2016). Water, Land, Socioterritorial Movements, Labour, and Capital: Territorial Disputes and Conflictuality in Brazil. In: Ioris, A. (eds) Agriculture, Environment and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32255-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics