Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

“Who now reads theory?” Given the strange position theory and theorists have in the discipline—it is a required course, a key to research, and a specialization, while also being a course most students dislike, an area that is difficult to publish in, and a position that often goes to those who can teach theory but who research other things—this essay considers the principal roadblocks to teaching theory in the twenty-first century. In particular, the (1) time crunch—or the ever-growing body of theorists and theories, (2) slavish adherence principle—or tendency to take theorists at their literal word, and (3) conceptual crunch—the ever-growing body of concepts that basically mean the same thing, are highlighted. Having done so, the Handbooks vision is laid out: three slightly different pedagogical styles, organized by and around the Handbook’s chapters, provide the reader with a more coherent vision of sociological theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this case, Merton, who had a very different idea than Durkheim did (Hilbert 1989), but in other cases, it is one’s mentor’s interpretation.

References

  • Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of theory. Sociological Theory, 26(2), 173–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrutyn, S. (2013). Teaching sociological theory for a new century: Contending with the time crunch. The American Sociologist, 44(2), 132–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrutyn, S., & Mueller, A. S. (2014). The socioemotional foundations of suicide: A microsociological view of Durkheim’s suicide. Sociological Theory, 32(4), 327–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrutyn, S., & Mueller, A. S. (2015). When too much integration and regulation hurt: Re-envisioning Durkheim’s Altruistic suicide. Society and Mental Health.doi:10.1177/2156869315604346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (1990). Beyond the epistemological dilemma: General theory in a postpositivist mode. Sociological Forum, 5(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F., & Slater, P. E. (1955). Role differentiation in small, decision making groups. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family, socialization and interaction process (pp. 259–306). Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benard, S. (2012). Cohesion from conflict does intergroup conflict motivate intragroup norm enforcement and support for centralized leadership? Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(2), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1958). Relations between performance, rewards, and action-opportunities in small groups. Cambridge: Sociology Department, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1998). The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63, 379–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. J. (2013). Comment on Abrutyn’s “Time Crunch” problem in teaching classical and contemporary sociological theory: Time for the dichotomy to become a trichotomy? American Sociologist, 44, 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1975). Conflict sociology: Towards an explanatory science. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1988). Theoretical sociology. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1994). The microinteractionist tradition. In Four sociological traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., & Gerbasi, A. (2006). Power, dependence, and social exchange. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 194–216). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1977). Masters of sociological thought. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1970). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1893). The division of labor in society (W.D. Halls, Trans.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1897 [1951]). Suicide: A study in sociology (J.A. Spaulding, & G. Simpson, Trans.). Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1915 [1995]). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (1985). Macro-societal analysis—Background, development and indications. In S. N. Eisenstadt & H. J. Helle (Eds.), Macro sociological theory: Perspectives on sociological theory (pp. 7–24). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (1987). Macrosociology and sociological theory: Some new directions. Contemporary Sociology, 16(5), 602–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1141–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (1991). On the macrofoundations of microsociology: Constraint and the exterior reality of structure. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(2), 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (2012). Group culture and the interaction order: Local sociology on the meso-level. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1972). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, R. A. (1989). Durkheim and Merton on anomie: An unexplored contrast and its deritatives. Social Problems, 36(3), 242–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 51–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. A., & Bearman, P. S. (2015). Bringing anomie back in: Exceptional events and excess suicide. Sociological Science, 2, 186–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, T. (1978). A social interactional theory of emotions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The micro-sociological challenge of macro-sociology: Toward a reconstruction of social theory and methodology. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 1–46). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., Thye, S., & Yoon, J. (2009). Social commitments in a depersonalized world. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenaars, A. (2004). Altrusitic suicide: A few reflections. Archives of Suicide Research, 8(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, G. (1988). Rethinking macrosociological theory. American Sociological Review, 53(2), 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizardo, O. (2006). How cultural tastes shape personal networks. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 778–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizardo, O. (2014). The end of theorists: The relevance, opportunities, and pitfalls of theorizing in sociology. In American sociological association. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1845–6 [1972]). The German ideology. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels reader (pp. 146–202). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, A. S., & Abrutyn, S. (2015). Suicidal disclosures among friends: Using social network data to understand suicide contagion. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 56(1), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescosolido, B. A. (2006). Of pride and prejudice: The role of sociology and social networks in integrating the health sciences. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(3), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (2014). Downsides of social capital. PNAS, 111(52), 18407–18408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, A. J. (2009). Longing and belonging: Parents, children, and consumer culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, P. (1927 [1955]). Primitive Man as philosopher. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, I. A. (2013). Power: Relational, discursive, and performative dimensions. Sociological Theory, 31(3), 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shott, S. (1979). Emotion and social life: A symbolic interactionist analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1317–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1874–96). The principles of sociology. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S. (2000). Suicide: A 15-year review of the sociological literature Part 1: Cultural and economic factors. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, 30(2), 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 120–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2008). From mead to structural symbolic interactionism and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 14–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers-Effler, E. (2004). A theory of the self, emotion, and culture. Advances in Group Processes, 21, 273–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1985). In defense of positivism. Sociological Theory, 3(2), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2001). The handbook of sociological theory. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2010a). Theoretical principles of sociology, volume 1: Macrodynamics. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2010b). Theoretical principles of sociology, Volume 2: Microdynamics. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2011). Theoretical principles of sociology, Volume 3: Mesodynamics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., & Montez, J. K. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1 suppl), S54–S66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaisey, S. (2009). Motivation and justification: A dual process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology, 114(+), 1675–1715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1920 [2002]). The protestant ethic and the “Spirit” of capitalism and other writings (P. Baehr, & G. C. Wells, Trans.). New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1946). The social psychology of world religions. In H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 264–301). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1–2). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, M., Colen, C., & Pescosolido, B. A. (2011). The sociology of suicide. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 505–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth Abrutyn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abrutyn, S. (2016). Introduction. In: Abrutyn, S. (eds) Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32250-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61601-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32250-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics