Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Killer Robots: Ethical Issues in the Design of Unmanned Systems for Military Applications

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

Unmanned systems (UMS) in military applications will often play a role in determining the success or failure of combat missions and thus in determining who lives and dies in times of war. Designers of UMS must therefore consider ethical, as well as operational, requirements and limits when developing UMS. The ethical issues involved in UMS design may be grouped under two broad headings: Building Safe Systems and Designing for the Law of Armed Conflict. This chapter identifies and discusses a number of issues under each of these headings and offers some analysis of the implications of each issue and how it might be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • T.K. Adams, Future warfare and the decline of human decision-making. Parameters: U.S. Army War Coll. Q. 31, 57–71 (2001). (Winter 2001–2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, Defense sector accused of muscling in on robots. Prof. Eng. 20(3), 8 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.C. Arkin, Governing lethal behaviour: embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture. Technical report GIT-GVU-07-11 for US Army. Mobile Robot Laboratory, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology (2007). Available at http://www.cc.gatech.edu/ai/robot-lab/online-publications/formalizationv35.pdfat25.10.07

  • R.C. Arkin, Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots (Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, 2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Asaro, Robots and responsibility from a legal prospective, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Baard, Make robots not war: some scientists refuse to get paid for killer ideas. The Village Voice 10–16, 39–44 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.L. Barry, E. Zimet, UCAVs – technological, policy, and operational challenges. Def. Horizons (3) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bender, Attacking Iraq, from a Nev. Computer. Boston Globe, A6 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Blackmore, Dead slow: Unmanned aerial vehicles loitering in battlespace. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 25(3), 195–214 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Boland, Developing reasoning robots for today and tomorrow. Signals 61(6), 43–46 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Butler, Global Hawk UAV supports border ops in Iraq. Aviat. Week Space Technol 166(11), 56 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Canning, A Definitive Work on Factors Impacting the Arming of Unmanned Vehicles (Dahlgren Division Naval Surface Warfare Centre, Washington, DC, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Canning, A concept of operations for armed autonomous systems, in 3rd Annual Disruptive Technology Conference, Washington, DC, 6–7 Sept 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Card, Killer machines. Foreign Policy (May/June): 92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Chapman, Unmanned combat aerial vehicles: Dawn of a new age? Aerosp. Power J. 16(2), 60–73 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Coeckelbergh, Drones, information technology, and distance: Mapping the moral epistemology of remote fighting. Ethics Inf. Technol. 15(2), 87–98 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.L. Cummings, Creating moral buffers in weapon control interface design. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 23(3), 28–33 (2004)., 41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.L. Cummings, Automation and accountability in decision support system interface design. J. Technol. Stud. 32(1), 23–31 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Dalton, Future navies – Present issues. Nav. War Coll. Rev. 59, 17–39 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • S.B. Donnelly, Long-distance warriors. Time Magazine, 4 Dec 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • C.J. Dunlap Jr., Technology: Recomplicating moral life for the nation’s defenders. Parameters: US Army War Coll. Q. (Autumn) 29, 24–53 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Excell, Unmanned aircraft: Out of the shadows. The Engineer, 18 Jan 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Featherstone, The coming robot army. Harper's Magazine, 43–52 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Fielding, Robotics in future land warfare. Aust. Army J. 3(2), 1–10 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Fitzsimonds, T.G. Mahnken, Military officer attitudes toward UAV adoption: Exploring institutional impediments to innovation. Joint Force Q. 46, 96–103 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Foster, Ricochets and replies: First rule of modern warfare. Air Space Power J. 20(1), 14 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Fulghum, Predator’s progress. Aviat. Week Space Technol. 158(9), 48–50 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Graham, America’s robot army. New Statesman 135(4796), 12–15 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Guarini, P. Bello, Robotic warfare: Some challenges in moving from noncivilian to civilian theaters, in Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, ed. by P. Lin, K. Abney, G. A. Bekey, (Cambridge/London, MIT, 2012), pp. 129–144

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Gulam, S.W. Lee, Uninhabited combat aerial vehicles and the law of armed conflict. Aust. Army J. 3(2), 1–14 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hambling, Military builds robotic insects. Wired Magazine, 23 Jan 2007. Available at http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/01/72543

  • C.J. Hanley, Robot-aircraft attack squadron bound for Iraq. Aviation.com. 16 July 2007

  • C.M. Hockmuth, UAVs – the next generation. Air Force Magazine (Feb 2007), pp. 70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kainikara, UCAVs probable lynchpins of future air warfare. Asia-Pac. Def. Rep. 28(6), 42–45 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Kaplan, Hunting the Taliban in Las Vegas. Atlantic Monthly, 4 Aug 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • H.S. Kenyon, Israel deploys robot guardians. Signals 60(7), 41–44 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • H.S. Kenyon, Airborne testbed opens new possibilities. Signals 61(9), 47–49 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Kochan, Automation in the sky. Ind. Robot 32(6), 468–471 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.J. Lazarski, Legal implications of the uninhabited combat aerial vehicle. Air Space Power J. 16(2), 74–83 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Legien, C.-J. Andersson, G. Hansen, UUV and USV: which ‘unmanned’ for what task? Nav. Forces 27(3), 44–51 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Lerner, Robots go to war. Pop. Sci. 268(1), 42–96 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Marchant, R. Arkin, E.T. Barrett, J. Borenstein, L.M. Gaudet, O. Kittrie, P. Lin, G.R. Lucas, R. O’Meara, International governance of autonomous military robots. Columbia Univ. Rev. Sci. Technol. Law 12, 272–315 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Marino, G. Tamburrini, Learning robots and human responsibility. Int. Rev. Inf. Ethics 6, 47–51 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Marks, Armchair warfare. New Sci. 192(2575), 24 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Masey, Towards an unmanned navy: The growing world of UAV, UCAV, USV and UUV. Nav. Forces 27(6), 23–31 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Matthias, The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6, 175–183 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.W. McMains, The marine corps robotics revolution. Mar. Corps Gaz. 88(1), 34–37 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Mitcham, The spectrum of ethical issues associated with the military support of science and technology, in Ethical Issues Associated with Scientific and Technological Research for the Military, Volume 577 of Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, ed. by C. Mitcham, P. Siekevitz, (New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mustin, Future employment of unmanned aerial vehicles. Air Space Power J. 16(2), 86–97 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Robotics Program Master Plan FY2005: Out Front in Harm's Way (Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (AT&L) Defense Systems/Land Warfare and Munitions, Washington, DC, 2005a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Secretary of Defense, Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap: 2005–2030 (Department of Defense, U.S. Government, Washington, DC, 2005b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Secretary of Defense, Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap FY2011–2036 (Department of Defense, U.S. Government, Washington, DC, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Development and Utilisation of Robotics and Unmanned Ground Vehicles: Report to Congress (Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Portfolio Systems Acquisition, Land Warfare and Munitions, Joint Ground Robotics Enterprise, Washington, DC, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • G.I. Peterson, Unmanned vehicles: Changing the way to look at the battlespace. Nav. Forces 26(4), 29–38 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • H.M. Roff, Responsibility, liability, and lethal autonomous robots, in Routledge Handbook of Ethics and War: Just War Theory in the 21st Century, ed. by F. Allhoff, N. G. Evans, A. Henschke, (Abingdon/New York, Routledge, 2013), pp. 352–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Australian Air Force, AAP 1003 – Operations Law for RAAF Commanders, 2nd edn. (Canberra, Air Power Development Centre, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Scarborough, Special report: unmanned warfare. Washington Times, 8 May 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • M.N. Schmitt, Precision attack and international humanitarian law. Int. Rev. Red Cross 87(859), 445–466 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Shachtman, Attack of the drones. Wired Magazine 13(6) (2005a). Available at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.06/drones_pr.htmal, 25 Aug 2005

  • N. Shachtman, Drone school, a ground’s-eye view. Wired Magazine, 27 May 2005b. Available at http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2005/05/67655, at 17 Sept 2007

  • J. Sherman, The drone wars. Bull. At. Sci. 61(5), 28–37 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.K. Shurtleff, The effects of technology on our humanity. Parameters: US Army War Coll. Q (Summer), 100–112 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • P.W. Singer, Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and 21st Century Conflict (The Penguin Press, New York, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparrow, Killer robots. J. Appl. Philos. 24(1), 62–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparrow, Predators or plowshares? Arms control of robotic weapons. IEEE Technol. Soc. 28(1), 25–29 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparrow, Robotic weapons and the future of war, in New Wars and New Soldiers: Military Ethics in the Contemporary World, ed. by J. Wolfendale, P. Tripodi, (Ashgate, Surrey/Burlington, 2011), pp. 117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparrow, ‘Just say no’ to drones. IEEE Technol. Soc. 31(1), 56–63 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparrow, War without virtue? in Killing by Remote Control, ed. by B. J. Strawser, (Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 84–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparrow, Twenty seconds to comply: Autonomous weapon systems and the recognition of surrender. Int. Law Stud. 91, 699–728 (2015a)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparrow, Martial and moral courage in tele-operated warfare: A commentary on Kirkpatrick. J. Mil. Ethics 14(3–4), 220–227 (2015b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparrow, Drones, courage, and military culture, in Routledge Handbook of Military Ethics, ed. by G. R. Lucas Jr., (Routledge, Oxford/New York, 2015c), pp. 380–394

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparrow, Robots and respect: Assessing the case against autonomous weapon systems. Ethics Int. Aff. 30(1), 93–116 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sparrow, G. Lucas Jr., When robots rule the waves? Naval War Coll. Rev. 69(4), 49–78 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • B.J. Strawser, Moral predators: The duty to employ uninhabited aerial vehicles. J. Mil. Ethics 9(4), 342–368 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Sullivan, Evolution or revolution? The rise of UAVs. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 25(3), 43–49 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Szafranski, The first rule of modern warfare: Never bring a knife to a gunfight. Air Space Power J 19(4), 19–26 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Thorton Jr., Captain, The case for robots in the SBCTs (now). Infantry 94(1), 33–41 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Ulin, When robots do the killing. Los Angeles Times, 30 Jan 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Veruggio, EURON Roboethics Roadmap (European Robotics Research Network, Genoa, 2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • G. Veruggio, F. Operto, Roboethics: Social and ethical implications of robotics, in Springer Handbook of Robotics, ed. by B. Siciliano, O. Khatib, (Springer, Berlin, 2006), pp. 1499–1524

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Wall, Reality check. Aviat. Week Space Technol. 165(5), 33 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Wise, No pilot, no problem. Pop. Mech. 184(4), 64 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research for this paper was supported by the Australian Research Council, through the award of an ARC Discovery Grant (DP0770545) to Dr Jessica Wolfendale, Professor Tony Coady, and Dr Robert Sparrow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    Robert Sparrow

Authors
  1. Robert Sparrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Sparrow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA

    Kimon P. Valavanis

  2. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    George J. Vachtsevanos

Section Editor information

  1. United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD, USA

    George R. Lucas Jr.

  2. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA

    George R. Lucas Jr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sparrow, R. (2021). Killer Robots: Ethical Issues in the Design of Unmanned Systems for Military Applications. In: Valavanis, K.P., Vachtsevanos, G.J. (eds) Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32193-6_98-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32193-6_98-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32193-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32193-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation