Skip to main content

Electricity Generator Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stopping Climate Change: the Case for Hydrogen and Coal

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 35))

  • 853 Accesses

Abstract

The capital costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from various types of electricity power plants will determine the least cost option for achieving our goal of reducing GHG emissions by at least 58 % below 1990 levels from the electricity generation sector (as a major part of our goal of reducing all GHG emissions by 80 % below 1990 levels by 2050). We show a plausible, economic scenario whereby replacing current fossil fuel based power generators with coal-powered integrated gasification combined cycle plants (IGCC) with carbon capture and storage (CCS) will achieve our GHG reduction targets by 2050.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Assuming a 95 % plant capacity factor and NGCC plants emitting 507 g of CO2-eq. per kWh of electricity (Table 4.2).

  2. 2.

    Higher heating value (HHV) efficiencies are used here since the utility fuels (coal and natural gas) are price in $/MBTU on a higher heating value basis.

  3. 3.

    The “2020” in WEIO-2020 refers to the year for cost estimates, not the year of publication.

  4. 4.

    The Power Capital Cost Index (PCCI) from 2001 to 2015 was a factor of 1.755.

  5. 5.

    As part of a plan to reduce all U.S. GHG emissions by 80 % below 1990 levels.

  6. 6.

    The other expenditures are for transmission and distribution of electricity.

  7. 7.

    Alternately, we could add CSS to the NGCC plants as discussed in the Sect. 4.7 below.

References

  1. Finkenrath M (2011) Cost and performance of Carbon Dioxide capture for power generation. International Energy Agency, Paris, France 2011. Available at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/cost-and-performance-of-carbon-dioxide-capture-from-power-generation_5kgggn8wk05l-en?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf

  2. Table 8.2 of the annual energy outlook-2015 by the Energy Information Agency of the U.S. Department of Energy. Available at https://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/assumptions/pdf/table_8.2.pdf

  3. Bedilion R Program on technology innovation: integrated generation technology options -2012. Electric Power Research Institute report 1026656, updated February 2013. Available at http://www.epri.com/abstracts/Pages/ProductAbstract.aspx?productId=000000000001026656

  4. World Energy Investment Outlook-2014. The International Energy Agency, Paris, France. Available at https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEIO2014.pdf

  5. Klara J (2007) Cost and performance base line for fossil energy plants. DOE/NETL-2007/1281, Rev 1 Aug 2007. Available at https://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Energy%20Analysis/Coal/BitBase_FinRep_2007.pdf

  6. The IHS Power Capital Cost Index (PCCI) for North America. Available at https://www.ihs.com/info/cera/ihsindexes/

  7. Wang M et al The greenhouse gases, regional emissions, and energy uses in transportation (GREET) Model, the Argonne National Laboratory. Available at https://greet.es.anl.gov/

  8. Overton T (2016) Kemper county IGCC costs rise and delays loom—again. Power Magazine, 5 Apr 2016. Available at http://www.powermag.com/kemper-county-igcc-costs-rise-and-delays-loom-again/

  9. Mufson S (2014) Intended showcase of clean-coal future hits snags. The Washington Post, 17 May 2014. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/intended-showcase-of-clean-coal-future-hits-snags/2014/05/16/fc03e326-cfd2-11e3-b812-0c92213941f4_story.html

  10. Rosenberg W IGCC Financing, Chapter 2. Belfer Center at Harvard University. Available at http://belfercenter.hks.harvard.edu/files/igcc%20financing%20chapter%202.pdf

  11. Borenstein S, Bushnell J The U.S. electricity industry after 20 years of restructuring, The Energy Institute at HAAS. Available at https://ei.haas.berkeley.edu/research/papers/WP252.pdf

  12. What is a wholesale electricity market? Electric Power Supply Association (EPSA). Available at https://www.epsa.org/industry/primer/?fa=wholesaleMarket

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. E. (Sandy) Thomas .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, C.E.(. (2017). Electricity Generator Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. In: Stopping Climate Change: the Case for Hydrogen and Coal. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31655-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31655-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31654-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31655-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics