Skip to main content

Women in Industrial Relations: Overcoming Gender Biases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Building Trust and Constructive Conflict Management in Organizations

Abstract

Although the promotion of equality is central to the mainstream field of industrial relations, employment relationships and human resource policies continue to be designed according to the male breadwinner ideal. In this chapter, we examine from a gender perspective some of the antecedents and implications of this phenomenon. We review evidence that many conditions of employment such as wages, job security, or access to power positions have particular negative effects for female employees. At the same time, we underscore the many economic and cultural transformations occurred in the labor market, society and work configurations, which bring new opportunities for women’s advancement in employment conditions. In relation to this, we identify strategies that might help women overcome current obstacles and gender biases, and highlight the role of (and benefits for) IR agents in such transformation toward gender equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(2), 151–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W., & Walster, E. (1974). Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectancies of equity and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(2), 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 421–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1090–1112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balliet, D., Li, N., Macfarlan, S. J., & Van Vugt, M. (2011). Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas. Psychological Bulletin, 137(6), 881–909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beechler, S., & Woodward, I. C. (2009). The global war for talent. Journal of International Management, 15(3), 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Befort, S. F., & Budd, J. W. (2007). Invisible hands, invisible objectives: Bringing workplace law and public policy into focus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benharda, I., Brett, J., & Lempereur, A. (2010). Gender and role in conflict management: Female and male managers as third parties. Paper presented at the 23rd annual international association of conflict management conference, Boston, MA, June 24–27, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, R. A., Bosco, S. M., & Columb, V. L. (2009). Does female representation on Boards of Directors associate with the ‘Most Ethical Companies’ list? Corporate Reputation Review, 25(3), 270–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, H., & Healey, G. (2008). Ethnicity and gender at work. Inequalities, careers and employment relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. P. (2010). The strategic use of demand-side diversity pressure in the solicitors profession. Journal of Law and Society, 37(3), 442–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briskin, L., & Muller, A. (2011). Promoting gender equality through social dialogue: Global trends and persistent obstacles (Working paper No. 34). ILO. Industrial and Employment Relations Department. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_172636.pdf

  • Broadbent, K. (2007). Sisters organizing in Japan and Korea: The development of women-only unions. Industrial Relations Journal, 38(3), 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J. W. (2004). Employment with a human face: Balancing efficiency, equity, and voice. Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J. W. (2008). A meta-paradigm for revitalizing industrial relations. In C. J. Whalen (Ed.), New directions in the study of work and employment. Revitalizing industrial relations as an academic enterprise (pp. 48–67). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cpseea06.htm

  • Carley, M. (2009). Trade union membership 2003–08. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Retrieved from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/docs/eiro/tn0904019s/tn0904019s.pdf

  • Carrell, M. R., & Dittrich, J. E. (1978). Equity theory: The recent literature, methodological considerations, and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 3(2), 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst. (2010). Why Diversity Matters. Catalyst Information Center. Retrieved from: http://www.pwi.be/Resources/Documents/Catalyst-Why_Diversity_Matters_11-2-10.pdf

  • De Cremer, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2002). How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 858–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Aringa, C. (2001). Wages and working time in the first report on industrial relations in Europe. In M. Biagi (Ed.), Towards a European model of industrial relations? Building on the first report of the European Commission (pp. 147–156). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desvaux, G., & Devillard, S. (2008). Women matter 2. Paris: McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from: http://www.mckinsey.com/locations/paris/home/womenmatter/pdfs/women_matter_oct2008_english.pdf

  • Dirks, K., & Ferrin, D. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K., & Ferrin, D. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation (1st ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., Karau, S., & Makhijani, M. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(1), 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Gartzia, L., & Carli, L. (2014). The female leadership advantage revisited. In S. Kumra, R. Simpson, & R. J. Burke (Eds.), Handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 153–174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (2003). The employment relationship. In P. Edwards (Ed.), Industrial relations: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 1–36). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgoibar, P., Munduate, L., Medina, F. J., & Euwema, M. C. (2011). Are employment relations in Europe based on trust? The employee representative perspective. Psychologica, 55, 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgoibar, P., Munduate, L., Medina, F., & Euwema, M. (2012). Trust: As essential as breathing. In L. Munduate, M. Euwema, & P. Elgoibar (Eds.), Ten steps for empowering employee representatives in the new European industrial relations (pp. 49–56). Madrid: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgoibar, P., Munduate, L., Medina, F., & Euwema, M. (2014). Do women accommodate more than men? Gender differences in perceived social support and negotiation behavior by Spanish and Dutch worker representatives. Sex Roles, 70, 538–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007). The challenge of mainstreaming for trade unions in Europe: How can trade unions foster gender equality in the work place and in daily life? Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/documents/documentlibrary/100124061EN6.pdf

  • European Commission. (2012). Women in economic decision-making in the EU: Progress report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Industrial relations in Europe 2012. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=9994&langId=en

  • European Trade Union Confederation; BUSINESSEUROPE/UEAPME; CEEP. (2009). Framework of actions on gender equality: Final evaluation report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=4253&langId=en

  • Eurostat. (2014) Gender statistics. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Gender_statistics

  • Eurostat. (2015a). Gender pay gap in unadjusted form. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tsdsc340

  • Eurostat. (2015b). Part-time employment as percentage of the total employment, by sex and age (%). Retrieved from: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do

  • Fletcher, J. K. (1995). Radically transforming work for the 21st century: A feminist reconstruction of “real” work. Academy of Management Journal, 1995(1), 448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, A. (1993). Women and industrial relations theory. Relations Industrielles, 48(3), 409–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, A. B., Pender, E., Elgoibar, P., Munduate, L., & Euwema, M. C. (2015). The tower of power: Building innovative organizations through social dialogue. In M. C. Euwema, L. Munduate, P. Elgoibar, E. Pender, & A. B. García (Eds.), Promoting social dialogue in European organizations human resources management and constructive conflict management (pp. 179–196). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartzia, L., Ryan, M., Balluerka, N., & Aritzeta, A. (2012). Think crisis – Think female: Further evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(4), 603–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartzia, L., & van Engen, M. (2012). Are (male) leaders “feminine” enough? Gender traits of identity as mediators of sex differences in leadership styles. Gender in Management, 27(5), 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartzia, L., & López-Zafra, E. (2014). Gender research in Spanish psychology: An overview for international readers. Sex Roles, 70(11–12), 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartzia, L., & López-Zafra, E. (2016). Gender research in Spanish psychology, Part II: Progress and complexities in the European context. Sex Roles, 73, 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartzia, L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2015). Too masculine, too bad: Effects of communion on leaders’ promotion of cooperation. Group & Organization Management, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C. (2006). Industrial relations in Western Europe. In M. J. Morley, P. Gunnigle, & D. G. Collings (Eds.), Global industrial relations (pp. 71–85). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosset, K. R. (2011). An examination of referent group identification and its effect on equity sensitivity levels among employees. Doctoral dissertation, Anderson University, Indiana. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/929298420

  • Gregory, A., & Milner, S. (2009). Trade unions and work-life balance: Changing times in France and the UK? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(1), 122–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselhuhna, M. P., Kennedyb, J. A., Krayc, L. J., Van Zantc, A. B., & Schweitzerd, M. E. (2015). Gender differences in trust dynamics: Women trust more than men following a trust violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Lucas, J. A. (1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2012). Gender equality and social dialogue: An annotated bibliography. Geneva: ILO. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/download/bibliogender.pdf

  • ILO. (2015a). Social dialogue. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/decent-work-agenda/social-dialogue/lang--en/index.htm

  • ILO. (2015b). ILOSTAT database. ILO, Department of Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/home/statisticaldata?_afrLoop=263197578296438#%40%3F_afrLoop%3D263197578296438%26_adf.ctrl-state%3D14v8cpp9nb_4

  • Jordaan, B., & Cillie, G. (2015). Building a collaborative workplace culture: A South African perspective. In P. Elgoibar, L. Munduate, & M. Euwema (Eds.), Building trust and constructive conflict management in organizations. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1998). Rethinking industrial relations. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. H., & Kim, D. O. (2012) Trust and employment relations: A workplace-level analysis. Paper presented to 16th ILERA World Congress, 2012. Retrieved from: http://ilera2012.wharton.upenn.edu/RefereedPapers/KimYoonHo%20DongOneKim.pdf

  • Kirton, G., & Healy, G.(2008). Women and trade union leadership: Overview of UK context. Retrieved from: http://hosted.busman.qmul.ac.uk/wtul/Publications%20and%20Resources/16981.html

  • Kirton, G., & Greene, A. M. (2005). Gender, equality and industrial relations in the ‘New Europe’: An introduction. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 11(2), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. A. (2008). Conclusion: The future of industrial relations, a.k.a. work and employment relations. In C. J. Whalen (Ed.), New directions in the study of work and employment. Revitalizing industrial relations as an academic enterprise (pp. 225–236). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 60–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. (Eds.). (1996). Trust in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, M. B., Bernardi, R. A., & Bosco, S. M. (2012). Board gender diversity, corporate reputation and market performance. The International Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latu, I. M., Schmid, M. M., Lammers, J., & Bombari, D. (2013). Successful female leaders empower women’s behavior in leadership tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 444–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liff, S. (2003). The industrial relations of a diverse workforce. In P. Edwards (Ed.), Industrial relations: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 420–446). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L. L., Ameratunga, S., & Whelton, C. (2002). Promoting gender equality: A resource kit for trade unions. Geneva: ILO. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/gems/download/6booklet.pdf

  • Metz, I., & Kulik, C. (2014). The Rocky Climb: Women’s advancement in management. In S. Kumra, R. Simpson, & R. J. Burke (Eds.), Handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 175–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward, N., Bryson, A., & Forth, J. (2000). All change at work? British employment relations 1980–1998, as portrayed by the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey series. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Indicators of Gender Equality in Employment. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/gender/data/employment.htm

  • Olney, S., Goodson, E., Maloba-Caines, K., & O’Neill, F. (2002). Gender equality: A guide to collective bargaining. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J., & Foley, J. (2010). Progress on women’s equality within UK and Canadian trade unions: Do women’s structures make a difference? Relations Industrielles, 65(2), 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pissarides, C., Garibaldi, P., Olivetti, C., Petrongolo, B., & Wasmer, E. (2003) Women in the labour force: how well is Europe doing? Unpublished. Retrieved from: http://people.bu.edu/olivetti/papers/women.pdf

  • Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2006). The gender pay gap—origins and policy responses. A comparative review of 30. European countries. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=2007&langId=en

  • Pritchard, R. D., Dunnette, M. D., & Gorgenson, D. O. (1972). Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2014). Essentials of organizational behavior (Twelfth edn). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streets, S., & Major, D. (2014). Gender and careers: Obstacles and opportunities. In S. Kumra, R. Simpson, & R. J. Burke (Eds.), Handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 293–312). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, J., Matus, M., Calderón, F., & Gómez, A. (2008). Sesgo de género en la negociación colectiva de medidas de conciliación. El caso andaluz. [Gender bias in collective bargaining of work–life balance measures. The Andalusian case]. Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, 71, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Emmerik, H., Wendt, H., & Euwema, M. (2010). Gender ratio, societal culture, and male and female leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 895–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, J. (2011). European works councils: A transnational industrial relations institution in the making. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2000). Feminism facing industrial relations in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(2), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 698–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leire Gartzia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gartzia, L., Amillano, A., Baniandrés, J. (2016). Women in Industrial Relations: Overcoming Gender Biases. In: Elgoibar, P., Euwema, M., Munduate, L. (eds) Building Trust and Constructive Conflict Management in Organizations. Industrial Relations & Conflict Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31475-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics