Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Insurance Companies’ Investment Policy on Risk Management in the Public Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risk Management in Public Administration

  • 1107 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to identify the areas where insurance companies’ investment policies influence risk management in the public sector and financial system stability in the European Union countries and to analyse the model of their investment portfolio allocation. The significance of the insurance sector for the public one is examined in the context of the so-called critical functions: (1) fulfilment of the function of insurance coverage; and (2) the mechanisms of long-term allocation of capital. The importance of insurance institutions both for the stability of the public sector and the whole economic system arises from the fact that these institutions perform the critical—from the perspective of society as well as the economy—function of insurance coverage which allows the management of risk and ensures continuity of operation. The capability of ensuring infallible fulfilment of insurance coverage constitutes a synthetic indicator of the stability of the socio-economic system. Performance of the functions of critical importance for the stability of the public sector by the insurance sector is also concerned with the mechanism of long-term allocation of capital, especially in the case of life insurance companies, which is invested in the financial market and in the real economy. The investment activities of insurance companies have an impact on the stability of the public sector, in particular: (1) by investing in instruments issued by the government, which is of particular systemic importance in the context of debt crisis in many EU member states; (2) by influencing the situation on the stock and bond markets, e.g. creating speculative bubbles, assets fire sale; (3) by transforming capital into investment in the real economy sector—an effect on the real economy through over-rating some sectors at the expense of others, thus determining the cost of capital. Activity of insurance companies on the market of public debt is of immense importance for risk management in the public sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Al-Darwish, A., Hafeman, M., Impavido, G., Kemp, M., & O’Malley, P. (2011). Possible unintended consequences of Basel III and Solvency II. IMF working paper (WP/11/187), IMF Working Paper. http://www.truesaleinternational.de/fileadmin/tsi_downloads/ABS_Research/Finanzmarktstabilisierung/imf_wp201108_Monetary_and_Capital_Markets_Department.pdf

  • Allen, F., & Santomero, A. M. (1998). The theory of financial intermediation, “Journal of Banking & Finance” nr 21 1461-1485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W., & Wood, G. (2006). Defining and achieving financial stability. Journal of Financial Stability, 2, 152–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artikis, T., & Voudouri, A. (2000). A stochastic integral arising in discounting continuous cash flows and certain transformed characteristic functions. Applied Mathematical Letters, 13, 87–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, D. (1999). Portfolio choice models of pension funds and life assurance companies, similarities and differences. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 24, 327–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockett, P. L., Cooper, W. W., Golden, L. L., Rousseau, J. J., & Wang, Y. (2005). Financial intermediary versus production approach to efficiency of marketing distribution systems and organizational structure of insurance companies. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 72(3), 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaim, R. M. (2010). Dynamic asset and liability management. In M. Micocci, G. N. Gregoriou, & G. B. Masala (Eds.), Pension fund risk management: Financial and actuarial modeling. New York: CRC Press/Chapman& Hall Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charupat, N., & Milevsky, M. A. (2002). Optimal asset allocation in life annuities: A note. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 30, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., & Wong, K. A. (2004). The determinants of financial health of Asian insurance companies. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 71(3), 469–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 of 10 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II). (2015). Official Journal of the European Union L 12, Vol. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, A. (1997). Theory and practice of financial stability. Essays in International Finance, No. 203, 60 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, A. (2000). Marrying the micro- and macro-prudential dimensions of financial stability. Speech in Basel before the 11th International Conference of Banking Supervisors. http://www.bis.org/speeches/sp000921.htm. Accessed 26 June 2015.

  • Cummins, J. D., & Weiss, M. (1993). Measuring cost efficiency in the property – Liability insurance industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. D., Grace, M. F., & Philips, R. D. (1999). Regulatory solvency prediction in property-liability insurance: Risk-based capital, audit ratios, and cash flow simulation. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 66, 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerwińska, T. (2014). Credit risk of insurance companies investment portfolio in the light of Solvency II requirements. Journal of Management and Finance, 12(1), 12–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. (2001a). A typology of financial instability, OesterreichischeNationalbank. Financial Stability Report, 2, 92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. P. (2001b). Portfolio regulation of life insurance companies and pension funds. London: The Pensions Institute, Discussion paper PI-0101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daykin, C. D., & Hey, G. B. (1990). Managing uncertainty in a general insurance company. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 117, 173–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, G. (2000). The implications of lower interest rates for insurers: A comment. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues & Practice, 25(1), 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II). (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, N. A., & Kang, H. B. (1988). Interest rates and insurance price cycles. Journal of Banking and Finance, 62, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eling, M., & Pankoke, D. (2014). Systemic risk in the insurance sector – What do we know? Working papers on risk management and insurance, No. 124, Ed. H. Schmeiser, University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E. J., & Gruber, M. J. (1992). Optimal investment strategies with investor liabilities. Journal of Banking and Finance, 16, 869–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, J. H. (2013). Cross industry analysis 28 G-SIBs vs. 28 Insurers – Comparison of systemic risk indicators. The Geneva Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Shadow Banking Monitoring Report. (2013). Financial Stability Board, Basel. http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_121118c.htm

  • Halliwell, L. J. (2003). The valuation of stochastic cash flows. CAS Forum, pp. 1–68. www.casact.org/pubs/forum/03spforum/03spf001.pdf

  • Hancock, J., Huber, P., & Koch, P. (2001). Value creation in the insurance industry. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 4(2), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, W. H., & Rowland, D. D. (2006). An investment management methodology for publicly held property/casualty insurers. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 18(1), 36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilli, P., Koivu, M., & Pennanen, T. (2011). Cash-flow based valuation of pension liabilities. European Actuarial Journal, 1, 329–343. doi:10.1007/s13385-011-0023-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, C., & Plum, M. (2000). Optimal investment for insurers. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 27, 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodes, D. M., Neghaiwi, T., Cummins, J. D., Phillips, R., Sh. Feldblum, & The Financial Modeling of Property/Casualty Insurance Companies. 2003. https://www.casact.org/pubs/forum/96spforum/96spf003.pdf

  • Houben, A., Kakes, J., Schinasi, G. (2004). Toward a framework for safeguarding financial stability. IMF working papers (WP/04/101). International Capital Markets Department IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance and Financial Stability. (2011). IAIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance companies: bridging low interest rates and higher capital requirements, w: Financial Stability Review. (2013). Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt am Main. http://www.bundesbank.de

  • Insurance in 2015 – Determining the Position. 2015. New coordinates in the German-speaking insurance market. Institute of Insurance Economics, University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josa-Fombellida, R., & Rincon-Zapatero, J. P. (2006). Optimal investment decisions with a liability: The case of defined benefit pension plans. Insurance Mathematics and Economics, 39, 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Ch, S., & Yang, H. (2004). Optimal investment for an insurer to minimize its probability of ruin. North American Actuarial Journal, 8(2), 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. S. (1999). Global financial instability: framework, events, issues. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F.S. (2012). The economics of money, banking and financial markets, Global Edition. PEARSON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J., & Sandmann, K. (1995). Equity-linked life insurance: A model with stochastic interest rates. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 16, 225–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissim, D. (2010). Analysis and valuation of insurance companies, Columbia Business School Center for excellence in accounting & security analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennanen, T. (2011). Superhedging in illiquid markets. Math Finance, 21(3), 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recovery and Resolution Planning for Systemically Important Insurers. (2014). Guidance on identification of critical functions and critical shared services, FSB, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risk Centre. (2014). The London School of Economics and Political Science, SRC special paper nr 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. (2011). European insurance: Government crisis potentially leading to further dilution of Solvency II principles. J.P. Morgan Europe Equity Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santomero, A. M., & Babbel, D. F. (1997). Financial risk management by insurers: An analysis of the process. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 62, 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinasi, G. (2004). Defining financial stability. IMF working paper no. WP/04/187. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2004/wp04187.pdf

  • Schmidli, H. (2005). On optimal investment and subexponential claims. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 36, 399–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. S., & Shin, K. (2011). Macroprudential policy and monetary aggregates. NBER Working Paper No. 16836. Paper prepared for the 2010 Bank of Korea Research Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiu, Y. (2004). Determinants of United Kingdom General insurance company performance. British Actuarial Journal, 10(5), 1079–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg, F., Manca, R., & Silvestrov, D. (2006). Semi-Markov reward models for insurance. Theory of Stochastic Processes, 12, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Systemic Risk in Insurance. (2010). An analysis of insurance and financial stability. Geneva: The Geneva Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Impact of the Financial Crisis On The Insurance Sector And Policy Responses, OECD. (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimann, Ch. (2014). How insurers differ from banks: A primer on systemic regulation. Systemic Risk Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science. SRC special paper no. 3. http://www.systemicrisk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/publications/sp-3_1.pdf

  • Tobin, J. (1958). Liquidity preference as behavior toward risk. Review of Economic Studies, 25(2), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, M. B. (2004). Liability – Relative investing. Be dual duration – Matched and on the surplus efficient frontier. The Journal of Portfolio Management, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. A. (2010). Systemic risk and the U.S. insurance sector. Working paper, National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, G. N. F., & Muhlnickel, J. (2014). Why do some insurers become systemically relevant? Journal of Financial Stability, 13, 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, A. D. (1986). A stochastic investment model for actuarial use. Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries, 39, 391–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., & Zhang, L. (2005). Optimal investment for insurer with jump-diffusion risk process. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 37, 1066–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemba, W. T., & Mulvey, J. M. (1998). Worldwide asset and liability modeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

    Teresa Czerwińska

Authors
  1. Teresa Czerwińska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland

    Konrad Raczkowski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Czerwińska, T. (2017). Impact of Insurance Companies’ Investment Policy on Risk Management in the Public Sector. In: Raczkowski, K. (eds) Risk Management in Public Administration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30877-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30877-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30876-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30877-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation