Skip to main content

Development and Validation of Molecular Testing on Cytologic Specimens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Molecular Cytopathology

Part of the book series: Essentials in Cytopathology ((EICP,volume 26))

  • 945 Accesses

Abstract

Molecular genetic analyses have been increasingly performed on cytologic specimens to facilitate management of cancer patients. Before developing and validating a molecular assay for clinical utility, it is important to evaluate if the assay will significantly change the patient management, e.g., its impacts in diagnosis, risk assessment, prognosis and prediction of therapeutic response. Gene fusions or rearrangements associated with chromosome translocations in neoplasm, mostly in lymphomas and soft tissue tumors, are useful biomarkers for purpose of diagnosis owing to their higher frequency and specificity. For example, detections of gene fusions of BCR-ABL1 and EWS-FLI1 have been used for diagnosis and minimal disease monitoring of CML and diagnosis for Ewing’s tumor, respectively. Genetic alterations in epithelial or neuroepithelial neoplasms, mostly point mutation, insertion/deletion and amplification, are usually not applied for purpose of diagnosis due to their lower frequency (<50 %) and lack of organ/tissue specificity, but they are successfully applied for prediction to therapeutic response and prognosis. For example, N-myc gene amplification and 1p/19q deletions have been used for prognosis/risk assessment of neuroblastoma and oligodendroglioma respectively, and EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF mutations for prediction of response to biomarker-driven (targeted) therapies for lung adenocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma and melanoma respectively. Selection and decision of a molecular assay may be affected by the many factors, such as official clinical guidelines for patient management including CAP and NCCA guidelines, availability of FDA-approved companion molecular assays for targeted therapy, requests by clinicians for a specific gene or disease, and reimbursable molecular-based assays by insurance company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  • Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2091–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American College of Medical Genetics. Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories 2006 edition. https://www.acmg.net/pages/acmg_activities/stds-2002/g.htm.

  • Association for Molecular Pathology Clinical Practice Committee. Molecular diagnostic assay validation. Oct 2009. http://www.amp.org/publications _resources/assay_development/AssayValidation_Final.pdf.

  • Association for Molecular Pathology Statement. Recommendations for inhouse development and operation of molecular diagnostic tests. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;111:449–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernacki KD, Betz BL, Weigelin HC, et al. Molecular diagnostics of melanoma fine-needle aspirates. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;138:670–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava R, Oppenheimer O, Gerald W, et al. Identification of MYCN gene amplification in neuroblastoma using chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH): an alternative and practical method. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2005;14(2):72–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2507–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen BC, Richards CS, Wilson JA, et al. Quality assurance and quality improvement in U.S. clinical molecular genetic laboratories. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2011;Chapter 9:Unit 9.2. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0902s69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halling KC, Schrijver I, Persons DL. Test verification and validation for molecular diagnostic assays. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:11–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings L, Van Deerlin VM, Gulley ML. Recommended principles and practices for validating clinical molecular pathology tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:743–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jurinke C, Oeth P, van den Boom D. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: a versatile tool for high-performance DNA analysis. Mol Biotechnol. 2004;26:147–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy S. Applications of molecular techniques to fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer. 2007;111:106–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kristiasen G. Manual microdissection. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;576:31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang SL, Lin MT, Hafez MJ, et al. Application of traditional clinical pathology quality control techniques to molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2008;10:142–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mattocks CJ, Morris MA, Matthijs G, et al. A standardized framework for the validation and verification of clinical molecular genetic tests. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:1276–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra S, de la Roza G, Tull J, et al. Detection of FOXO1(FKHR) gene break-apart by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in formalin fixed paraffin embedded alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas and its clinicopathological correlation. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2008;17:14–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oncology Molecular Validation Criteria. http://www.wadsworth.org/labcert/TestApproval/forms/Oncology_Molecular_Checklist.pdf.

  • Pont-Kingdon G, Gedge F, Wooderchak-Donahue W, et al. Design and analytical validation of clinical DNA sequencing assays. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:41–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard CC, Salipante SJ, Koehler K. Validation and implementation of targeted capture and sequencing for the detection of actionable mutation, copy number variation, and gene rearrangement in clinical cancer specimens. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16:56–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh R, Singh RR, Patel KP, et al. Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing screen for mutational hotspots in 46 cancer-related genes. J Mol Diagn. 2013;15:607–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehm HL, Bale SJ, Bayrak-Toydemir P, et al. ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing. Genet Med advance online publication. 25 July 2013. http://pathology.ucla.edu/workfiles/News/ACMG-NGS-Guidelines-2013.pdf.

  • Sakairi Y, Sato K, Itoga S, et al. Transbronchial biopsy needle rinse solution used for comprehensive biomarker testing in patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:26–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scicchitano MS, Dalmas DA, Bertiaux MA, et al. Preliminary comparison of quantity, quality, and microarray performance of RNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, and unfixed frozen tissue samples. J Histochem Cytochem. 2006;54(11):1229–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staaf J, Borg A. Zoom-in array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to detect germline rearrangements in cancer susceptibility genes. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;653:221–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taron M, Ichinose Y, Rosell R, et al. Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with improved survival in Gefitinib-treated chemorefractory lung adenocarcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5878–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RK, Baker AC, DeBiasi RM, et al. High-throughput oncogene mutation profiling in human cancer. Nat Genet. 2007;39:347–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham CL, Boyce M, Joyner MV, et al. Amplification of PCR products in excess of 600 base pairs using DNA extracted from decalcified, paraffin wax embedded bone marrow trephine biopsies. Mol Pathol. 2000;53:19–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Young G, Wang K, He J, et al. Generation sequencing successfully applied to fine-needle aspirations of pulmonary and pancreatic neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:688–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S. Transcriptome analysis (chapter 8). In: Tang DF, Lynch HT, editors. Molecular diagnostics and personalized cancer medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. p. 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Tan D. Introduction to molecular techniques and instrumentation (chapter 7). In: Tang DF, Lynch HT, editors. Molecular diagnostics and personalized cancer medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. p. 70–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo Z, Chen SS, Chandra PK, et al. Application of COLD-PCR for improved detection of KRAS mutations in clinical samples. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:1023–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengle Zhang M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhang, S., Yang, B. (2016). Development and Validation of Molecular Testing on Cytologic Specimens. In: Yang, B., Rao, J. (eds) Molecular Cytopathology. Essentials in Cytopathology, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30741-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30741-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30739-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30741-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics