Abstract
Molecular genetic analyses have been increasingly performed on cytologic specimens to facilitate management of cancer patients. Before developing and validating a molecular assay for clinical utility, it is important to evaluate if the assay will significantly change the patient management, e.g., its impacts in diagnosis, risk assessment, prognosis and prediction of therapeutic response. Gene fusions or rearrangements associated with chromosome translocations in neoplasm, mostly in lymphomas and soft tissue tumors, are useful biomarkers for purpose of diagnosis owing to their higher frequency and specificity. For example, detections of gene fusions of BCR-ABL1 and EWS-FLI1 have been used for diagnosis and minimal disease monitoring of CML and diagnosis for Ewing’s tumor, respectively. Genetic alterations in epithelial or neuroepithelial neoplasms, mostly point mutation, insertion/deletion and amplification, are usually not applied for purpose of diagnosis due to their lower frequency (<50 %) and lack of organ/tissue specificity, but they are successfully applied for prediction to therapeutic response and prognosis. For example, N-myc gene amplification and 1p/19q deletions have been used for prognosis/risk assessment of neuroblastoma and oligodendroglioma respectively, and EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF mutations for prediction of response to biomarker-driven (targeted) therapies for lung adenocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma and melanoma respectively. Selection and decision of a molecular assay may be affected by the many factors, such as official clinical guidelines for patient management including CAP and NCCA guidelines, availability of FDA-approved companion molecular assays for targeted therapy, requests by clinicians for a specific gene or disease, and reimbursable molecular-based assays by insurance company.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Suggested Reading
Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2091–6.
American College of Medical Genetics. Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories 2006 edition. https://www.acmg.net/pages/acmg_activities/stds-2002/g.htm.
Association for Molecular Pathology Clinical Practice Committee. Molecular diagnostic assay validation. Oct 2009. http://www.amp.org/publications _resources/assay_development/AssayValidation_Final.pdf.
Association for Molecular Pathology Statement. Recommendations for inhouse development and operation of molecular diagnostic tests. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;111:449–63.
Bernacki KD, Betz BL, Weigelin HC, et al. Molecular diagnostics of melanoma fine-needle aspirates. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;138:670–7.
Bhargava R, Oppenheimer O, Gerald W, et al. Identification of MYCN gene amplification in neuroblastoma using chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH): an alternative and practical method. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2005;14(2):72–6.
Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2507–16.
Chen BC, Richards CS, Wilson JA, et al. Quality assurance and quality improvement in U.S. clinical molecular genetic laboratories. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2011;Chapter 9:Unit 9.2. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0902s69.
Halling KC, Schrijver I, Persons DL. Test verification and validation for molecular diagnostic assays. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:11–3.
Jennings L, Van Deerlin VM, Gulley ML. Recommended principles and practices for validating clinical molecular pathology tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:743–55.
Jurinke C, Oeth P, van den Boom D. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: a versatile tool for high-performance DNA analysis. Mol Biotechnol. 2004;26:147–63.
Krishnamurthy S. Applications of molecular techniques to fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer. 2007;111:106–22.
Kristiasen G. Manual microdissection. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;576:31–8.
Liang SL, Lin MT, Hafez MJ, et al. Application of traditional clinical pathology quality control techniques to molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2008;10:142–6.
Mattocks CJ, Morris MA, Matthijs G, et al. A standardized framework for the validation and verification of clinical molecular genetic tests. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:1276–88.
Mehra S, de la Roza G, Tull J, et al. Detection of FOXO1(FKHR) gene break-apart by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in formalin fixed paraffin embedded alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas and its clinicopathological correlation. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2008;17:14–20.
Oncology Molecular Validation Criteria. http://www.wadsworth.org/labcert/TestApproval/forms/Oncology_Molecular_Checklist.pdf.
Pont-Kingdon G, Gedge F, Wooderchak-Donahue W, et al. Design and analytical validation of clinical DNA sequencing assays. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:41–6.
Pritchard CC, Salipante SJ, Koehler K. Validation and implementation of targeted capture and sequencing for the detection of actionable mutation, copy number variation, and gene rearrangement in clinical cancer specimens. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16:56–67.
Rajesh R, Singh RR, Patel KP, et al. Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing screen for mutational hotspots in 46 cancer-related genes. J Mol Diagn. 2013;15:607–22.
Rehm HL, Bale SJ, Bayrak-Toydemir P, et al. ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing. Genet Med advance online publication. 25 July 2013. http://pathology.ucla.edu/workfiles/News/ACMG-NGS-Guidelines-2013.pdf.
Sakairi Y, Sato K, Itoga S, et al. Transbronchial biopsy needle rinse solution used for comprehensive biomarker testing in patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:26–32.
Scicchitano MS, Dalmas DA, Bertiaux MA, et al. Preliminary comparison of quantity, quality, and microarray performance of RNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, and unfixed frozen tissue samples. J Histochem Cytochem. 2006;54(11):1229–37.
Staaf J, Borg A. Zoom-in array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to detect germline rearrangements in cancer susceptibility genes. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;653:221–35.
Taron M, Ichinose Y, Rosell R, et al. Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with improved survival in Gefitinib-treated chemorefractory lung adenocarcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5878–85.
Thomas RK, Baker AC, DeBiasi RM, et al. High-throughput oncogene mutation profiling in human cancer. Nat Genet. 2007;39:347–51.
Wickham CL, Boyce M, Joyner MV, et al. Amplification of PCR products in excess of 600 base pairs using DNA extracted from decalcified, paraffin wax embedded bone marrow trephine biopsies. Mol Pathol. 2000;53:19–23.
Young G, Wang K, He J, et al. Generation sequencing successfully applied to fine-needle aspirations of pulmonary and pancreatic neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:688–94.
Zhang S. Transcriptome analysis (chapter 8). In: Tang DF, Lynch HT, editors. Molecular diagnostics and personalized cancer medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. p. 86–95.
Zhang S, Tan D. Introduction to molecular techniques and instrumentation (chapter 7). In: Tang DF, Lynch HT, editors. Molecular diagnostics and personalized cancer medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. p. 70–85.
Zuo Z, Chen SS, Chandra PK, et al. Application of COLD-PCR for improved detection of KRAS mutations in clinical samples. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:1023–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, S., Yang, B. (2016). Development and Validation of Molecular Testing on Cytologic Specimens. In: Yang, B., Rao, J. (eds) Molecular Cytopathology. Essentials in Cytopathology, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30741-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30741-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30739-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30741-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)