Skip to main content

DoNA—A Domain-Based Negotiation Agent

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 638))

  • 767 Accesses

Abstract

Negotiation is an important skill when interacting actors might have misaligned interests. In order to support automated negotiators research the Automated Negotiation Agent Competition (ANAC) was founded to evaluate automated agents in a bilateral negotiation setting across multiple domains. An analysis of various agents’ strategies from past competitions show that most of them used an explicit opponent modeling component. While it is well known that in repeated interactions, learning the opponent and developing reciprocity become of prominent importance to achieve one’s goal, when the interactions with the same partner are not repeated, focusing on complex opponent modeling might not be the right approach. With that in mind, we explore a domain-based approach in which we form strategies based solely on two domain parameters: the reservation value and the discount factor. Following the presentation of our cognitive model, we present DoNA, a Domain-based Negotiation Agent that exemplifies our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ii.tudelft.nl/negotiation/index.php/Automated_Negotiating_Agents_Competition_(ANAC).

  2. 2.

    Admittedly, we present what we refer to as satisfactory—rather than optimal—parameter values in the sense that the values we used preform well enough, however, we are currently developing the theoretical foundation to calculate optimal parameter values.

  3. 3.

    Competition website: http://www.itolab.nitech.ac.jp/ANAC2014/.

References

  1. Axelrod, R.M.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Byde, A., Yearworth, M., Chen, K.Y., Bartolini, C.: Aut ONA: A system for automated multiple 1–1 negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Electronic Commerce (CEC), pp. 59–67 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, K.L., Zuckerman, I., Nau, D.S., Golbeck, J.: The life game: cognitive strategies for repeated stochastic games. In: SocialCom/PASSAT, pp. 95–102. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jonker, C.M., Robu, V., Treur, J.: An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 15(2), 221–252 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalai, E., Smorodinsky, M.: Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43, 513–518 (1975). http://jmvidal.cse.sc.edu/library/kalai75a.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lai, G., Li, C., Sycara, K., Giampapa, J.: Literature review on multi-attribute negotiations. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lai, G., Sycara, K.: A generic framework for automated multi-attribute negotiation. Group Decis. Negotiat. 18(2), 169–187 (2009). doi:10.1007/s10726-008-9119-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9119-9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., Barry, J.: Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. Artif. Intell. 172(6–7), 823–851 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Nash, J.: The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2), 155–162 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter—Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sim, K.M.: A survey of bargaining models for grid resource allocation. SIGecom Exch. 5(5), 22–32 (2006). doi:10.1145/1124566.1124570, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124566.1124570

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zuckerman, I., Rosenfeld, A., Kraus, S., Segal-Halevi, E.: Towards automated negotiation agents that use chat interfaces. In: The Sixth International Workshop on Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiations. Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eden Shalom Erez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erez, E.S., Zuckerman, I. (2016). DoNA—A Domain-Based Negotiation Agent. In: Fukuta, N., Ito, T., Zhang, M., Fujita, K., Robu, V. (eds) Recent Advances in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 638. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30307-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30307-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30305-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30307-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics