Skip to main content

Ignore, Avoid, Abandon, and Embrace: What Drives Firm Responses to Environmental Regulation?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Supply Chain Management ((SSSCM,volume 3))

Abstract

A regulator’s ability to incentivize environmental improvement among firms is a vital lever in achieving long-term sustainability. However, firms can and do respond to environmental regulation in a variety of ways: complying with its intent; avoiding the regulation by offshoring or by abandoning the market; or ignoring the regulation by continuing with entrenched business practices. The path a profit-maximizing firm will choose depends, in part, on the expected cost of noncompliance, which is a product of the regulator’s stated penalty, the likelihood that noncompliant practices are detected, and the likelihood that detected violations are punished. The form of regulatory regime and three important cost thresholds also drive firm response. In this chapter, through examples of regulatory failures and successes, we develop a framework for understanding how these thresholds interact with the type of regulatory regime being considered and the expected cost of noncompliance to determine whether profit-maximizing firms ignore, avoid, or embrace environmental regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The carbon cost per ton of cement in Fig. 12.4 assumes a cost of 25 per ton of CO2, roughly in line with Point Carbon’s projected average cost of 23 per ton for 2020–2030 (Thomson Reuters 2014).

  2. 2.

    Penalties can result from administrative, civil, or criminal actions (Stafford 2002).

  3. 3.

    While multiple companies are being held liable for the accident and spill to different degrees, the burden is mostly BP’s. Federal judge Carl Barbier recently ruled that BP is 67 % responsible, Transocean 30 %, and Halliburton 3 % (United States of America v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. 2014).

  4. 4.

    Based on the authors’ personal experience and the Ground Water Quality Bureau’s organizational chart (New Mexico Environment Department, Ground Water Quality Bureau 2014).

  5. 5.

    The US ambient air standards for lead became even more restrictive in 2008, which to led a surge in lead battery exports (Lloyd 2012).

  6. 6.

    If a reduction of SO2 emissions does not arise when the cap is lowered, then the allowance price increases through standard demand and supply economics. As the cap is reduced further, this results in a cost trade-off that eventually favors improved abatement effort.

  7. 7.

    This section draws from logic developed in Drake (2015).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David F. Drake .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drake, D.F., Just, R.L. (2016). Ignore, Avoid, Abandon, and Embrace: What Drives Firm Responses to Environmental Regulation?. In: Atasu, A. (eds) Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30094-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics