Skip to main content

Country Reputation, Brand Reputation and Company Reputation: Their Importance in Business-to-Business Industries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Rediscovering the Essentiality of Marketing

Abstract

Literature and research studies on country of origin (COO) have mainly focused on its effect in business to consumer (B2C) markets. Among the few scholars who have analysed industrial sectors (B2B), some believe that COO has similar importance and the same function in B2B markets as in B2C markets. In contrast, others argue that industrial customers are less influenced by this phenomenon. To contribute to this debate, we selected a group of Italian companies in different industries operating in at least one foreign market. We administered electronic questionnaires, collecting data and information on the internationalization of these enterprises, the COO effect and its relevance, namely, the elements that most influence the COO effect. The data also enabled us to examine the importance of company and brand reputation in the internationalization of B2B industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The companies were selected from the member lists of the following associations: (Food) Federalimentare—Federation of the Italian food industry, UnionAlimentari—National Union of small and medium food companies; (Furniture-Wood) FederLegnoArredo—Federation of furniture and furnishing companies; (Chemical) Federchimica—National Federation of the chemical industry; (Electronic) ANIE—National Federation of electrotechnical and electronics companies; (Mechanical) Federmeccanica—Italian Federation of metalworking industries, AMMA—Association of mechanical and mechatronic companies; (Plastic) Federazione Gomma e Plastica—Rubber and Plastics Federation, Polimerica—Italian Institute of packaging; (Textile-clothing) ASSOMAC—National Association of Italian manufacturers of footwear, leather goods and tannery Machines and accessories, Sistema Moda Italia—textiles and fashion Federation, Uniontessile—National Union of small and medium private industrial companies.

  2. 2.

    The mailings started in December 2013 and the recalls are still in progress.

  3. 3.

    The degree of association was evaluated by calculating the Pearson Ƙ 2 index, the Cramer’s V and Phi normalized index values. The values obtained were subjected to appropriate tests to identify their actual significance.

  4. 4.

    A preliminary analysis was conducted aimed at highlighting the eventual presence of outliers that could adversely affect the construction of groups by the software used (SPSS). The negative outcome of this analysis, suitably tested, allowed using all available information at the same time without excluding company cases that, on the contrary, would have suggested associating specific clusters to those obtained through processing the resulting subset data.

    The clustering produced substantially overlapping results, both in the use of a k-means-type algorithm, which subdivides the statistical units (in our case companies) into disjoint subsets such that each cluster is associated with a centroid and each firm is assigned to the cluster whose centroid is nearest, and to one hierarchical type, which instead organizes the units on a tree diagram (dendrogram) constructed on the basis of a matrix of distances between the objects according to a chosen metric (in our case the Euclidean distance). The tests conducted on the complete matrix of information enabled verifying that all the variables included as input to the clustering were significant within the aggregation process.

References

  • Bradley, F. (2001). Country-company interaction effects and supplier preferences among industrial buyers. Industrial Marketing Management, 30, 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursi, T., Grappi, S., & Martinelli, E. (2012). Effetto country of origin. Un’analisi comparata a livello internazionale sul comportamento d’acquisto. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedrola, E., & Battaglia, L. (2012a). Italian country image: The impact on business models and relations in Chinese business-to-business markets. In G. Bertoli & R. Resciniti (Eds.), International marketing and the country of origin effect. The global impact of ‘Made in Italy’ (pp. 81–107). Northampton, MA: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedrola, E., & Battaglia, L. (2012b). Storia economia, cultura, modelli di business e di marketing per operare con successo in Cina: La via verso la Terra di Mezzo. Padua: Cedam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedrola, E., & Battaglia, L. (2013). Country-of-origin effect and firm reputation influence in business-to-business markets with high cultural distance. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasin, J. B., & Jaffe, E. D. (1987). Industrial buyer attitudes towards goods made in Eastern Europe. European Management Journal, 5(3), 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiocca, R., Snehota, I., & Tunisini, A. (2008). Marketing business-to-business. Milan: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerini, C., & Uslenghi, A. (2006). Valore del Made in, identità di marca e comunicazione di marketing nelle imprese distrettuali italiane. Liuc Papers 190: Serie Economia Aziendale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, C. M. (1989, May). Country image: Halo or summary construct? Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 222–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainolfi, G. (2010). Il modello della country reputation: Evidenze empiriche e implicazioni strategiche per le imprese del Made in Italy nel mercato cinese. Tourin: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebenzahl, I. D., Jaffé, E. D., & Usunier, J. C. (2003). Personifying country-of-origin research. Management International Review, 43(4), 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, A. (1997). Consumer knowledge and country of origin effects. European Journal of Marketing, 31(1), 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verlegh, P. W. J., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country of origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, P. D. (1979). Attitudes of U.S. purchasing managers toward industrial products manufactured in selected Western European nations. Journal of International Business Studies, 10(1), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, P. D., & Cundiff, E. W. (1978). Assessing the quality of industrial products. Journal of Marketing, 42, 80–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Cedrola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cedrola, E., Battaglia, L., Quaranta, A.G. (2016). Country Reputation, Brand Reputation and Company Reputation: Their Importance in Business-to-Business Industries. In: Petruzzellis, L., Winer, R. (eds) Rediscovering the Essentiality of Marketing. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29877-1_97

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics