Skip to main content

The Fear of Islam: French Context and Reaction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fear of Muslims?

Abstract

Western Europe has seen a radical decline of religious practice in its traditional institutionalised forms. This decline for those faiths that once were a dominant part of Europe’s cultural landscape has coincided with the revival of Islam among the second and third generations of Muslim immigrants. The Muslim presence challenges countries to re-examine their pre-existing understandings of secularity, which are no longer compatible with a commitment to pluralism. There is the need to move away from the narrow understandings of secularity pitting rationality against religious irrationality that dominated the nineteenth century. European countries seem deeply suspicious of religious radicalism, which is regarded as complicit with a hierarchical conception of society and as hostile to individual freedoms, as highlighted by the concern with women’s rights. Islam in France has come to be perceived as subscribing to a conception of gender roles totally incompatible with so-called European values. The concern for women’s rights that figures so prominently in all discussions of Islam in France, however, tends to be part of a discourse that considers Muslim women wearing the hijab or burqa/niqab only as victims. Such dress has become the target of Islamophobia, as symbols of a traditional world that is thought to threaten the future of Europe. Yet, Islamisation now partakes of the individualistic search for meaning and self-realisation that characterises Western societies, a search which in the last 20 years or so has been almost exclusively formulated in the language of the market. Individual self-expression, through patterns of consumption, also effects contemporary Muslims in different parts of the world. At the same time, the social profile of European Muslims is overwhelmingly working class and they have been particularly affected by the disappearance of unskilled jobs. Their segregation in particularly badly serviced urban areas has trapped many in the second and third generations in a vicious cycle of social deprivation. For this marginalised section of the population, Islam, often in its fundamentalist form, has been a way of constructing a positive identity, of building supportive social networks and more broadly of acquiring a code of ethics that enables them to live peacefully alongside mainstream society.

This chapter is an expanded and updated version of a paper previously published by Natalie Doyle in 2011 as Lessons from France: Popularist anxiety and veiled fears of Islam, Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 22(4): 475–489. DOI:10.1080/09596410.2011.606194. © University of Birmingham, reprinted by permission of Taylor & Francis Ltd, www.tandfonline.com on behalf of University of Birmingham. Since that version was published, events that have taken place in France (and Europe more widely) have confirmed the trend which it analysed. Following its introduction of the ‘burqa ban’ discussed below, the French government banned Muslims from using the street for collective prayers, a practice which had developed around some mosques for quite some time in big cities, as a result of the lack of space available which has been documented. Neither the ‘burqa ban’ nor the prohibition of prayers were repealed by the Socialist governments that came into power following the presidential election of 2012. Manuel Valls, first as minister for the interior, then prime minister, have in fact continued to promote a hard interpretation of the French principle of state secularism discussed in this chapter. In neighbouring countries hostility towards Muslims also gathered pace, assuming a variety of forms. The most recent and visible manifestation was the ‘anti-Islamisation’ demonstrations organized in 2014 in the German city of Dresden by the movement PEGIDA (Patriotische Europäer gegen die Islamisierung des Abendlandes).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    France, the United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium now have second and third generations of Muslim residents or citizens. Southern and continental Europe are fast catching up. Information can be found at www.euro-islam.info, a web-based research project established by the French national research body CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) in conjunction with Harvard University.

  2. 2.

    See also Jodie T. Allen (2006).

  3. 3.

    France experienced terrorist attacks by Islamists from the GIA (Groupe Islamique Armé) in 1994.

  4. 4.

    To clarify the way Islamic traditions of female clothing have been discussed, I need to offer brief definitions of the terms used or misused. ‘Hijab’ is a generic Arabic term used to designate the veil covering parts of the female body which female modesty is thought to require. The term was used in the French debates of the 1990s to refer to a scarf covering the head, when earlier the Iranian term ‘chador’ tended to be used, under the influence of the Iranian revolution. The chador is a kind of shawl that does not hide the face, unlike the niqab and burqa. The niqab is a piece of clothing that covers the entire face revealing only the eyes in the tradition of the Persian Gulf. The burqa, used primarily in Afghanistan and parts of Pakistan, is similar to the niqab but goes further in concealing the eyes behind a form of mesh.

  5. 5.

    It must be pointed out that the French model has always been ambivalent as a result of the old legacy of Gallicanism, or state control over Catholicism. This statism was exacerbated in the Turkish model of secularity. Despite the principle of neutrality, the French state never totally abandoned its ambition to exercise control over religious matters. In contemporary times it resurfaced in the creation of the official body representing French Muslims discussed below (see note 11).

  6. 6.

    In 2002, the government of François Fillon made proposals seeking to counter this but not without some degree of controversy and no progress seems to have been made since. On this question of ethnic and racial statistics and French law, see Simon (2008). This lack of statistical data concerns other European countries, with respect also to ethnic identity, a legacy of the history of Nazi persecution of Jews. As a result, the official European agency Eurostat does not compile data based on either religious affiliation or ethnicity.

  7. 7.

    The website www.euro-islam.info has used various sources to establish an estimate of around 16 million Muslims living in Europe (3.25 % of the population). Of the 3.5–5 million Muslims living in France, at least two million have French nationality. The great majority of French Muslims are of North African ancestry.

  8. 8.

    Earlier migrants from North African countries such as Algeria or Morocco, to a large extent having been forced to merge with the existing working class population tended to consider the hijab as a sign of backwardness, hiding women from view and so leaving husbands and children to handle all interactions with the public sphere. This is a point made by Françoise Gaspard and Farhad Khosrokhavar (1998) in their study of the tension between the hijab and French republicanism. With Chala Chafiq and Farhad Khosrokhavar (1995) had earlier investigated the ambivalent meaning of the Muslim forms of headdress in Islamism generally; initially a vehicle of the integration of women in the modern public sphere, it became the instrument of a regressive backlash.

  9. 9.

    The report recommended 26 measures, some of which promoted public recognition of Jewish and Muslim religious festivals having a distinct ‘multicultural’ flavour. Whether this signalled a radical turn from republican universalism as Akan (2009) argues or a pragmatic extension of the state’s duty to protect religious diversity as defined by the law of 1905 on the separation of church and state, remains to be debated. Whilst Anglo-American critics may see this as evidence of a growing acceptance in some sectors of ‘multicultural’ measures designed to counter the historical disadvantage Islam suffers from as a result of its much more recent arrival in France, it must be recognised that this acceptance may in fact be part of an attempt to bring the practice of Islam under the control of the state much more than it is an acceptance of multiculturalism. Hostility to the phenomenon of ‘communitarianism’ (communautarisme)—the formulation of rights-claims based on one’s affiliation with a cultural group—remaining high in France (see note 4). In this respect, it must be noted that those speaking out against the ban on the hijab primarily did so with reference to the individualistic understanding of individual rights that constitutes the historical basis of French republicanism.

  10. 10.

    Jean Baubérot (2003) a leading historian of French secularity and member of the Stasi commission wrote a public letter to its other members proposing a way to avoid a complete ban on the hijab, which he saw as having the potential to alienate further the French Muslim population.

  11. 11.

    The most vocal representative of this position was ‘Ni Putes Ni Soumises’ (Neither Whores Nor Submissives), a French feminist movement created in 2003 by a group of French Muslim women protesting against sexual violence in the areas of French cities mostly inhabited by North African immigrants. Controversially, it has related what it saw as a rise in violence committed against women to the spread of radical Islam in France and taken a strong stance against the hijab as symbol of female oppression.

  12. 12.

    I use the term, ‘neo-fundamentalism’, as Olivier Roy (1994) has defined it. I return below to the significance of this book.

  13. 13.

    For a long time, French Muslims only had very fragmented representation. The creation of one body was first canvassed in the late 1990s. It gained momentum with the events of September 11 2001. The Conseil français du Culte musulman was established as a civil society organisation in 2003 with the strong backing of Nicolas Sarkozy, then Minister of the Interior, but without well-defined functions its claims to provide autonomous representation to four million Muslims in France and lobby the state on their behalf have been tainted with suspicion. See Alexander Caerio (2005).

  14. 14.

    Whilst in the United Kingdom the House of Lords has spoken out in favour of religious freedom and politicians have traditionally considered the issue of the headscarf better handled at the local level, the issue of the burqa/niqab was also raised at the national level in 2006 by Jack Straw MP.

  15. 15.

    The Dutch parliament was first to pass a resolution in 2005 urging the government to ban the wearing of burqas, but it was not enacted.

  16. 16.

    It must be noted that Gauchet’s notion of disenchantment is much broader than that of secularisation, originally promoted by Peter Berger (1967) in the late 1960s, as it is part of an overall theory of the development of modern democracy.

  17. 17.

    Burgat (2003) suggests that the process of re-Islamisation has in fact always possessed the two dimensions, the one pursing the revolutionary conquest of state power not always being the dominant one, as opposed to the re-Islamisation ‘from below’.

  18. 18.

    For a critique of Huntington’s thesis from the point of view of civilisation theory, see Johann Arnason (2003).

  19. 19.

    The Muslim intellectual Tariq Ramadan, because of his family’s historical link to the Muslim Brothers, has been caught up in this suspicion. As Roy has argued, in France he has effectively been demonised. For an analysis of the way his traditionally religious views have been misrepresented, see Roy (2005). This analysis is informed by the definition of religious disenchantment first formulated by Gauchet (1997a).

References

  • Akan M. (2009) Laïcité and multiculturalism: the Stasi Report in context. The British Journal of Sociology, 60(2), 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. T. (2006). The French-Muslim connection: Is France doing a better job of integration than its critics? Pew Research Center. http://goo.gl/a1DGWe. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Allen, C., & Nielsen, J. S. (2002). Summary report on Islamophobia in the EU after 11 September 2001. European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia. http://goo.gl/DL6Zhn. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Arnason, J. P. (2003). Civilisations in dispute: Historical questions and theoretical traditions. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baubérot, J. (2003, December 6). Lettre de Jean Baubérot à la commission Stasi. Islam & Laïcité. http://goo.gl/lmYl5a. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Beckford, J., Joly, D., & Khosrokhavar, F. (2005). Muslims in prison: Challenge and change in Britain and France. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2010) Belgian committee votes for full Islamic veil ban. http://goo.gl/S3K6Lr. Accessed 4 February 2015.

  • Berger, P. (1967). The Sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (1999). The desecularization of the world: A global overview. In P. Berger (Ed.), The Desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics (pp. 1–18). Washington, DC/Grand Rapids: Ethics and Public Policy Center/William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgat, F. (2003). Face to face with political Islam. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caerio, A. (2005). Religious authorities or political actors? The Muslim leaders of the French representative body of Islam. In J. Cesari & S. McLoughlin (Eds.), European Muslims and the secular state (pp. 71–84). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (2000). Ethnicity and globalization: From migrant worker to transnational citizen. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2009). The Age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesari, J. (2005). Islam, secularism and multiculturalism after 9/11: A transatlantic comparison. In J. Cesari & S. McLoughlin (Eds.), European Muslims and the secular state (pp. 39–51). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesari, J. (2008). Muslims in Europe and the risk of radicalism. In C. Rik (Ed.), Jihadi terrorism and the radicalisation challenge in Europe (pp. 97–108). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafiq, C., & Khosrokhavar, F. (1995). Femmes sous le voile: Face à la loi islamique. Paris: Édition du Félin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirac, J. (2003). Lettre de mission. http://goo.gl/N1MqJD. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Chouder, I., Latrèche, M., & Tevanian, P. (2008). Les Filles voilées parlent. Paris: La Fabrique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collectif Contre l’Islamophobie en France (CCIF). (n.d. a). Rapport d’étape du CCIF sur l’Islamophobie en France 2003/2004. http://goo.gl/QWQ25w. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Collectif Contre l’Islamophobie en France (CCIF). (n.d. b). Refus d’octroi de la nationalité: Entretien du CCIF avec les membres de la famille. http://goo.gl/RkaioD. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Commission de reflexion sur l’application du principe de laïcite dans la Republique. (2003, December 11). Rapport au President de la Republique’. http://goo.gl/XBWtw8. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Davie, G. (2002). Europe, the exceptional case: Parameters of faith in the modern world. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euro-Islam.info. (2010). Only three women in Denmark wear burqa. http://goo.gl/aAxhYu. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Euro-Islam.info. (2011). Burqa ban in France to take effect from April 11 2011. http://goo.gl/0SXRY9. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Euro-Islam.info. (n.d. a). Islam in France. http://goo.gl/DRmO7y. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Euro-Islam.info. (n.d. b) Muslims in European politics. http://goo.gl/51L8Kx. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Fautré, W. (2010, June 10). Is the burqa compatible with human rights? The ‘burqa issue’. Paper presented at the conference ‘Burqa and women’s rights’, European Parliament, Brussels. http://goo.gl/lkTqYK. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Gabizon, C. (2009, September 9). Deux mille femmes portent la burqa en France. Le Figaro. http://goo.gl/f8cu6P. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Gaspard, F., & Khosrokhavar, F. (1998). Le Foulard et la République. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauchet, M. (1997a). The Disenchantment of the world: A political history of religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauchet, M. (1997b). Un Monde Désenchanté? Paris: Les Éditions de l’Atelier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauchet, M. (2008). La redéfinition de l’exil et de l’engagement dans la conscience religieuse d’aujourd’hui. In A. Houziaux (Ed.), La religion est-elle encore l’opium du peuple? Questions de vie (pp. 77–91). Paris: Editions de l’Atelier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, P. (2005). L’Islam de marché. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, P., & Amghar, S. (2010). The myth of Muslim conquest. Counterpunch. http://goo.gl/jxUAMw. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, B., Joly, D., & Khosrokhavar, F. (2005). Muslims in prison: Challenge and change in Britain and France. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (2009). Veil: Mirror of identity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (2010). Europe’s problem with the veil. Al-Ahram Weekly. http://goo.gl/FliCRT. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Kepel, G. (1994). The Revenge of God: The resurgence of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in the modern world. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosrokhavar, F. (1997). L’Islam des jeunes. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosrokhavar, F. (2004). L’Islam dans les prisons. Paris: Balland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosrokhavar, F. (2005). Suicide bombers: Allah’s new martyrs. (D. Macey, Trans.). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosrokhavar, F. (2006). Quand Al-Qaïda parle: Témoignages derrière les barreaux. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosrokhavar, F. (2009). Inside jihadism: Understanding jihadi movements worldwide (Yale cultural sociology series). Yale: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, J., & Vaisse, J. (2006). Integrating Islam: Political and religious challenges in contemporary France. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, M. (1992). Les Maisons rouges: Les Partis communistes français et italien de la Libération à nos jours. Paris: Aubier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bars, S. (2008, July 11). Une Marocaine en burqa se voit refuser la nationalité française. Le Monde. http://goo.gl/URWy6h. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Le Bars, S. (2009, June 23). Vivre en France avec le niqab. Le Monde. http://goo.gl/VYZ7Dm. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Lilla, M. (2007). The stillborn god: Religion, politics, and the modern west. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, S. (2008). The choice of ignorance: The debate on ethnic and racial statistics in France. French Politics, Culture & Society, 26, 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2007). The Demands of liberty: Civil society in France since the Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, O. (1994). The Failure of political Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, O. (2005). La Laïcité face à l’islam. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, O. (2008). La Sainte ignorance. Le temps de la religion sans culture. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkozy, N. (2009, June 22). Déclaration du Président de la République devant le Parlement réuni en Congrès. http://goo.gl/BvA2d9. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Sarrazin, T. (2010). Deutschland schafft sich ab: wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen. Munich: Deutsche Verlag Anstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stråth, B. (2002). A European identity: To the historical limits of a concept. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(4), 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tévanian, P. (2005). Le Voile médiatique: Un faux débat; «l’affaire du foulard islamique». Dijon: Raisons d’agir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, E. (1994). Le Destin des immigrés: Assimilation et segregation dans les democraties occidentales (Histoire immediate). Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakulenko, A. (2009). Gender equality as an essential French value: The case of Mme M. Oxford Human Rights Law Review, 9, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zick, A., Küpper, B., & Hövermann, A. (2011). Intolerance, prejudice and discrimination: A European report. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung: Forum Berlin. http://goo.gl/YeK4CH. Accessed 4 Feb 2015.

  • Zuber, V. (2004). La commission Stasi et les paradoxes de la laïcité. In J. Baubérot (Ed.), La laïcité à l’épreuve: Religions et libertés dans le monde (pp. 29–39). Paris: Universalis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie J. Doyle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doyle, N.J. (2016). The Fear of Islam: French Context and Reaction. In: Pratt, D., Woodlock, R. (eds) Fear of Muslims?. Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29698-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics