Skip to main content

Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography in the Evaluation of Colon Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CT Colonography for Radiographers

Abstract

With the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), diagnostic imaging provides an important complementary role to colonoscopy in the management of colorectal pathology. As surgical and oncological therapies have improved, the importance of highly accurate and reproducible imaging has also grown. Further research has gone into the role other modalities may play in patient work-up and management. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the rectum provide high-definition imaging of the local spread of rectal tumours, but cannot assess the proximal bowel or more distant metastatic disease. Abdominal ultrasound is used to identify metastatic involvement of the solid abdominal viscera, but cannot evaluate the primary lesion. MR colonography (MRC) depicts all segments of the colon and can identify visceral and nodal metastases. However, staging of the primary lesion, particularly of early tumours, is limited by the resolution of MRC. In CRC PET-CT studies are useful for the initial diagnosis and staging of the cancer by determining the exact location of a tumour, the extent of disease and whether the cancer has metastasised. PET-CT may be used to detect recurrence of disease and to manage ongoing patient care. PET-CT imaging assists treatment planning by selecting the most effective therapy based on the unique molecular properties of the disease and of the patient’s genetic makeup. The evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment may be determined as related to the response to specific drugs and ongoing therapy. Based on changes in cellular activity observed on PET-CT images, treatment regimens may be changed. MR and PET-CT images are presented to illustrate these modalities’ role in CRC management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lincender-Cvijetic L, Banjin-Cardzic M, Vegar-Zubovic S, Vrcic D. Radiological imaging of rectal cancer. Acta Med Acad. [Review]. 2012;41(2):199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liang TY, Anil G, Ang BW. Imaging paradigms in assessment of rectal carcinoma: loco-regional and distant staging. Cancer Imaging [Review]. 2012;12:290–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Laghi A, Bellini D, Petrozza V, Piccazzo R, Santoro GA, Fabbri C, et al. Imaging of colorectal polyps and early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2015;17(Suppl 1):36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Unsal B, Alper E, Baydar B, Arabul M, Aslan F, Celik M, et al. The efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography in local staging of rectal tumors. Turk J Gastroenterol. [Comparative Study]. 2012;23(5):530–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tapan U, Ozbayrak M, Tatli S. MRI in local staging of rectal cancer: an update. Diagn Interventl Radiol. 2014;20(5):390–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thornton E, Morrin MM, Yee J. Current status of MR colonography. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2010;30(1):201–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Singh M, Vidarsson L, Shroff M. MR imaging at 3.0 T in children: technical differences, safety issues, and initial experience. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. [Review]. 2009;29(5):1451–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dieguez A. Rectal cancer staging: focus on the prognostic significance of the findings described by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Imaging. [Review]. 2013;13(2):277–97.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rafaelsen SR, Vagn-Hansen C, Sorensen T, Ploen J, Jakobsen A. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging measurement of extramural tumor spread in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(36):5021–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kijima S, Sasaki T, Nagata K, Utano K, Lefor AT, Sugimoto H. Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT. World J Gastroenterol. [Review]. 2014;20(45):16964–75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaur H, Choi H, You YN, Rauch GM, Jensen CT, Hou P, et al. MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of primary rectal cancer: practical considerations. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. [Review]. 2012;32(2):389–409.

    Google Scholar 

  12. https://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC51/GC51InfDocuments/English/gc51inf-3-att2_en.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2015.

  13. http://nucleus.iaea.org/HHW/Radiopharmacy/VirRad/Introduction/Radiopharmaceuticals/. Accessed 26/7/2015.

  14. Utility of PET scanning in the management of colorectal cancer. http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/461315. Accessed 22 June 2015.

  15. Basics of FDG. http://www.med.harvard.eduJPNMchetanbasicsbasics.html.mht. Accessed 2 July 2015.

  16. Fact sheet: molecular imaging and colorectal cancer. http://www.snmmi.org/AboutSNMMI/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=5658. Accessed 22 June 2015.

  17. Selzner M, Hany TF, Wildbrett P, McCormack L, Kadry Z, Clavien PA. Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver? Ann Surg. 240(6):1027–34; discussion 1035–6. [Medline].

    Google Scholar 

  18. Even-Sapir E, Parag Y, Lerman H, Gutman M, Levine C, Rabau M. Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection. Radiology. 2004; 232(3):815–22. [Medline].

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vera P, Dubray B, Palie O, et al. Monitoring tumour response during chemo-radiotherapy: a parametric method using FDG-PET/CT images in patients with oesophageal cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2014;4:12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fozy Peer ND Rad (D&NM) SA, D.Tech Rad-SA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mody, K., Peer, F. (2016). Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography in the Evaluation of Colon Cancer. In: Bortz, J., Ramlaul, A., Munro, L. (eds) CT Colonography for Radiographers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29379-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29379-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29377-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29379-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics