Abstract
With the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), diagnostic imaging provides an important complementary role to colonoscopy in the management of colorectal pathology. As surgical and oncological therapies have improved, the importance of highly accurate and reproducible imaging has also grown. Further research has gone into the role other modalities may play in patient work-up and management. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the rectum provide high-definition imaging of the local spread of rectal tumours, but cannot assess the proximal bowel or more distant metastatic disease. Abdominal ultrasound is used to identify metastatic involvement of the solid abdominal viscera, but cannot evaluate the primary lesion. MR colonography (MRC) depicts all segments of the colon and can identify visceral and nodal metastases. However, staging of the primary lesion, particularly of early tumours, is limited by the resolution of MRC. In CRC PET-CT studies are useful for the initial diagnosis and staging of the cancer by determining the exact location of a tumour, the extent of disease and whether the cancer has metastasised. PET-CT may be used to detect recurrence of disease and to manage ongoing patient care. PET-CT imaging assists treatment planning by selecting the most effective therapy based on the unique molecular properties of the disease and of the patient’s genetic makeup. The evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment may be determined as related to the response to specific drugs and ongoing therapy. Based on changes in cellular activity observed on PET-CT images, treatment regimens may be changed. MR and PET-CT images are presented to illustrate these modalities’ role in CRC management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lincender-Cvijetic L, Banjin-Cardzic M, Vegar-Zubovic S, Vrcic D. Radiological imaging of rectal cancer. Acta Med Acad. [Review]. 2012;41(2):199–209.
Liang TY, Anil G, Ang BW. Imaging paradigms in assessment of rectal carcinoma: loco-regional and distant staging. Cancer Imaging [Review]. 2012;12:290–303.
Laghi A, Bellini D, Petrozza V, Piccazzo R, Santoro GA, Fabbri C, et al. Imaging of colorectal polyps and early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2015;17(Suppl 1):36–43.
Unsal B, Alper E, Baydar B, Arabul M, Aslan F, Celik M, et al. The efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography in local staging of rectal tumors. Turk J Gastroenterol. [Comparative Study]. 2012;23(5):530–4.
Tapan U, Ozbayrak M, Tatli S. MRI in local staging of rectal cancer: an update. Diagn Interventl Radiol. 2014;20(5):390–8.
Thornton E, Morrin MM, Yee J. Current status of MR colonography. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. 2010;30(1):201–18.
Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Singh M, Vidarsson L, Shroff M. MR imaging at 3.0 T in children: technical differences, safety issues, and initial experience. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. [Review]. 2009;29(5):1451–66.
Dieguez A. Rectal cancer staging: focus on the prognostic significance of the findings described by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Imaging. [Review]. 2013;13(2):277–97.
Rafaelsen SR, Vagn-Hansen C, Sorensen T, Ploen J, Jakobsen A. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging measurement of extramural tumor spread in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(36):5021–6.
Kijima S, Sasaki T, Nagata K, Utano K, Lefor AT, Sugimoto H. Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT. World J Gastroenterol. [Review]. 2014;20(45):16964–75.
Kaur H, Choi H, You YN, Rauch GM, Jensen CT, Hou P, et al. MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of primary rectal cancer: practical considerations. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. [Review]. 2012;32(2):389–409.
https://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC51/GC51InfDocuments/English/gc51inf-3-att2_en.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2015.
http://nucleus.iaea.org/HHW/Radiopharmacy/VirRad/Introduction/Radiopharmaceuticals/. Accessed 26/7/2015.
Utility of PET scanning in the management of colorectal cancer. http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/461315. Accessed 22 June 2015.
Basics of FDG. http://www.med.harvard.eduJPNMchetanbasicsbasics.html.mht. Accessed 2 July 2015.
Fact sheet: molecular imaging and colorectal cancer. http://www.snmmi.org/AboutSNMMI/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=5658. Accessed 22 June 2015.
Selzner M, Hany TF, Wildbrett P, McCormack L, Kadry Z, Clavien PA. Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver? Ann Surg. 240(6):1027–34; discussion 1035–6. [Medline].
Even-Sapir E, Parag Y, Lerman H, Gutman M, Levine C, Rabau M. Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection. Radiology. 2004; 232(3):815–22. [Medline].
Vera P, Dubray B, Palie O, et al. Monitoring tumour response during chemo-radiotherapy: a parametric method using FDG-PET/CT images in patients with oesophageal cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2014;4:12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mody, K., Peer, F. (2016). Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography in the Evaluation of Colon Cancer. In: Bortz, J., Ramlaul, A., Munro, L. (eds) CT Colonography for Radiographers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29379-0_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29379-0_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29377-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29379-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)