Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Social Concept of Trust as Enabler for Robustness in Open Self-Organising Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trustworthy Open Self-Organising Systems

Part of the book series: Autonomic Systems ((ASYS))

Abstract

The participants in open self-organising systems, including users and autonomous agents, operate in a highly uncertain environment in which the agents’ benevolence cannot be assumed. One way to address this challenge is to use computational trust. By extending the notion of trust as a qualifier of relationships between agents and incorporating trust into the agents’ decisions, they can cope with uncertainties stemming from unintentional as well as intentional misbehaviour. As a consequence, the system’s robustness and efficiency increases. In this context, we show how an extended notion of trust can be used in the formation of system structures, algorithmically to mitigate uncertainties in task and resource allocation, and as a sanctioning and incentive mechanism. Beyond that, we outline how the users’ trust in a self-organising system can be increased, which is decisive for the acceptance of these systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pasquier, P., Flores, R., Chaib-draa, B.: Modelling flexible social commitments and their enforcement. In: Gleizes, M.-P., Omicini, A., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) Engineering Societies in the Agents World V, vol. 3451, pp. 898–898. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2005). ISBN:978-3-540-27330-1

    Google Scholar 

  2. Artikis, A., Pitt, J.: Specifying open agent systems: a survey. In: Artikis, A., Picard, G., Vercouter, L. (eds.) Engineering Societies in the Agents World IX, vol. 5485, pp. 29–45. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2009). ISBN:978-3-642-02561-7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Cossentino, M., Gaud, N., Hilaire, V., Galland, S., Koukam, A.: ASPECS: an agent-oriented software process for engineering complex systems. Auton. Agents Multi-agent Syst. 20, 260–304 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boon, S., Holmes, J.: The dynamics of interpersonal trust: resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In: Hinde, R., Groebel, J. (eds.) Cooperation and Prosocial Behaviour, pp. 190–211. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., Camerer, C.: Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 393–404 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ba, S., Pavlou, P.: Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Q. 26, 243–268 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., Halberstadt, A.: A computational model of trust and reputation. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’02), Big Island, pp. 188–196 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corritore, C., Kracher, B., Wiedenbeck, S.: On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 58, 737–758 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koller, M.: Risk as a determinant of trust. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 9, 265–276 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramchurn, S., Huynh, D., Jennings, N.: Trust in multi-agent systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 19, 1–25 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marsh, S.P.: Formalising trust as a computational concept. PhD thesis, University of Stirling Digital Repository (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kantert, J., Edenhofer, S., Tomforde, S., Hähner, J., Müller-Schloer, C.: Normative control – controlling open distributed systems with autonomous entities. In: Reif, W., Anders, G., Seebach, H., Steghöfer, J.-P., André, E., Hähner, J., Müller-Schloer, C., Ungerer, T. (eds.) Autonomic Systems, vol. 7, pp. 87–123 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust (English). Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 709–734 (1995). ISSN:03637425

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, H., Shen, Z., Leung, C., Miao, C., Lesser, V.: A survey of multi-agent trust management systems. IEEE Access 1, 35–50 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Social regret, a reputation model based on social relations. ACM SIGecom Exch. 3, 44–56 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C., Godo, L.: Devising a trust model for multiagent interactions using confidence and reputation. Appl. Artif. Intell. 18, 833–852 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jonker, C., Treur, J.: Formal analysis of models for the dynamics of trust based on experiences. In: Garijo, F., Boman, M. (eds.) Multi-agent System Engineering, vol. 1647, pp. 221–231. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (1999). ISBN:978-3-540-66281-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Social trust: a cognitive approach. In: Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y.-H. (eds.) Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies, pp. 55–90. Kluwer Academic, Norwell (2001). ISBN:0-7923-6919-X

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. McKnight, D., Cummings, L., Chervany, N.: Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 473–490 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jøsang, A., Pope, S.: Semantic constraints for trust transitivity. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling, vol. 43, pp. 59–68. Australian Computer Society, Newcastle (2005). ISBN:1-920-68225-2

    Google Scholar 

  21. Good, D.: Individuals, interpersonal relations, and trust. In: Gambetta, D. (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, pp. 31–48. Department of Sociology, University of Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jones, K.: Trust as an affective attitude (English). Ethics 107, 4–25 (1996). ISSN:00141704

    Google Scholar 

  23. He, R., Niu, J., Zhang, G.: CBTM: A trust model with uncertainty quantification and reasoning for pervasive computing. In: Pan, Y., Chen, D., Guo, M., Cao, J., Dongarra, J. (eds.) Parallel and Distributed Processing and Applications, pp. 541–552. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2005). ISBN:978-3-540-29769-7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y., Singh, M.P.: Formal trust model for multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, pp. 1551–1556. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kuter, U., Golbeck, J.: Using probabilistic confidence models for trust inference in web-based social networks. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 10, 8:1–8:23 (2010). ISSN:1533-5399

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marsh, S.: Optimism and pessimism in trust. In: In Proceedings of the Ibero-American Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IBERAMIA ’94), Caracas. McGraw-Hill Publishing (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schillo, M., Funk, P., Rovatsos, M.: Using trust for detecting deceitful agents in artificial societies. Appl. Artif. Intell. 14, 825–848 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Aref, A.M., Tran, T.T.: A decentralized trustworthiness estimation model for open, multiagent systems (DTMAS). J. Trust Manag. 2, 1–20 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jøsang, A.: Robustness of trust and reputation systems: does it matter? In: Proceedings of IFIPTM International Conference on Trust Management (IFIPTM 2012), Surat. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sun, Y., Han, Z., Liu, K.: Defense of trust management vulnerabilities in distributed networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 46, 112–119 (2008). ISSN:0163-6804

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yao, Y., Ruohomaa, S., Xu, F.: Addressing common vulnerabilities of reputation systems for electronic commerce. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 7, 1–20 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Grossi, D., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F.: Ubi Lex, Ibi Poena: designing norm enforcement in E-institutions. In: Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N., Matson, E. (eds.) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems II, vol. 4386, pp. 101–114. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2007). ISBN:978-3-540-74457-3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Horling, B., Lesser, V.: A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 19, 281–316 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shehory, O., Kraus, S.: Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. Artif. Intell. 101, 165–200 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Breban, S., Vassileva, J.: Long-term coalitions for the electronic marketplace. In: Proceedings of the E-Commerce Applications Workshop at the Canadian AI Conference, Ottawa (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Breban, S., Vassileva, J.: A coalition formation mechanism based on inter-agent trust relationships. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, pp. 306–307. ACM, New York (2002). ISBN:1-58113-480-0

    Google Scholar 

  37. Griffiths, N., Luck, M.: Coalition formation through motivation and trust. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 17–24. ACM, Melbourne (2003). ISBN:1-58113-683-8

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chalkiadakis, G., Robu, V., Kota, R., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.R.: Cooperatives of distributed energy resources for efficient virtual power plants. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Taipei, vol. 2, pp. 787–794 (2011). ISBN:0-9826571-6-1, 978-0-9826571-6-4

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chevaleyre, Y., Dunne, P.E., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Lemaître, M., Maudet, N., Padget, J., Phelps, S., Rodríguez-aguilar, J.A., Sousa, P.: Issues in multiagent resource allocation. Informatica 30, 3–31 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Dash, R.K., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R.: Trust-based mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 2, pp. 748–755. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., Ruszczyński, A.: Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hentenryck, P.V., Bent, R.: Online Stochastic Combinatorial Optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge/London (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Porter, R., Ronen, A., Shoham, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: Mechanism design with execution uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Edmonton, pp. 414–421 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dash, R., Vytelingum, P., Rogers, A., David, E., Jennings, N.: Market-based task allocation mechanisms for limited-capacity suppliers. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: IEEE Trans. Syst. Hum. 37, 391–405 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vytelingum, P., Voice, T., Ramchurn, S., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.: Agent-based micro-storage management for the smart grid. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Toronto, vol. 1, pp. 39–46 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Pitt, J., Nowak, A.: The reinvention of social capital for socio-technical systems [Special Section Introduction]. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 33, 27–80 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Pitt, J., Schaumeier, J., Artikis, A.: Axiomatization of socio-economic principles for self-organizing institutions: concepts, experiments and challenges. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. (TAAS) 7, 39 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Boella, G., Pigozzi, G., van der Torre, L.: Normative systems in computer science – ten guidelines for normative multiagent systems. In: Boella, G., Noriega, P., Pigozzi, G., Verhagen, H. (eds.) Normative Multi-agent Systems. Schloss Dagstuhl, Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Norms as mental objects. From normative beliefs to normative goals. In: Castelfranchi, C., Müller, J.-P. (eds.) From Reaction to Cognition, vol. 957, pp. 186–196. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (1995). ISBN:978-3-540-60155-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Vasalou, A., Pitt, J.: Reinventing forgiveness: a formal investigation of moral facilitation. In: Herrmann, P., Issarny, V., Shiu, S. (eds.) Trust Management, vol. 3477, pp. 39–90. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2005). ISBN:978-3-540-26042-4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Marsh, S., Briggs, P.: Examining trust, forgiveness and regret as computational concepts. In: Golbeck, J. (ed.) Computing with Social Trust, pp. 9–43. Springer, London (2009). ISBN:978-1-84800-356-9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Artikis, A., Sergot, M., Pitt, J.: Specifying norm-governed computational societies. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. (TOCL) 10, 1 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rothrock, L., Koubek, R., Fuchs, F., Haas, M., Salvendy, G.: Review and reappraisal of adaptive interfaces: toward biologically inspired paradigms. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 3, 47–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Müller, J., Exeler, J., Buzeck, M., Krüger, A.: ReflectiveSigns: digital signs that adapt to audience attention. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing, pp. 17–24. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Röcker, C., Hinske, S., Magerkurth, C.: Intelligent privacy support for large public displays. In: Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction International 2007 (HCII’07). Beijing, China (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Trust Theory: A Socio-Cognitive and Computational Model. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Grandison, T., Sloman, M.: A survey of trust in internet applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 3, 2–16 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kini, A., Choobineh, J.: Trust in electronic commerce: definition and theoretical considerations. Proc. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. 31, 51–61 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, W.: A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Rev. Educ. Res. 70, 547 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Glass, A., McGuinness, D.L., Wolverton, M.: Toward establishing trust in adaptive agents. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’08), pp. 227–236. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hammer, S., Wißner, M., André, E.: A user trust model for automatic decision-making in ubiquitous and self-adaptive environments. In: Reif, W., Anders, G., Seebach, H., Steghöfer, J.-P., André, E., Hähner, J., Müller-Schloer, C., Ungerer, T. (eds.) Autonomic Systems, vol. 7, pp. 55–86 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yan, Z., Holtmanns, S.: Computer Security Privacy and Politics: Current Issues, Challenges and Solutions, pp. 290–323. IGI Global. Hershey, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

References Originating from the OC-Trust Project

  1. Anders, G., Schiendorfer, A., Siefert, F., Steghöfer, J.-P., Reif, W.: Cooperative resource allocation in open systems of systems. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 10, 11:1–11:44 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anders, G., Siefert, F., Steghöfer, J.-P., Reif, W.: Trust-based scenarios – predicting future agent behavior in open self-organizing systems. In: Elmenreich, W., Dressler, F., Loreto, V. (eds.) Self-Organizing Systems, vol. 8221, pp. 90–102. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2014). ISBN:978-3-642-54139-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Steghöfer, J.-P., Reif, W.: Die Guten, die Bösen und die Vertrauenswürdigen–Vertrauen im Organic Computing. Informatik-Spektrum 35, 119–131 (2012) (in German)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiefhaber, R., Anders, G., Siefert, F., Ungerer, T., Reif, W.: Confidence as a means to assess the accuracy of trust values. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom-2012), Liverpool, pp. 690–697. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kiefhaber, R., Jahr, R., Msadek, N., Ungerer, T.: Ranking of direct trust, confidence, and reputation in an abstract system with unreliable components. In: Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on and 10th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing (UIC/ATC), Sorrento Peninsula, Italy, pp. 388–395 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kiefhaber, R., Hammer, S., Savs, B., Schmitt, J., Roth, M., Kluge, F., Andre, E., Ungerer, T.: The neighbor-trust metric to measure reputation in organic computing systems. In: 2011 Fifth IEEE Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-organizing Systems Workshops (SASOW), Ann Arbor, pp. 41–46 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernard, Y., Klejnowski, L., Hähner, J., Müller-Schloer, C.: Towards trust in desktop grid systems. In: IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, pp. 637–642. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2010). ISBN:978-0-7695-4039-9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klejnowski, L.: Trusted community: a novel multiagent organisation for open distributed systems. PhD thesis, Leibniz Universität Hannover (2014). http://edok01.tib.uni-hannover.de/edoks/e01dh11/668667427.pdf

  9. Anders, G., Siefert, F., Reif, W.: A Heuristic for Constrained Set Partitioning in the Light of Heterogeneous Objectives. In: Agents and Artificial Intelligence. LNAI. Lisbon, Portugal (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Msadek, N., Kiefhaber, R., Ungerer, T.: A trustworthy fault-tolerant and scalable self-configuration algorithm for organic computing systems. J. Syst. Archit. 61 (10), 511–519 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Msadek, N., Kiefhaber, R., Ungerer, T.: Trustworthy self-optimization in organic computing environments. Architecture of Computing Systems – ARCS 2015, pp. 123–134. Porto, Portugal (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kantert, J., Scharf, H., Edenhofer, S., Tomforde, S., Hähner, J., Müller-Schloer, C.: A graph analysis approach to detect attacks in multi-agent-systems at runtime. In: 2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, pp. 80–89. IEEE, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Edenhofer, S., Stifter, C., Jänen, U., Kantert, J., Tomforde, S., Hähner, J., Müller-Schloer, C.: An accusation-based strategy to handle undesirable behaviour in multi-agent systems. In: 2015 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Autonomic Computing Workshops (ICACW). Grenoble, France (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steghöfer, J.-P., Kiefhaber, R., Leichtenstern, K., Bernard, Y., Klejnowski, L., Reif, W., Ungerer, T., André, E., Hähner, J., Müller-Schloer, C.: Trustworthy organic computing systems: challenges and perspectives. In: Xie, B., Branke, J., Sadjadi, S., Zhang, D., Zhou, X. (eds.) Autonomic and Trusted Computing, vol. 6407, pp. 62–76. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2010). ISBN:978-3-642-16575-7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurdyukova, E., Bee, K., André, E.: Friend or foe? Relationship-based adaptation on public displays. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Ambient Intelligence, pp. 228–237. Springer, Amsterdam (2011). ISBN:978-3-642-25166-5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is partly sponsored by the research unit OC-Trust (FOR 1085) of the German Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Software and Systems Engineering, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Gerrit Anders, Hella Seebach & Wolfgang Reif

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology | University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Jan-Philipp Steghöfer

  3. Human-Centered Multimedia, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Elisabeth André

  4. Organic Computing Group, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Jörg Hähner

  5. Institute of Systems Engineering, University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    Christian Müller-Schloer

  6. Systems and Networking Group, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Theo Ungerer

Authors
  1. Gerrit Anders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hella Seebach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan-Philipp Steghöfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wolfgang Reif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elisabeth André
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jörg Hähner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christian Müller-Schloer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Theo Ungerer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerrit Anders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Software and Systems Engin, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Wolfgang Reif

  2. Institute for Software and Systems Engin, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Bayern, Germany

    Gerrit Anders

  3. Institute for Software and Systems Engin, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Hella Seebach

  4. Department of Computer Science and Engin, Chalmers University of Technology Univer, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Jan-Philipp Steghöfer

  5. Human-Centered Multimedia, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Elisabeth André

  6. Organic Computing Group, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Bayern, Germany

    Jörg Hähner

  7. Institute of Systems Engineering, University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    Christian Müller-Schloer

  8. Systems and Networking Group, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Theo Ungerer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anders, G. et al. (2016). The Social Concept of Trust as Enabler for Robustness in Open Self-Organising Systems. In: Reif, W., et al. Trustworthy Open Self-Organising Systems. Autonomic Systems. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29201-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29201-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29199-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29201-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation