Skip to main content

Ethical Issues in Pediatric Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Issues in Pediatric Organ Transplantation

Abstract

Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) enables improved function and quality of life for those who have lost anatomical parts such as a limb and the relief of profound suffering for those with severe facial disfiguration. VCA differs from vital organ transplantation in two important ways: (1) these transplants are not necessary for recipient survival, impacting risk-benefit ratios; and (2) face and limb transplants are visible and touchable, leading to issues of identity changes, social interaction and psychological adjustments. This chapter will consider the ethical implications of VCA in pediatrics. This chapter will be divided into the following six sections: (1) introduction; (2) the state of the science and experience with VCA; (3) risk-benefit assessment; (4) informed consent (i) donors and donor surrogate decision makers (ii) recipients and recipient surrogate decision makers; (5) establishing a pediatric program (i) recipient selection (ii) allocation; (iii) accountability for surgical innovation and (6) conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kawai T, Leventhal J, Madsen JC, Strober S, Turka LA, Wood KJ. Tolerance: one transplant for life. Transplantation. 2014;98(2):117–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kerkar N, Danialifar T. Changing definitions of successful outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2013;19(5):480–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor GS. T cell-based therapies for EBV-associated malignancies. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2004;4(1):11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Geissler EK, Hutchinson JA. Cell therapy as a strategy to minimize maintenance immunosuppression in solid orgain transplant recipients. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2013;18(4):408–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barth RN, Rodrigues ED, Mundinger GS, Nam AJ, Hui-Chou H, Jones LS, et al. Vascularized bone marrow-based immunosuppression inhibits rejection of vascularized composite allografts in nonhuman primates. Am J Transpl. 2011;11(7):1407–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Avery RK. Update on infections in composite tissue allotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transpl. 2013;18(6):659–64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shores JT, Higgins JP, Lee WP. Above-elbow (supracondylar) arm transplantation: clinical considerations and surgical technique. Tech Han Up Extrem Surg. 2013;17(4):221–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smeets R, Rendenbach C, Birkelbach M, Al-Dam A, Grobe A, Hanken H, et al. Face transplantation: on the verge of becoming clinical routine? Bioemed Res Int. 2014;2014:907272.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khalifian S, Brazio PS, Mohan R, Shaffer C, Brandacher G, Barth RN, et al. Facial transplantation: the first 9 years. Lancet. 2014;384(9960):2153–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy BD, Zuker RM, Borschel GH. Vascularized composite allotransplantation: an update on medical and surgical progress and remaining challenges. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013; 66(11):1449–552.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jo HK, Park JW, Hwang JH, Kim KS, Lee SY, Shin JH. Risk acceptance and expectations of laryngeal allotransplantation. Arch Plast Surg. 2014;41(5):505–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petruzzo P, Dubernard JM. The international registry on hand and composite tissue allotransplantation. Clin Transpl. 2011:247–53.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The DASH Outcome Measure. Disabilities of arm shoulder and hand. Available from: http://dash.iwh.on.ca.

  14. Shores JT, Brandacher G, Lee WA. Hand and upper extremity transplantation: an update of outcomes in the worldwide experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mohan R, Fisher M, Dorafshar A, Sosin M, Bojovic B, Gandhi D, et al. Principles of face transplant revision: beyond primary repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(6):1295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dahlborg EJ, Diaz-Siso JR, Bueno EM, Sisk GC, Pomahac B. The value of innovation: face and hand transplantation programs at Brigham and women’s hospital. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(1):178e–9e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Broyles JM1, Alrakan M, Ensor CR, Khalifian S, Kotton CN, Avery RK, et al. Characterization, prophylaxis, and treatment of infectious complications in craniomaxillofacial and upper extremity allotransplantation: a multicenter perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(4):543e-51e.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Byrne PJ, Gordon C2, Lee WP. Face transplant teams and the collaboration imperative. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014;16(2):83–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khalifan S, Brazio PS, Mohan R, Shaffer C, Brandacher G, Barth RN, et al. Facial transplantation: the first 9 years. The Lancent. 2014: 384(9960):2153–63.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gander B, Brown CS, Vasilic D, Furr A, Banis JC, Cunningham M, et al. Composite tissue allotransplantation of the hand and face: a new frontier in transplant and reconstructive surgery. Transpl Int. 2006;19(11):868–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zuker RM, Redett R, Alman B, Coles JG, Timoney N, Ein SH. First successful lower-extremity transplantation: technique and functional result. J Reconst Microsurg. 2006;22(4):239–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Siemionow M, Ozturk C. Face transplantation: outcomes, concerns, controversies, and future directions. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(1):254–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Siemionow M, Gordon CR. Overview of guidelines for establishing a face transplant program: a work in progress. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(5):1290–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gordon CR, Siemionow M. Requirements for the development of a hand transplantation program. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63(3):262–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Flynn J, Zlotnik Shaul R, Hanson MD, Borschel GH, Zuker R. Pediatric facial transplantation: Ethical considerations. Can. J Plast Surg. 2014;22(2):67–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Washington KM, Zanoun RR, Cadogan KA, Afrooz PN, Losee JE. Composite tissue allotransplantation for the reconstruction of congenital craniofacial defects. Transpl Proc. 2009;41(2):523–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinstein JM, Chamlin SL. Quality of life in vascular anomalies. Lymphat Res Biol. 2005;3(4):256–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Terr LC, Abright AR, Brody M, Donner S, Eth S, Fine L, Fornari V, Jetmalani A, Livingston R, Powers JH, Robson K. When formulation outweighs diagnosis: 13 “moments” in psychotherapy. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45(10):1252–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanson MD, Zuker RM, Zlotnik Shaul R. Pediatric facial burns: is facial transplantation the new reconstructive psychosurgery? Can J Plast Surg. 2008;16(4):205–10.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leonard DA, Gordon CR, Sachs DH, Cetrulo CL Jr. Immunobiology of face transplantation. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(1):268–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huxtable R, Woodley J. Gaining face or losing face? Framing the debate on face transplants. Bioethics. 2005;19(5–6):505–22 (PubMed PMID: 16425487).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Swindell JS. Facial allograft transplantation, personal identity and subjectivity. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(8):449–53 (PubMed PMID: 1766430).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Caplan A, Katz D. In brief: about face. Hastings center report. 2003;33(1)1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baylis F. A face is not just like a hand: pace Barker. Am J Bioethics 2004;4(3):30–2. PubMed PMID: 16192132.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Siemionow M, Sonmez E. Face as an organ. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61(3):345–52. PubMed PMID:18724140.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gordon CR1, Siemionow M, Papay F, Pryor L, Gatherwright J, Kodish E, et al. The world’s experience with facial transplantation: what have we learned thus far? Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63(5):572–8. PubMed PMID 19806039.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sheridan RL, Hinson MI, Liang MH, Nackel AF, Schoenfield DA, Ryan CM, et al. Long-term outcome of children surviving massive burns. JAMA. 2000;283(1):69–73 (PubMed PMID: 10632282).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Landolt MA, Grubenmann S, Meuli M. Family impact greatest: predictors of quality of life and psychological adjustment in pediatric burn survivors. J Trauma. 2002;53(6):1146–51 (PubMed PMID: 12478042).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Noronha DO, Faust J. Identifying the variables impacting post-burn psychological adjustment: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007;32(3):380–91 (PubMed PMID: 16882947).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aitken ME, Tilford JM, Barrett KW, Parker JG, Simpson P, Landgraf J, et al. Health status of children after admission for injury. Pediatrics. 2002;110(2):337–42 (PubMed PMID:12165587).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Veatch RM. Transplantation ethics, Chapter 19. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mill JS. Utilitarianism. Dover thrift edition 2007. In: Waldrop MC, Rogers TNR, editors; 1861.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rawls JA. Theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gordon CR, Siemionow M, Coffman C, Alam D, Eghtesad B, Zins JE, et al. The cleveland clinic FACES score: a preliminary assessment tool for identifying the optimal face transplant candidate. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(6):1969–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kumnig M, Jowsey SG, DiMartini AF. Psychological aspects of hand transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transpl. 2014;19(2):188–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cendales LC, Rahmel A, Pruett TL. Allocation of vascularized composite allografts: what is it? Transplantation. 2012;93(11):1086–7 (PubMed PMID: 22406818).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Angelos P. Ethics and surgical innovation: challenges to the professionalism of surgeons. Int J Surg. (2013) 11(51), 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Babu MA, Heary RF, Nahed BV. Device innovation in neurosurgery: controversu, learning, and future directions. Neurosurgery. 2012;(4)70:789–795.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dixon JB, Logue J, Komesaroff PA. Promises and ethical pitfalls of surgical innovation: the case of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1698–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Johnson J, Rogers W. Innovative surgery: the ethical challenges. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Knight JL. The dark side of surgical innovation innovations 2012;(5)7: 307–313.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sagar SP, Law PW, Zlotnik Shaul R, Heon E, Langer JC, Wright JG, Hey, I. Just did a new operation! Ann Surg. 2014 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Johnson J, Rogers W. Innovative surgery: the ethical challenges. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(1):9–12 (PubMed PMID: 21697295).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Riskin DJ, Longaker MT, Krummel TM. The ethics of innovation in pediatric surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2006;15(4):319–23 (PubMed PMID: 17055963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chagpar AB. Innovation in surgery: from imagination to implementation. Am J Surg. 2011;202(6):641–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Dahm P. The IDEAL stages of surgical innovation: distinguishing the development and exploration stages. Contemp Clin Trials. Letter to the Editor. 2014; 37(2):176–77.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sagar SP, Law PW, Zlotnik Shaul R, Heon E, Langer JC, Wright JG. Hey, I just did a new operation! Introducing innovative procedures and devices within an academic health center. Ann Surg. 2014; 00(00).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Coffman KL, Siemionow MZ. Ethics of facial transplantation revisted. Curr Opin Organ Transpl. 2014;19:181–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Errico M, Metcalfe NH, Platt A. History and ethics of hand transplant. JR Soc Med Sh Rep. 2012;3:74.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Evans LA, Experiences of healthcare team members involved in facial transplant surgery and patient care. Nurs. Res. 2013;62(6):372.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Siemionow M, Ozturk C, Face transplantation: outcomes, concerns, controversies and future directions. J Craniof Surg. 2012;23(1):254.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rosenthal R, Schafer J, Briel M, Bucher HC, Oertli D, Dell-Kuster S. How to write a surgical clinical research protocol: literature review and practical guide. Am J Surg. 2014;207(2):299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rogers WA, Johnson J. Addressing within-role conflicts of interest in surgery. J Bioeth Inq. 2013;10(2):219–25 (PubMed PMID: 23519587).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Dixon JB, Logue J, Komesaroff PA. Promises and ethical pitfalls of surgical innovation: the case of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23(10):1698–702 (PubMed PMID: 23907325).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Zlotnik Shaul R, McDonald M, Langer JC. Facilitating innovation in the clinical setting: a pathway for operationalizing accountability. Healthc Q. 2009;12(3):60–65 (PubMed PMID: 19553766).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Evans LA. Experiences of healthcare team members involved in facial transplant surgery and patient care. Nurs. Res. 2013;62(6):372–82 (PubMed PMID: 24165213).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Institute of Medicine. 2013. Interprofessional education for collaboration: learning how to improve health from interprofessional models across the continuum of education to practice: workshop summary. Global Forum on Innovation in Health Professional Education, Board on Global Health, 1Y150.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bueno EM, Diaz-Siso JR, Pomahac B. A multi-disciplinary protocol for face transplantation at Brigham and women’s hospital. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(12):1572–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Singhal D, Pribaz JJ, Pomahac B. Face transplant program: a look back. Plastic Reconstr Surg 129:1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randi Zlotnik Shaul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shaul, R.Z., Borschel, G.H., Flynn, J., Hanson, M.D., Wright, L., Zuker, R.M. (2016). Ethical Issues in Pediatric Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. In: Greenberg, R., Goldberg, A., RodrĂ­guez-Arias, D. (eds) Ethical Issues in Pediatric Organ Transplantation. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 66. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29185-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics