Abstract
Teachers spend a substantial amount of their work time on assessment, yet school assessment processes and practices continue to be an area characterised as “a problem.” The supposed problem comes into stark relief when considered against the moves by governments internationally towards large-scale testing for comparative reporting purposes, and the development of school testing corporations. Nevertheless, it is widely recognised in education research, policy, and practice that assessment can and should be used to improve, not just to report, student learning. Also recognised is that increasing emphasis on accountability policies around the world carries potentially negative consequences for teaching and assessment practices. Research has shown that school leaders play a critical role in responding to accountability pressures through development of school policies and practices that ensure assessment evidence will be used to improve student learning. Further, leadership in assessment and developing an assessment culture must be shared activity if ongoing change is to occur in practice. We outline three stages, distilled from research, that translate the rhetoric of effective leadership in assessment into developing an assessment for learning culture in the school: developing a school policy for managing student assessment to support learning; building a positive and constructive learning culture within the school; and encouraging a broad range of learning activities and learning outcomes. We provide practical direction for essential components of these stages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The use of educational accountability data for such purposes is fraught with many issues including technical issues such as data validity, especially for the purpose; reliability; use of value-added models, and, if so, which model (Pullin 2013). It is not the focus of this article to consider either these technical issues or the morality of use of accountability data for such purposes.
References
Alton-Lee, A. (2011). (Using) evidence for educational improvement. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 303–329.
Assessment Reform Group (ARG). (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. London: nferNelson.
Assessment Reform Group (ARG). (2002). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Athanasou, J. (2010). NAPLAN and my school survey. Barton: Independent Education Union of Australia (IEUA).
Australian Primary Principals Association. (2012). Submission to the Australian Senate Inquiry: Teaching and learning—Maximising our investment in Australian schools. Kingston: APPA.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Boyle, W., & Charles, M. (2010). Leading learning through assessment for learning? School Leadership and Management: Formerly School Organisation, 30(3), 285–300. doi:10.1080/13632434.2010.485184.
Cumming, J. J., & Maxwell, G. (1999). Contextualising authentic assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 6(2), 177–194.
Department of Education (DoE[US]). (2010). Secretary Arne Duncan’s remarks at OECD’s release of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 results. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/secretary-arne-duncans-remarks-oecds-release-program-international-student-assessment-
Dinham, S. (2005). Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(4), 338–356.
Dulfer, N., Polesel, J., & Rice, S. (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. An educator’s perspective. Sydney: Whitlam Institute, University of Western Sydney.
Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning—Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning. California: Corwin Press.
Gove, M. (2010). PISA slip should put a rocket under our world-class ambitions and drive us to win the education space race. The Times Educational Supplement. Retrieved from http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6066185
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. In T. Townsend & J. MacBeath (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 1123–1247). London: Springer.
Harlen, W. (2004). A systematic review of the evidence of the impact on students, teachers and the curriculum of the process of using assessment by teachers for summative purposes. London: EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education.
Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning: Tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207–223.
Harlen, W., & Deakin-Crick, R. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students’ motivation for learning. London: EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education.
Heilig, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 75–110.
Jennings, J., & Dorn, S. (2008). The proficiency trap: New York City’s achievement gap revisited. Teachers College Record. tcrecord.org ID Number: 15366.
Johnson, G., Wyatt-Smith, C., Dempster, N., Neville, M., & Colbert, P. (2013). Leading learning in the secondary context: Reflections on the SPALL Project. Brisbane: Griffith University.
Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012). The impact of high stakes testing: The Australian story. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 65–71.
Leithwood, K. (2012). School leadership, evidence-based, decision-making, and large-scale student assessment. In C. Webber & J. Lupart (Eds.), Leading student assessment (pp. 17–40). Dordrecht: Springer.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management: Formerly School Organisation, 28(1), 27–42. doi:10.1080/13632430701800060.
MacBeath, J., & Dempster, N. (2009). Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice. London: Routledge.
MacBeath, J., Frost, D., & Swaffield, S. (2005). Researching leadership for learning in seven countries (The Carpe Vitam project). Education Research and Perspectives, 32(2), 24–42.
Maxwell, G. S., Cumming, J. J., Wyatt-Smith, C. M., & Colbert, P. (2012a). Managing student assessment to support learning: 1. Developing a school policy. Brisbane: Griffith University.
Maxwell, G. S., Cumming, J. J., Wyatt-Smith, C. M., & Colbert, P. (2012b). Managing student assessment to support learning: 2. Building a positive and constructive ‘learning culture’ within the school. Brisbane: Griffith University.
Maxwell, G. S., Cumming, J. J., Wyatt-Smith, C. M., & Colbert, P. (2012c). Managing student assessment to support learning: 3. Encouraging a broad range of learning activities and learning outcomes. Brisbane: Griffith University.
Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2011). Profound improvement. Building learning-community capacity on living system principles (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory in Practice, 48(4), 4–11.
Popham, W. J. (2014). Looking at assessment through learning-colored lenses. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert (Eds.), The enabling power of assessment (pp. 183–194). Dordrecht: Springer.
Pullin, D. (2013). Legal issues in the use of student test scores and value-added models (VAM) to determine educational quality. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(6), 1–27.
Robinson, V. (2010). From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical findings and methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(1), 1–26. doi:10.1080/15700760903026748.
Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best evidence synthesis iteration (Report to the Ministry of Education, Wellington, New Zealand). Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/60180/BES-Leadership-Web.pdf
Shepard, L. (2003). Reconsidering large-scale assessment to heighten its relevance to learning. In J. M. Atkin & J. Coffey (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 21–146). Arlington: NSTA Press.
Stiggins, R., & Duke, D. (2008). Effective instructional leadership requires assessment leadership. The Phi Delta Kappan, 90(4), 285–291.
Swaffield, S. (2008). Critical friendship, dialogue and learning, in the context of leadership for learning. School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, 28(4), 323–336.
Teachers Registration Board of South Australia. (2012). Annual report 2012. Adelaide: TRBSA.
Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2011). Challenges for Australian education: Results from PISA 2009: The PISA 2009 assessment of students’ reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Tomazin, F. (2013). Schools caught cheating on NAPLAN. National Times. Retrieved from http://www.nationaltimes.com.au/victoria/schools-caught-cheating-on-naplan-20130216-2ek6p.html
Tveit, S. (2009). Educational assessment in Norway—A time of change. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Joy Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century. Connecting theory and practice (pp. 227–244). Dordrecht: Springer.
Webber, C., Lupart, J., & Scott, S. (2012). The ecology of student assessment. In C. Webber & J. Lupart (Eds.), Leading student assessment (pp. 283–296). Dordrecht: Springer.
Webber, C., Scott, S., Aitken, N., Lupart, J., & Scott, D. (2013). Leading assessment for enhanced student outcomes. School Leadership and Management: Formerly School Organisation, 33(3), 240–255. doi:10.1080/13632434.2013.773885.
Wyatt-Smith, C. M., Bridges, S., & Hedemann, M. (2008). A professional learning model for rethinking educational disadvantage: Partnerships for local and system networks. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(3), 1–20.
Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., & Colbert, P. (Eds.). (2014). Designing assessment for quality learning (Foundation book in the series: The enabling power of assessment). Dordrecht: Springer.
Young, E. (2005). Assessment is for learning—Assessment for learning: Embedding and extending. Retrieved from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/Assessment%20for%20Learning%20version%202vp_tcm4-385008.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cumming, J.J., Maxwell, G.S., Wyatt-Smith, C.M. (2016). School Leadership in Assessment in an Environment of External Accountability: Developing an Assessment for Learning Culture. In: Johnson, G., Dempster, N. (eds) Leadership in Diverse Learning Contexts. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28302-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28302-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28300-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28302-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)