Skip to main content

The Effect of Soil Moisture and Texture on Fe Concentration Using Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Soil Morphometrics

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL))

Abstract

Portable XRF (pXRF) instruments can be used in the field for measurement of soil elemental concentrations. The pXRF measurements in the field, however, are affected by several factors including soil texture, moisture and sample heterogeneity. In this chapter, we investigated the effect of moisture on the Fe concentration of pXRF laboratory and field measurements. In the laboratory study, soil samples were analysed that were wetted to different moisture contents. In the field study, pXRF measurements were made from topsoil samples and the data were compared to samples that were air-dried and ground to pass a 2-mm sieve. Soil moisture mainly dampens the X-ray intensity resulting in lower Fe concentrations, and this effect is more pronounced for clayey soils (higher Fe content) as compared to sandy soils (lower Fe content). In addition, the field moisture content is highly related to clay and Fe content. Thus, the response of XRF intensity to soil moisture content depends on soil texture and mineralogy. We could not find a general correction factor for soil moisture and X-ray intensity but the relationship between air-dried and field-moist Fe concentration is highly linear which allows to correct for moisture content by establishing an empirical correction function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bastos RO, Melquiades FL, Biasi GEV (2012) Correction for the effect of soil moisture on in situ XRF analysis using low-energy background. X-Ray Spectrom 41(5):304–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ge L, Lai W, Lin Y (2005) Influence of and correction for moisture in rocks, soils and sediments on in situ XRF analysis. X-Ray Spectrom 34:28–34. doi:10.1002/xrs.782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartemink AE, Minasny B (2014) Towards digital soil morphometrics. Geoderma 230–231:305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta A, Malone B, Stockmann U, Minasny B, Bishop TF, McBratney B, Pallasser R, Pozza L (2015) Potential of integrated field spectroscopy and spatial analysis for enhanced assessment of soil contamination: a prospective review. Geoderma 241–242:180–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hürkamp K, Raab T, Völkel J (2009) Two and three-dimensional quantification of lead contamination in alluvial soils of a historic mining area using field portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) analysis. Geomorphology 110(1):28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnicky DJ, Singhvi R (2001) Field portable XRF analysis of environmental samples. J Hazard Mater 83:93–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laiho JVP, Perämäki P (2005) Evaluation of portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) sample preparation methods. Special Paper of the Geological Survey of Finland 73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowicz AA (2008) Quantification and correction procedures. In: Potts PJ, West M (eds) Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: capabilities for in situ analysis. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 13–38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama Y, Ogawa K, Okada T, Kato M (2008) Laboratory experiments of particle size effect in X-ray fluorescence and implications to remote X-ray spectrometry of lunar regolith surface. Earth Planet Space 60:293–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons C, Grabulosa EM, Pili E, Floor GH, Roman-Ross G, Charlet L (2013) Quantification of trace arsenic in soils by field-portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: considerations for sample preparation and measurement conditions. J Hazard Mater 262:1213–1222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tjallingii R, Röhl U, Kölling M, Bickert T (2007) Influence of the water content on X‐ray fluorescence core‐scanning measurements in soft marine sediments. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 8(2)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uta Stockmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stockmann, U., Jang, H.J., Minasny, B., McBratney, A.B. (2016). The Effect of Soil Moisture and Texture on Fe Concentration Using Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometers. In: Hartemink, A., Minasny, B. (eds) Digital Soil Morphometrics. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28295-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics