Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (K sat) Derived from Image Analysis of Soil Thin Sections, Pedotransfer Functions, and Field-Measured Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Soil Morphometrics

Abstract

Saturated hydraulic conductivity (K sat) is an important soil parameter that governs water movement through horizons, pedons, and soil landscapes. K sat is infamous for its spatial and temporal variability, which contributes to the difficulty and considerable expense in measuring or otherwise quantifying it. Consequently, predictive methods such as pedotransfer functions (PTFs) that use physical soil properties, such as texture and bulk density, have been developed to derive K sat values. Soil texture and structure are key factors influencing K sat because of their direct relationship to pore size distribution. Quantitatively defining the combined effects of texture and structure on pore size distribution in a PTF is a difficult task. The objectives of this research were to: (i) estimate K sat based on pore characteristics derived from soil thin sections via image analysis; and (ii) compare the resultant values with field-measured K sat and with K sat estimated by a PTF using soil texture and bulk density parameters. We digitally scanned 39 thin sections from 11 pedons of soils derived from loess over till and/or over weathered sandstone. Soil voids were classified based on their size and shape. K sat was measured in the field using a Compact Constant-head Permeameter (Amoozemeter) and estimated using a Rosetta PTF. Simple and multiple linear regression (MLR) analyses were used to relate pore indexes and soil physical properties with measured and estimated K sat. The mean measured K sat was 0.74 cm h−1, whereas the PTF-estimated K sat from Rosetta and MLR were 0.36 cm h−1 and 0.49 cm h−1, respectively. The addition of pore characteristics into the model improved K sat predictions compared to predictions using Rosetta alone. The estimated K sat based on the model with added pore characteristics was better correlated with field-measured K sat (r = 0.82) than that based on Rosetta (r = 0.62). The addition of pore characteristics can improve K sat predictions. However, thin section void analysis from additional parent materials is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1976) An information criterion (AIC). Math Sci 14:5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoozegar A (1989) A compact constant-head permeameter for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity of the vadoze zone. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:1356–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoozegar A, Warrick AW (1986) Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils: field methods. In: A. Klute (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part I. Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd edn. Agronomy Series, vol. 9, American Society Agronomica, pp. 735–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson SH, Peyton RL, Gantzer CJ (1990) Evaluation of constructed and natural soil macropores using X-ray computed tomography. Geoderma 46:13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkle GF, Wöhling Th, Stenger R, Mertens J, Moorhead B, Wall A, Clague J (2010) Automated equilibrium tension lysimeters for measuring water fluxes through a layered, volcanic vadose profile in New Zealand. Vadose Zone J 10:747–759. doi:10.2136/vzj2010.0091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J (2006) Hydropedology as a powerful tool for environmental policy research. Geoderma 131:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J, Jongerius A, Boersma O, Jager A, Schoonderbeek D (1977) The function of different types of macropores during saturated flow through four swelling soil horizons. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:945–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J, Jongerius A, Schoonderbeek D (1979) Calculation of hydraulic conductivity using micromorphometric data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J, Jongmans AG, Stein A, Peek G (1989) Characterizing spatially variable hydraulic properties of a boulder clay deposit in The Netherlands. Geoderma 45:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2009) ArcGIS desktop: release 9. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzmaier DP, Steinhardt GC, Schulze DG (2004) Indiana soil and landscape evaluation manual, version 1.0. Purdue University, Agronomy Department

    Google Scholar 

  • Guber AK, Pachepsky YA, van Genuchten MTh, Rawls WJ, Simunek J, Jacques D, Nicholson TJ, Cady RE (2006) Field-scale water flow simulations using ensembles of pedotransfer functions for soil water retention. Vadose Zone J 5:234–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongerius A (1957) Morphologic investigations of soil structure. Bodemkundige Studies No. 2. Mededelingen van de Stickting voor Bodemkartering, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin H (2006) Temporal stability of soil moisture spatial pattern and subsurface preferential flow pathways in the Shale Hills catchment. Vadose Zone J 5(1):317–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie N, Jacquier D (1997) Improving the field estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity in soil survey. Aust J Soil Res 35(4):803–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty BP, Mousli Z (2000) Saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil water retention properties across a soil-slope transition. Water Resour Res 43(11):3311–3324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbaan RJ, Nijland HJ (1994) Determining the saturated hydraulic conductivity, chapter 12. In: Ritzema HP (ed) Drainage principles and applications. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Pub. 16, 2nd revised edn. Wageningen, The Netherlands, ISBN 90 70754 3 39

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachepsky YA, Gimenez D, Lilly A, Nemes A (2008) Promises of hydropedology. Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutri Nat Resour 3:2–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret JS, Prasher SO, Kantzas A, Langford C (1999) Three-dimensional quantification of macropore networks in undisturbed soil cores. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1530–1543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perret JS, Prasher SO, Kacomov AR (2003) Mass fractal dimension of soil macropores using computed tomography: From the box-counting to the cube-counting algorithm. Europ J Soil Sci 54:569–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyton RL, Haeffner BA, Anderson SH, Gantzer CJ (1992) Applying X-ray CT to measure macropore diameters in undisturbed soil cores. Geoderma 53:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyton RL, Gantzer CJ, Anderson SH, Haeffner BA, Pfeifer P (1994) Fractal dimension to describe soil macropore structure using X-ray computed tomography. Water Resour Res 30(3):691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds WD, Elrick DE (1985) In-situ measurement of field saturated hydraulic conductivity, sorptivity, and the a-parameter, using the Guelph permeameter. Soil Sci 140(4):292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell EW (1973) Soil conditions and plant growth, 10th edn. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2003) JMP®, Version 11.0.0. Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap MG (1999) Rosetta (http://www.ussl.ars.usda.gov/MODELS/rosetta/rosetta.htm)

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MTh (1998) Neural network analysis for hierarchical prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:847–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Division Staff (1993) Soil survey manual. Soil conservation service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson KW, Luxmoore RJ (1986) Estimating macroporsity in a forest watershed by use of a tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:578–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White RE (1985) The influence of macropores on the transport of dissolved and suspended matter through soil. Adv Soil Sci 3:95–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingard RC, Bernard JR, Coulter GW, Hudson GL (1980) Soil survey of Dubois County, Indiana. United States Department of Agriculture, National Cooperative Soil Survey. U.S. Government Printing Office 299-473/87, 117 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zamir Libohova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland (outside the USA)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Libohova, Z. et al. (2016). Comparative Analysis of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (K sat) Derived from Image Analysis of Soil Thin Sections, Pedotransfer Functions, and Field-Measured Methods. In: Hartemink, A., Minasny, B. (eds) Digital Soil Morphometrics. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28295-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics