Abstract
The concept of quality of life is necessarily vague. The meaning of the term is often dependent on the user and the population or individual under consideration. Many have tried to define it and measure it, though no consensus view on what it means or how it should be assessed has emerged. Often in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions, it is restricted to mean health-related quality of life, though even this leaves a yawning chasm from which significant debate arises. This is no different when researchers turn their attention to measuring and valuing the quality of life of children or those at the end of life. There exist important differences between children and adults that affect the ways in which we must understand and measure health-related quality of life. These include important physical and cognitive differences between children and adults, differences in the types and severity of illnesses that affect children and methodological and ethical issues related to conducting research in children. This chapter provides an overview of the difficulties in measuring and valuing paediatric quality of life, with a particular emphasis on doing so in populations of children with terminal or life-limiting illnesses. It raises a number of questions researchers should ask themselves when deciding how to measure quality of life for the purposes of economic evaluation in children with life-limiting illnesses, in particular, what domains of health should be measured, who should undertake the measurement and using which instrument.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bowling A (2009) Measuring disease: a review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham
Stevens K (2009) Developing a descriptive system for a new preference-based measure of health-related quality of life for children. Qual Life Res 18(8):1105–1113
Harris M, Butterworth G (2002) Developmental psychology: a student’s handbook. Taylor & Francis Ltd, New York
Matza LS, Swensen AR, Flood EM, Secnik K, Leidy NK (2004) Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: a review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health 7(1):79–92
Aristotle (1982) Eudemian ethics. In: Woods M (ed) Aristotle’s eudemian ethics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp EE 1214b30–EE 1214b36
Ratcliffe J, Flynn T, Terlich F, Stevens K, Brazier J, Sawyer M (2012) Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D. Pharmacoeconomics 30(8):713–727
Stevens KJ (2010) Working with children to develop dimensions for a preference-based, generic, pediatric, health-related quality-of-life measure. Qual Health Res 20(3):340–351
Petrou S (2003) Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children. Health Econ 12(8):697–702
Landgraf J, Abetz L (1996) Measuring health outcomes in pediatric populations: issues in psychometrics and applications. In: Spiker B (ed) Quality of life in pharmacoeconomics and clinical trials, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 793–802
Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35(11):1095–1108
Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M (2002) The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21(2):271–292
United Nations Childrens Fund FACT SHEET: a summary of the rights under the convention on the rights of the child. 19-5-2014. United Nations. 23-6-2015. Ref Type: Online Source
Huang IC, Shenkman EA, Madden VL, Vadaparampil S, Quinn G, Knapp CA (2010) Measuring quality of life in pediatric palliative care: challenges and potential solutions. Palliat Med 24(2):175–182
Kaplan RM, Anderson JP (1988) The quality of well-being scale: rationale for a single quality of life index. In: Walker S, Rosse R (eds) Quality of life: assessment and application. MTP Press, London, pp 51–77
Cadman D, Goldsmith C, Torrance G, Boyle M, Furlong W (1986) Development of a health status index for Ontario children. McMaster University, Hamilton
Apajasalo M, Sintonen H, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H et al (1996) Quality of life in early adolescence: a sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D). Qual Life Res 5(2):205–211
Apajasalo M, Rautonen J, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H et al (1996) Quality of life in pre-adolescence: a 17-dimensional health-related measure (17D). Qual Life Res 5(6):532–538
Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37(1):53–72
Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, Burstrom K, Cavrini G, Devlin N et al (2010) Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 19(6):875–886
Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, Burstrom K, Cavrini G et al (2010) Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Qual Life Res 19(6):887–897
Moodie M, Richardson J, Rankin B, Iezzi A, Sinha K (2010) Predicting time trade-off health state valuations of adolescents in four Pacific countries using the Assessment of Quality-of-Life (AQoL-6D) instrument. Value Health 13(8):1014–1027
Beusterien KM, Yeung JE, Pang F, Brazier J (2012) Development of the multi-attribute Adolescent Health Utility Measure (AHUM). Health Qual Life Outcomes 10:102
Stevens K (2011) Assessing the performance of a new generic measure of health-related quality of life for children and refining it for use in health state valuation. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 9(3):157–169
McColl E (2005) Developing questionnaires. In: Fayers P, Hays R (eds) Assessing quality of life in clinical trials, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–23
Eiser C, Morse R (2001) Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess 5(4):1–157
Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon J, Tsuchiya A (2007) Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dobrez DG, Calhoun EA (2004) Testing subject comprehension of utility questionnaires. Qual Life Res 13(2):369–376
Ratcliffe J, Couzner L, Flynn T, Sawyer M, Stevens K, Brazier J et al (2011) Valuing child health utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 9(1):15–27
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London
Dolan P, Shaw R, Tsuchiya A, Williams A (2005) QALY maximisation and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Econ 14(2):197–208
Lewis PA, Charny M (1989) Which of two individuals do you treat when only their ages are different and you can’t treat both? J Med Ethics 15(1):28–34
Baker R, Bateman I, Donaldson C, Jones-Lee M, Lancsar E, Loomes G, Mason H, Odejar M, Pinto Prades JL, Robinson A, Ryan M, Shackley P, Smith R, Sugden R, Wildman J (2010) Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project. Health Technol Assess 14(27). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hta14270
Wailoo A, Tsuchiya A, McCabe C (2009) Weighting must wait: incorporating equity concerns into cost-effectiveness analysis may take longer than expected. Pharmacoeconomics 27(12):983–989
Karl C, Steve M, Marta S, Nigel R, Eldon S, Sebastian H, Nancy D, Peter CS, Mark S (2015) Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold Health Technology Assessment, No. 19.14, Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library
Chen G, Ratcliffe J (2015) A review of the development and application of generic multi-attribute utility instruments for paediatric populations. Pharmacoeconomics 33:1013–1028
van Stel HF, Buskens E (2006) Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:20
McCrone P, Patel A, Knapp M, Schene A, Koeter M, Amaddeo F et al (2009) A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia. J Ment Health Policy Econ 12(1):27–31
Round J, Sampson EL, Jones L (2013) A framework for understanding quality of life in individuals without capacity. Qual Life Res 23:477–484
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stevens, K., Round, J. (2016). Measuring and Valuing Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Terminal and Life-Limiting Illness. In: Round, J. (eds) Care at the End of Life. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28267-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28267-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Adis, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28266-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28267-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)