Skip to main content

Measuring and Valuing Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Terminal and Life-Limiting Illness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Care at the End of Life
  • 697 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of quality of life is necessarily vague. The meaning of the term is often dependent on the user and the population or individual under consideration. Many have tried to define it and measure it, though no consensus view on what it means or how it should be assessed has emerged. Often in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions, it is restricted to mean health-related quality of life, though even this leaves a yawning chasm from which significant debate arises. This is no different when researchers turn their attention to measuring and valuing the quality of life of children or those at the end of life. There exist important differences between children and adults that affect the ways in which we must understand and measure health-related quality of life. These include important physical and cognitive differences between children and adults, differences in the types and severity of illnesses that affect children and methodological and ethical issues related to conducting research in children. This chapter provides an overview of the difficulties in measuring and valuing paediatric quality of life, with a particular emphasis on doing so in populations of children with terminal or life-limiting illnesses. It raises a number of questions researchers should ask themselves when deciding how to measure quality of life for the purposes of economic evaluation in children with life-limiting illnesses, in particular, what domains of health should be measured, who should undertake the measurement and using which instrument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bowling A (2009) Measuring disease: a review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stevens K (2009) Developing a descriptive system for a new preference-based measure of health-related quality of life for children. Qual Life Res 18(8):1105–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris M, Butterworth G (2002) Developmental psychology: a student’s handbook. Taylor & Francis Ltd, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matza LS, Swensen AR, Flood EM, Secnik K, Leidy NK (2004) Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: a review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health 7(1):79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aristotle (1982) Eudemian ethics. In: Woods M (ed) Aristotle’s eudemian ethics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp EE 1214b30–EE 1214b36

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ratcliffe J, Flynn T, Terlich F, Stevens K, Brazier J, Sawyer M (2012) Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D. Pharmacoeconomics 30(8):713–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens KJ (2010) Working with children to develop dimensions for a preference-based, generic, pediatric, health-related quality-of-life measure. Qual Health Res 20(3):340–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Petrou S (2003) Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children. Health Econ 12(8):697–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Landgraf J, Abetz L (1996) Measuring health outcomes in pediatric populations: issues in psychometrics and applications. In: Spiker B (ed) Quality of life in pharmacoeconomics and clinical trials, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 793–802

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35(11):1095–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M (2002) The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21(2):271–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. United Nations Childrens Fund FACT SHEET: a summary of the rights under the convention on the rights of the child. 19-5-2014. United Nations. 23-6-2015. Ref Type: Online Source

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang IC, Shenkman EA, Madden VL, Vadaparampil S, Quinn G, Knapp CA (2010) Measuring quality of life in pediatric palliative care: challenges and potential solutions. Palliat Med 24(2):175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan RM, Anderson JP (1988) The quality of well-being scale: rationale for a single quality of life index. In: Walker S, Rosse R (eds) Quality of life: assessment and application. MTP Press, London, pp 51–77

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cadman D, Goldsmith C, Torrance G, Boyle M, Furlong W (1986) Development of a health status index for Ontario children. McMaster University, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  16. Apajasalo M, Sintonen H, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H et al (1996) Quality of life in early adolescence: a sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D). Qual Life Res 5(2):205–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Apajasalo M, Rautonen J, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H et al (1996) Quality of life in pre-adolescence: a 17-dimensional health-related measure (17D). Qual Life Res 5(6):532–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37(1):53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, Burstrom K, Cavrini G, Devlin N et al (2010) Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 19(6):875–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, Burstrom K, Cavrini G et al (2010) Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Qual Life Res 19(6):887–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moodie M, Richardson J, Rankin B, Iezzi A, Sinha K (2010) Predicting time trade-off health state valuations of adolescents in four Pacific countries using the Assessment of Quality-of-Life (AQoL-6D) instrument. Value Health 13(8):1014–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Beusterien KM, Yeung JE, Pang F, Brazier J (2012) Development of the multi-attribute Adolescent Health Utility Measure (AHUM). Health Qual Life Outcomes 10:102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stevens K (2011) Assessing the performance of a new generic measure of health-related quality of life for children and refining it for use in health state valuation. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 9(3):157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McColl E (2005) Developing questionnaires. In: Fayers P, Hays R (eds) Assessing quality of life in clinical trials, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–23

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eiser C, Morse R (2001) Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess 5(4):1–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon J, Tsuchiya A (2007) Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dobrez DG, Calhoun EA (2004) Testing subject comprehension of utility questionnaires. Qual Life Res 13(2):369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ratcliffe J, Couzner L, Flynn T, Sawyer M, Stevens K, Brazier J et al (2011) Valuing child health utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 9(1):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dolan P, Shaw R, Tsuchiya A, Williams A (2005) QALY maximisation and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Econ 14(2):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lewis PA, Charny M (1989) Which of two individuals do you treat when only their ages are different and you can’t treat both? J Med Ethics 15(1):28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Baker R, Bateman I, Donaldson C, Jones-Lee M, Lancsar E, Loomes G, Mason H, Odejar M, Pinto Prades JL, Robinson A, Ryan M, Shackley P, Smith R, Sugden R, Wildman J (2010) Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project. Health Technol Assess 14(27). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hta14270

  33. Wailoo A, Tsuchiya A, McCabe C (2009) Weighting must wait: incorporating equity concerns into cost-effectiveness analysis may take longer than expected. Pharmacoeconomics 27(12):983–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Karl C, Steve M, Marta S, Nigel R, Eldon S, Sebastian H, Nancy D, Peter CS, Mark S (2015) Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold Health Technology Assessment, No. 19.14, Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen G, Ratcliffe J (2015) A review of the development and application of generic multi-attribute utility instruments for paediatric populations. Pharmacoeconomics 33:1013–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. van Stel HF, Buskens E (2006) Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. McCrone P, Patel A, Knapp M, Schene A, Koeter M, Amaddeo F et al (2009) A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia. J Ment Health Policy Econ 12(1):27–31

    Google Scholar 

  38. Round J, Sampson EL, Jones L (2013) A framework for understanding quality of life in individuals without capacity. Qual Life Res 23:477–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Stevens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stevens, K., Round, J. (2016). Measuring and Valuing Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Terminal and Life-Limiting Illness. In: Round, J. (eds) Care at the End of Life. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28267-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics