Skip to main content

REDD+ and Carbon Markets: The Ethiopian Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Forest Ecosystems: The Challenge of Climate Change

Part of the book series: Managing Forest Ecosystems ((MAFE,volume 34))

Abstract

In 1997, the Parties to the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) adopted the Kyoto Protocol to operationalise the UNFCCC by committing countries included in its Annex 1 (industrialised countries and countries with economies in transition) to emissions reductions targets and establishing mechanisms to achieve those targets. A new commodity was created in the form of emission reductions or removals. Carbon (carbon dioxide) is now tracked and traded like any other commodity. Carbon markets are means by which contracts of sale of emission reductions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) are exchanged. Complexity in the operation of these carbon markets has been increasing day by day, with different mechanisms, programs and assets.

REDD + mechanism (Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation , sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries) incentivizes a trend change from historic increasing deforestation rates and greenhouse gases emissions. Through REDD+ mechanism developing countries are financially granted for any emissions reductions achieved associated with a decrease in the conversion of forests to alternative land uses.

With more than 18 million hectares of forests (including woodlands , Ethiopian Mapping Agency 2013) covering approximately 16 % of its land area, Ethiopia has a huge potential and is among the countries partnered with FCPF (Forest Carbon Partnership Facility) to implement REDD+.

The REDD+ process is framed in the Ethiopia’s Climate Resilience Green Economy (CRGE) Strategy that sets out that by 2025, Ethiopia will become a middle-income country, resilient to climate change impacts and with a zero net increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions over 2010 levels. REDD+ strategy contributes to the achievement of the CRGE targets through improved management of forests and agricultural areas. This strategy will be followed by a comprehensive action plan that elaborates the required activities to address the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation . The action plan will be incorporated into the Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP II) and implemented by the relevant sectors in line with existing sectoral policies and strategies.

An approach to the complexity of carbon markets and to the key mitigation program in the forestry sector through the process initiated in Ethiopia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    6 greenhouse gases are included in the Annex A to the Kyoto Protocol; Carbon dioxide (C02), Methane (CH4), Nitrous oxide (N20), Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)

  2. 2.

    Art. 12 KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE, 1998.

  3. 3.

    This new version also included an important change in the nomenclature of the standard: VCS was renamed as ‘Verified Carbon Standard’ instead of ‘Voluntary Carbon Standard’.

  4. 4.

    1 GtC = 1 Gigatonne of carbon = 1015 grams of carbon and it corresponds to 3.667 GtCO2.

  5. 5.

    Forest Reference Emission Levels or Forest Reference Levels (if emissions by sources and removals by sinks are both considered) are benchmarks for assessing country’s performance in implementing REDD+ activities. Through the analysis of historic emissions during a reference period, a linear trend extrapolation or a historic average (e.g.) could be projected and used as benchmark for measuring emission reductions from REDD+ activities during a specified period (Decision 12/COP17).

  6. 6.

    Carbon Fund. Methodological Framework. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. December 20, 2013.

  7. 7.

    VCS Methodology VM0007 REDD+ Methodology Framework (REDD-MF). March 9, 2015.

References

  • Baker A, Mc Kenzie A (2014) The consolidated guide to the REDD+ rules under the UNFCCC, 100 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Denier L, Korwin S, Leggett M, MacFarquhar C (2014) The little book of legal frameworks for REDD+. Global Canopy Programme, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis K, Baker B, Lemma A (2009) Policies for low carbon growth. Overseas Development Institute, London, 81pp

    Google Scholar 

  • [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010. Main Report. FAO Forestry Paper 163. Rome, 378 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • [FDRE] Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (2006) Ethiopia: building on progress: a Plan for Accelerated and Sustained Development to End Poverty (PASDEP) 2005/06–2009/10. Volume II. Ministry of Finance and Economic Development CRGE, 2011, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • [FDRE] Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (2010a) Growth and transformation plan 2010/11–2014/15.Volume I: Main text. Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, FDRE, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • [FDRE] Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (2010b) Carbon Neutral Climate Resilient Economy (CNCRE). How Ethiopia is responding to climate change? To build a carbon neutral climate resilient economy. 34 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • [FDRE] Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (2011a) Ethiopia’s climate-resilient green economy: green economy strategy. FDRE, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • [FDRE] Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (2011b) Programme of Adaptation to Climate Change (EPACC). FDRE, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • [FDRE] Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (2011c) Readiness preparation proposal. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • [IPCC] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, 1535 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kill J, Ozinga S, Pavett S, Wainwright R (2010) Trading carbon: how it works and why it is controversial. FERN publication, Moreton in Marsh, 118 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacha MJ (2015) Community-based monitoring, reporting and verification. Know-How: Sharing Knowledge From Practice. WWF Report. FCP. 2015,42 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautner M, Lawrence L, Bregman T, Leggett M (2015) The forest 500. Global Canopy Programme, Oxford, 7 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeberg-Elverfeldt C (2010) Carbon finance possibilities for agriculture, forestry and other land use projects in a smallholder context. Environment and Natural Resources Management Working Paper, 34. Natural Resources Management and Environment Department. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, 2010, 38 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • [UN] United Nations (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). FCCC/INFORMAL/84. GE.05–62220 (E) 200705. New York, USA, 24 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • [UN] United Nations (1998) Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Kyoto, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers B, Trines E, Pohnan E (2012) Community guidelines for accessing forestry voluntary carbon markets. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, 196 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • [WB] World Bank (2010) State and trends of carbon pricing 2010. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • [WB] World Bank (2014) State and trends of carbon pricing 2014. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been prepared with the support of the donors of the REDD+ activities in Ethiopia: Norwegian Government (Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative; NICFI), the Government of and UK Department for International Development (DfID) and the World Bank’s Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), and all stakeholders involved in the various Task Forces.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Gonzalo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gonzalo, J., Zewdie, S., Tenkir, E., Moges, Y. (2017). REDD+ and Carbon Markets: The Ethiopian Process. In: Bravo, F., LeMay, V., Jandl, R. (eds) Managing Forest Ecosystems: The Challenge of Climate Change. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28250-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics