Skip to main content

History of Ethnobiology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Ethnobiology

Abstract

The history of ethnobiology has been addressed by different authors to portray the development of the discipline, its main authors, and its theoretical and methodological approaches, challenges, gaps, and perspectives. At first, ethnobiological studies were characterized by more descriptive approaches and by the documentation of the uses of plants and animals. Currently, it is considered that ethnobiology is in its interdisciplinary stage, where a greater cooperation among researchers from different areas is sought in order to handle more complex problems that can affect biological and cultural diversity. In this chapter, we briefly review the history of ethnobiology starting with the characterization of its stages, its main authors, and prospects for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The emic perspective represents the worldview of indigenous/traditional peoples regarding natural resources (e.g., names and descriptions of species and natural phenomena), as opposed to the ethical perspective, which is the researchers’ interpretation of these phenomena. To learn more about the emic/ethic distinction, see Batalha (1998).

References

  • Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM (2013) What is evolutionary ethnobiology? Ethnobiol Conserv 2(6):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque UP, Silva JS, Campos JLA et al (2013) The current status of ethnobiological research in Latin America: gaps and perspectives. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 9:72

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EN (2011) Ethnobiology: overview of a growing field. In: Anderson EN, Pearsall D, Hunn E, Turner N (eds) Ethnobiology. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp 1–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Bassols N, Toledo VM (2005) Ethnoecology of the Yucatec Maya: symbolism, knowledge and management of natural resources. J Lat Am Geogr 4(1):9–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batalha L (1998) Emics/Etics revisitado: “nativo” e “antropólogo” lutam pela última palavra. Etnográfica 2(2):319–343, http://ceas.iscte.pt/etnografica/1998_02_02.php. Accessed 28 Apr 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Begossi A (1996) Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany: diversity indices. Econ Bot 50(3):280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clément D (1998) The historical foundations of Ethnobiology (1860–1899). J Ethnobiol 18(2):161–187

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrosio U (2014) Theoretical reflections on ethnobiology in the third millennium. Contrib Sci 10:49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidayati S, Franco FM, Bussmann RW (2015) Ready for phase 5—current status of ethnobiology in Southeast Asia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 11(17):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunn E (2007) Ethnobiology in four phases. J Ethnobiol 27(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Society of Ethnobiology (2014) ISE history. http://www.ethnobiology.net/what-we-do/ise-history/. Accessed 08 Jan 2014

  • Medeiros MFT (2014) Procedures for documentary analysis in the establishment of ethnobiological information. In: Albuquerque UP, Lucena RFP, Cunha LVFC, Alves RRN (eds) Methods and techniques in ethnobiological and ethnoecological research, Springer Protocols Handbooks. Springer, New York, pp 75–85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros MFT, Albuquerque UP (2014) Food flora in 17th century northeast region of Brazil in Historia Naturalis Brasiliae. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 10(1):50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros MFT, Albuquerque UP (2012) The pharmacy of the Benedictine monks: The use of medicinal plants in Northeast Brazil during the nineteenth century (1823-1829). J Ethnopharmacol 139:280-286

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips O, Gentry AH (1993) The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru I. Statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Econ Bot 47(l):15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM, Alarcón-Cháires P (2012) La Etnoecología hoy: panorama, avances, desafios. Etnoecológica 9(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton S (2013) Ethnobiology 5: interdisciplinarity in an era of rapid environmental change. Ethnobiol Lett 4:21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton S, Chambers KJ, Veteto JR (2014a) Climate change and ethnobiology. J Ethnobiol 34(3):273–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton S, Nolan JM, Ahmed W (2014b) Ethnobiology, political ecology, and conservation. J Ethnobiol 34(2):125–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Sobral .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sobral, A., Albuquerque, U.P. (2016). History of Ethnobiology. In: Albuquerque, U., Nóbrega Alves, R. (eds) Introduction to Ethnobiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28155-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics