Skip to main content

Fundamentals of Medical Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual Ethics of Surgical Innovation
  • 504 Accesses

Abstract

It is practically impossible to go through medical training, or even just to be around the medical field, without a discussion or two along the way about the proper course of action in a difficult medical situation. The challenging medical ethical questions are legion. The pressure of time may drive one past the initial questions of how to arrive at an answer to an ethical dilemma on to the concluding question, “What should we do?” This chapter is about those initial questions and asks what are some of the principles involved and what is a process that can be used to arrive at the answer to a difficult medical ethical challenge. In short, it is on the fundamentals of medical ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Frankena WK. Ethics. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1963. p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor PW. Principles of ethics: an introduction. Belmont: Wadsworth; 1975. p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baura GD. Engineering ethics: an industrial perspective. New York: Elsevier; 2006. p. 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kant I. Groundwork of metaphysic of morals. Trans. H. J. Paton. New York: Harper Perennial; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tobriner MO. Majority Opinion in Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. California Supreme Court; July 1, 1976. 131 California Reporter 14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark WP. Dissenting Opinion in Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. California Supreme Court; July 1, 1976. 131 California Reporter 14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington: DHEW Publication; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maclean A. Autonomy, informed consent and medical law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beauchamp TL, Walters LR. Contemporary issues in bioethics. 6th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth; 2003. p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Naugle DK. Worldview: the history of a concept. Michigan: Eerdmans; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur L. Rawlings .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rawlings, A.L. (2016). Fundamentals of Medical Ethics. In: Stain, S., Pryor, A., Shadduck, P. (eds) The SAGES Manual Ethics of Surgical Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27663-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27663-2_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27661-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27663-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics