Skip to main content

Social Media for Government Services: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Media for Government Services

Abstract

Government agencies and departments all over the world have started using various forms of social media for different purposes. Though the use of social media in public sectors is increasing, the adoption path is not easy and straightforward. Furthermore, in many situations, the use is still in an infancy stage when it is measured against pre-set objectives. The aim of this chapter is multiple folds. The chapter first provides a brief introduction of social media and types of social media. It then describes the adoption process in government. This is followed by some example applications where social media has been successfully used. A few key challenges that are proven to be difficult in adopting social media are given. Finally, the chapter provides a framework to define guidelines and policies to overcome these challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.govtech.com/public-safety/Social-Media-Big-Lessons-from-the-Boston-Marathon-Bombing.html.

  2. 2.

    http://pttemergency.pixnet.net/blog.

  3. 3.

    See, for example: http://social-media-for-development.org/nepal-earthquake-how-social-media-has-been-used-in-the-aftermath/.

  4. 4.

    http://cpd.org.au/2009/09/case-study-public-sphere-as-a-gov-2-0-example-of-open-government/—accessed September 29th, 2015.

  5. 5.

    http://www.futuremelbourne.com.au/wiki/view/FMPlan.

  6. 6.

    http://www.ning.com/.

  7. 7.

    See, for example, “lessons learnt” from the FutureMelbourne experiment: http://www.futuremelbourne.com.au/wiki/pub/FMPlan/WebHome/Future_Melbourne_Wiki_Post_Implementation_.pdf— accessed September 29th, 2015, or the experience of the Australian Department for Human Services in Chap. 2.

References

  1. Leonardi, P. M., Huysman, M., & Steinfield, C. (2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamel Boulos, M. N., & Wheeler, S. (2007). The emerging web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education1. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24, 2–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bercovici, J. (2010). Who coined “social media”? Web pioneers compete for credit,”. Forbes. Disponível.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aghaei, S., Nematbakhsh, M. A., & Farsani, H. K. (2012). Evolution of the world wide web: from Web 1.0 to Web 4.0. International Journal of Web and Semantic Technology, 3, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Administration U.S.G.S. (2009). GSA social media policy. GSA Publication no. CIO 2106.1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54, 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zlatić, V., Ghoshal, G., & Caldarelli, G. (2009). Hypergraph topological quantities for tagged social networks. Physical Review E, 80, 036118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Schmitz, C., & Stumme, G. (2006). BibSonomy: A social bookmark and publication sharing system. In Proceedings of the Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (pp. 87–102).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lerman, K. (2007). User participation in social media: Digg study. In IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology Workshops (pp. 255–258). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wetzker, R., Zimmermann, C., & Bauckhage, C. (2008). Analyzing social bookmarking systems: A del. icio. us cookbook. In Proceedings of the ECAI 2008 Mining Social Data Workshop (pp. 26–30).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chan, A. J. (2002). Collaborative news networks: Distributed editing, collective action, and the construction of online news on Slashdot. org. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davidson, J., Liebald, B., Liu, J., Nandy, P., Van Vleet, T., & Gargi, U. et al. (2010). The YouTube video recommendation system. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (pp. 293–296). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sigurbjörnsson, B., & Van Zwol, R. (2008). Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 327–336). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis (pp. 56–65). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chang, Y., Tang, L., Inagaki, Y., & Liu, Y. (2014). What is tumblr: A statistical overview and comparison. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 16, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bei, J. (2013). How Chinese journalists use Weibo microblogging for investigative reporting. Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Regan, K. (2002). Epinions: An E-commerce Success that Almost Wasn’t’. E-commerce Times, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mergel, I., & Bretschneider, S. I. (2013). A three-stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Administration Review, 73, 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mergel, I. (2013). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the US federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Magro, M. J. (2012). A review of social media use in e-government. Administrative Sciences, 2, 148–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mainka, A., Hartmann, S., Stock, W. G., & Peters, I. (2014). Government and social media: A case study of 31 informational world cities. In 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1715–1724). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abdelsalam, H. M., Reddick, C. G., Gamal, S., & Al-shaar, A. (2013). Social media in Egyptian government websites: Presence, usage, and effectiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 406–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuzma, J. (2010). Asian government usage of Web 2.0 social media. European Journal of ePractice 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bird, D., Ling, M., & Haynes, K. (2012). Flooding Facebook-the use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yates, D., & Paquette, S. (2011). Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao, H., Barbier, G., & Goolsby, R. (2011). Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. IEEE Intelligent Systems 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang, C.-M., Chan, E., & Hyder, A. A. (2010). Web 2.0 and internet social networking: A new tool for disaster management? Lessons from Taiwan. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10, 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dufty, N. (2012). Using social media to build community disaster resilience. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management (peer reviewed), 27, 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sensis: Sensis Social Media Report. (2015). How Australian People and Businesses are Using Social Media. https://www.sensis.com.au/content/dam/sas/PDFdirectory/Sensis_Social_Media_Report_2015.pdf

  32. Bregman, S. (2012). Uses of social media in public transportation. Transportation Research Board. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_syn_99.pdf

  33. Bregman, S., & Watkins, K. E. (2013). Best practices for transportation agency use of social media. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kaufman, S. M. (2012). How social media moves New York: Twitter use by transportation providers in the New York region. http://wagner.nyu.edu/rudincenter/publication/how-social-media-moves-new-york-twitter-use-by-transportation-providers-in-the-new-york-region-2/

  35. Bittle, S., Haller, C., & Kadlec, A. (2009). Promising practices in online engagement. Occasional paper. http://www.publicagenda.org/files/PA_CAPE_Paper3_Promising_Mech2.pdf

  36. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Toland, J. (2011). E-petitions in local government: The case of Wellington city council. International Reports on Socio-Informatics (IRSI). Bodker et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 2011 Community and Technology (C&T 2011) Workshop on Government and Citizen Engagement 8(2) (pp. 15–22).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fredericks, J., & Foth, M. (2013). Augmenting public participation: Enhancing planning outcomes through the use of social media and web 2.0. Australian Planner, 50, 244–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cottica, A., & Bianchi, T. (2010). Harnessing the unexpected: A public administration interacts with creatives on the web. European Journal of ePractice, 9, 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Charalabidis, Y., Triantafillou, A., Karkaletsis, V., & Loukis, E. (2012). Public policy formulation through non moderated crowdsourcing in social media. In Electronic participation (pp. 156–169). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Danju, I., Maasoglu, Y., & Maasoglu, N. (2013). From autocracy to democracy: The impact of social media on the transformation process in North Africa and Middle East. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 678–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ghannam, J. (2011). Social media in the Arab world: Leading up to the uprisings of 2011. Center for International Media Assistance 3. http://www.cima.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/CIMA-Arab_Social_Media-Report-10-25-11.pdf

  43. Mayfield III, T. D. (2011). A commander’s strategy for social media. DTIC Document. http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA535374

  44. Kes-Erkul, A., & Erkul, R. E. (2009). Web 2.0 in the process of e-participation: The case of organizing for America and the Obama administration. University of Massachusetts-Amherst, National Center for Digital Government. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=ncdg

  45. Sweetser, K. D., & Lariscy, W. (2008). Candidates make good friends: An analysis of candidates’ uses of Facebook. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2, 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. The Washington Post. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/11/obama-raised-half-a-billion-on.html

  47. Williams, C., & Gulati, G. J. (2009). Facebook grows up: An empirical assessment of its role in the 2008 congressional elections. In Proceedings of Midwest Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mascaro, C. M., & Goggins, S. P. (2011). Challenges for national civic engagement in the United States. International Reports on Socio-Informatics (IRSI). Bodker et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 2011 Community and Technology (C&T 2011) Workshop on Government and Citizen Engagement 8(2).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sobaci, M. Z., & Karkin, N. (2013). The use of twitter by mayors in Turkey: Tweets for better public services? Government Information Quarterly, 30, 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kirkpatrick, M. (2010). Facebook’s Zuckerberg says the age of privacy is over. http://readwrite.com/2010/01/09/facebooks_zuckerberg_says_the_age_of_privacy_is_ov

  52. Madden, M. (2012). Privacy management on social media sites. Pew Internet Report 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, Y., Leon, P. G., Scott, K., Chen, X., Acquisti, A., & Cranor, L. F. (2013). Privacy nudges for social media: an exploratory Facebook study. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (pp. 763–770). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, Y., Norcie, G., Komanduri, S., Acquisti, A., Leon, P. G., & Cranor, L. F. (2011). I regretted the minute I pressed share: A qualitative study of regrets on Facebook. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (p. 10). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lipford, H. R., Besmer, A., & Watson, J. (2008). Understanding privacy settings in Facebook with an audience view. UPSEC, 8, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wang, N., Xu, H., & Grossklags, J. (2011). Third-party apps on Facebook: Privacy and the illusion of control. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Symposium on Computer Human Interaction for Management of Information Technology (p. 4). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hrdinová, J., Helbig, N., & Peters, C. S. (2010). Designing social media policy for government: Eight essential elements. Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Jaeger, P. T., Bertot, J. C., & Shilton, K. (2012). Information policy and social media: Framing government—citizen web 2.0 interactions. In Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance (pp. 11–25). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government information quarterly, 29, 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 492–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bryer, T. A. (2011). The costs of democratization: Social media adaptation challenges within government agencies. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 33, 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surya Nepal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nepal, S., Paris, C., Georgeakopoulos, D. (2015). Social Media for Government Services: An Introduction. In: Nepal, S., Paris, C., Georgakopoulos, D. (eds) Social Media for Government Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27237-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27237-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27235-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27237-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics