Skip to main content

Diagnostic Approach to Müllerian Anomalies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Congenital Müllerian Anomalies

Abstract

The diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies can be challenging. Appropriate and timely diagnosis may have profound effects on long-term quality of life, future fertility, and obstetrical outcomes. While most congenital obstructive malformations are detected during adolescence as a result of amenorrhea, dysmenorrhea, or pelvic pain, diagnosis of nonobstructive uterine anomalies may be delayed until fertility is compromised or obstetrical complications occur. A detailed history provides important data regarding syndromes associated with aberrant Müllerian duct formation, the chronicity of pubertal milestones, sexual functioning, and reproductive outcomes, while the physical examination allows for anatomical identification of lower genital tract abnormalities. In girls with Müllerian defects, imaging studies augment the physical findings and allow for a clearer understanding of the internal reproductive organs. Additionally, pelvic imaging is specifically valuable in distinguishing idiopathic dysmenorrhea from functional or structural causes of pelvic pain. Furthermore, precise imaging can help guide accurate surgical intervention. Genetic testing may be useful as an adjunct to understanding structural defects associated with disorders of sex development and other genetic syndromes. This chapter will provide a comprehensive approach to diagnosis of obstructive and nonobstructive congenital anomalies of the Müllerian ducts and other related congenital anomalies of the reproductive tract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacLaughlin DT, Donahoe PK. Sex determination and differentiation. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(3):306.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee PA, Houk CP, Ahmed SF, Hughes IA. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):e488–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammound AO, Gibson M, Peterson CM, Kerber RA, Mineau G, Hatasaka H. Quantification of the familial contribution to Müllerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:378–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moshiri M et al. Evaluation and management of disorders of sex development: multidisciplinary approach to a complex diagnosis. Radiographics. 2012;32(6):1599–618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dhombres F et al. Contribution of prenatal imaging to the anatomical assessment of fetal hydrocolpos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(1):101–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Di Nola G, Franchi D, Candiani GB. Endometriosis and nonobstructive Müllerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(4):515–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oppelt P et al. The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnexa associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1493–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sajjad Y. Development of the genital ducts and external genitalia in the early human embryo. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(5):929–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimberley N, Hutson JM, Southwell BR, Grover SR. Vaginal agenesis, the hymen, and associated anomalies. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25(1):54–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pittock ST, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Lteif A. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser anomaly and its associated malformations. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;135(3):314–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wester T, Tovar JA, Rintala RJ. Vaginal agenesis or distal vaginal atresia associated with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(3):571–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Breech LL, Laufer MR. Mullerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2009;36(1):47–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Daoub A, Drake TM. Congenital abnormalities of the urogenital tract: the clue is in the cord? BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Current evaluation of amenorrhea. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):S219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Emans SJ, Laufer MR, Goldstein DP. Amenorrhea in the adolescent. In: Pediatric and adolescent gynecology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 214–22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for adolescent healthcare. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chervenak F, Stangel J, Nemee M, Amin H. Mayer Rokitansky Kuster Hauser syndrome. N Y State J Med. 1982;82:23–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabdia S, Sutton B, Kimble RMN. The obstructed hemivagina, ipsilateral renal anomaly, and uterine didelphys triad and the subsequent manifestation of cervical aplasia. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014;27:375–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dietrich JE, Millar DM, Quint EH. Non-obstructive Mullerian anomalies. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014;27:386–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dietrich JE, Millar DM, Quint EH. Obstructive reproductive tract anomalies. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014;27:396–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gidwani G, Falcone T. Congenital malformations of the female genital tract. In: Diagnosis and management. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 145–68.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Christianson MS, Yates MM, Woo I, Khafagy A, Garcia JE, Kolp LA. Obstructed Hemivagina Ipsilateral Renal Anomaly (OHVIRA): diagnostic features and management of a frequently misdiagnosed syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):S222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wozniakowska E. Delayed diagnosis of Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome due to microperforation and pyocolpos in obstructed vaginal canal. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014;27(4):e79–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Siwatch S, Mehra R, Pandher DK. Rudimentary horn pregnancy: a 10 year experience and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(4):687–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khati NJ. The unicornuate uterus and its variants: a clinical presentation of imaging and associated findings and complications. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;213(31):319–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hua M, Odibo AO, Longman RE, et al. Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fox NS, Roman AS, Strern EM, et al. Type of uterine anomaly and adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:949.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Marchini M, et al. Ultrastructural aspects of endometrium in infertile women with septate uterus. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:750.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reichman DE, Laufer MR. Congenital uterine anomalies affecting reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;24(2):193–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lavergne N, Aristizabal J, Zarka V, Erny R, Hedon B. Uterine anomalies and in vitro fertilization: what are the results? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;68(1–2):29–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(10):2277–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chan YY et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pellerito JS et al. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology. 1992;183(3):795–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Siam S, Soliman BS. Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for the detection of female genital system anomalies results of 3,811 infertile women. J Reprod Med. 2014;59(11–12):542–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Siegel M. Female pelvis. In: Pediatric sonography. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. p. 509–53.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Garel L et al. US of the pediatric female pelvis: a clinical perspective. Radiographics. 2001;21(6):1393–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Langer JE et al. Imaging of the female pelvis through the life cycle. Radiographics. 2012;32(6):1575–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thabet SM, Thabet AS. Role of new sono-imaging technique ‘sonocolpography’ in the diagnosis and treatment of the complete transverse vaginal septum and other allied conditions. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2002;28(2):80–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Son J, Taylor G. Transperineal ultrasonography. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44(2):193–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Timor IE et al. Transrectal scanning: an alternative when transvaginal scanning is not feasible. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(5):473–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chung T et al. Transrectal drainage of deep pelvic abscesses in children using a combined transrectal sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance. Pediatr Radiol. 1996;26(12):874–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fedele L et al. Transrectal ultrasonography in the assessment of congenital vaginal canalization defects. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(2):359–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Riccabonna M. Three Dimensional Ultrasound based virtual cystoscopy of the pediatric urinary bladder: a preliminary report on feasibility and potential value. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(10):1453–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bermejo C et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(5):593–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu MH et al. Detection of congenital Mullerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound. 1997;25(9):487–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. McCarville MB et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography of malignant pediatric abdominal and pelvic solid tumors: preliminary safety and feasibility data. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42(7):824–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Yoo RE et al. A systematic approach to the magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnosis of congenital Müllerian duct anomalies and their mimics. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(1):192–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Santos XM et al. The utility of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging versus surgery for the characterization of Müllerian anomalies in the pediatric and adolescent population. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25(3):181–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lim K et al. Clinical application of 3D t@ weighted MRI in pelvic imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2014;39(5):1052–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Paltiel HJ, Phelps A. US of the pediatric female pelvis. Radiology. 2014;270(3):644–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lermann J et al. Comparison of different diagnostic procedures for the staging of malformations associated with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(1):156–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Oppelt PG. Malformations in a cohort of 284 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Creighton SM, Hall-Craggs M. Correlation or confusion: the need for accurate terminology when comparing magnetic resonance imaging and clinical assessment of congenital vaginal anomalies. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;8(2):177–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Junqueria BL et al. Mullerian duct anomalies and mimics in children and adolescents: correlative intraoperative assessment with clinical imaging. Radiographics. 2009;29(4):1085–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Calvo-Garcia MA et al. Fetal MRI clues to diagnose Cloacal Malformation. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(9):1117–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Acien P, Acien M, Sanchez-Ferrer M. Complex malformations of the female genital tract. New types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bean EJ et al. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: sexuality, psychological effects, and quality of life. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009;22:339–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Brännström M et al. First clinical uterus transplantation trial: a six-month report. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1228–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Appelbaum M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Appelbaum, H., Choi-Rosen, J., Tonick, S. (2016). Diagnostic Approach to Müllerian Anomalies. In: Pfeifer, S. (eds) Congenital Müllerian Anomalies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27231-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27231-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27229-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27231-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics