Skip to main content

On the Extended Specific Objectivity of Some Pseudo–Rasch Models Applied in Testing Scenarios

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications (MICAI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9414))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1420 Accesses

Abstract

The design of a Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) system assumes the existence of an item pool containing properly calibrated items. The calibration is based on an Item Characteristic Curve (ICC). In this paper two mathematical ICC models, and how these models properly fit into the concept of extended Rasch specific objectivity, are under analysis. The results make clear that the comparison between two items depends on subdomains of the complete domain of the corresponding ICC’s. The introduced models are also useful to describe the characteristics of skewness and bimodality in the population, where classical models commonly fail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guzmán, E., Conejo, R.: A model for student knowledge diagnosis through adaptive testing. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 12–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, A., Nguyen, N.T.: A computer adaptive testing method for intelligent tutoring systems. In: Setchi, R., Jordanov, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6276, pp. 281–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Linden, W.J., Hambleton, R.K.: Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Yadin, A.: Using unique assignments for reducing the bimodal grade distribution. Stand. Art. Sect. J. ACM Inroads 4(1), 38–42 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonisegni, M.: Bimodal Distributions of Student Achievement. Consulted in 20 January 2015. https://expbook.wordpress.com/page/21/, 14 September (2008)

  6. Robins, A.: Learning edge momentum: a new account of outcomes in CS1. Comput. Sci. Educ. 20(1), 37–71 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lazarinis, F., Green, S., Pearson, E.: Creating personalized assessments based on learner knowledge and objectives in a hypermedia Web testing application. Comput. Educ. 55, 1732–1743 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Magis, D.: A note on the item information function of the four-parameter logistic model. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 37(4), 304–315 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Irtel, H.: An extension of the concept of specific objectivity. Psychometrika 60(1), 115–118 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Scheiblechner, H.H.: Rasch and pseudo-Rasch models: suitableness for practical test applications. Psychol. Sci. Q. 51(2), 181–194 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bazán, J.L., Branco, M.D., Bolfarine, H.: A skew item response model. Bayesian Anal. 1(4), 861–892 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Gottschalk, P.G., Dunn, J.R.: The five-parameter logistic: a characterization and comparison with the four-parameter logistic. Anal. Biochem. 343, 54–65 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rasch, G.: An individualistic approach to item analysis. In: Lazarsfeld, P.F., Henry, N.W. (eds.) Reading in Mathematical Social Science, pp. 89–107. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rasch, G.: On Objectivity and Models for Measuring. In: Stene, J. (ed.) Lecture notes (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hambleton, R.K.: Item Response Theory: The Three-Parameter Logistic Model. In: Graduate School of Education, University of California, Los Angeles. Center for the Study of Evaluation Report No. 220 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ricketts, J.H., Head, G.A.: A five-parameter logistic equation for investigating asymmetry of curvature in baroreflex studies. Am. J. Physiol. 277, 441–454 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Engelhard, G. Jr.: A Simulation Study of Computerized Adaptive Testing with a Misspecified Measurement Model. In: Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods 1986. American Statistical Association, pp. 631–636, 18–21 August 1986

    Google Scholar 

  18. van Rijn, P.W., Eggen, T.J.H.M., Hemker, B.T., Sanders, P.F.: A Selection Procedure for Polytomous Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing. In: Measurement and Research Department Reports 2000–5, 2000. Central Institute for Test Development - Cito, September 2000

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thorpe, G.L., Favia, A.: Data analysis using item response theory methodology: an introduction to selected programs and applications. Psychology Faculty Scholarship, Paper 20, The University of Maine, DigitalCommons@UMaine, July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  20. Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC 19(6), 716–723 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Maydeu-Olivares, A., García-Forero, C.: Goodness-of-Fit Testing. In: International Encyclopedia of Education 2010, vol. 7, pp. 190–196. Elsevier (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kang, T., Cohen, A.S.: IRT model selection methods for dichotomous items. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 4(31), 331–358 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Olea, J., Ponsoda, V.: Tests Adaptativos Informatizados. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Muñiz, J.: Introducción a la Teoría de Respuesta a los Ítems. Psicología Pirámide, Madrid (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. van der Linden, W.J.: Linking response - time parameters onto a common scale. J. Educ. Meas. 47(1), 92–114 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bolfarine, H., Bazan, J.L.: Bayesian estimation of the logistic positive exponent IRT model. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 35(6), 693–713 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Suárez–Cansino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Suárez–Cansino, J., Morales–Manilla, L.R., López–Morales, V. (2015). On the Extended Specific Objectivity of Some Pseudo–Rasch Models Applied in Testing Scenarios. In: Pichardo Lagunas, O., Herrera Alcántara, O., Arroyo Figueroa, G. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications. MICAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9414. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27101-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27101-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27100-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27101-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics